Open Access

Canine leishmaniasis in Southern Italy: a role for nitric oxide released from activated macrophages in asymptomatic infection?

  • Maria A Panaro1Email author,
  • Olga Brandonisio2,
  • Donato de Caprariis3,
  • Pasqua Cavallo1, 2,
  • Antonia Cianciulli1,
  • Vincenzo Mitolo1 and
  • Domenico Otranto4
Parasites & Vectors20081:10

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-1-10

Received: 11 February 2008

Accepted: 09 May 2008

Published: 09 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Human and canine leishmaniasis (CanL) by Leishmania infantum is endemic in Italy, with a high percentage of infected asymptomatic animals. However, the immune response mechanisms underlying the clinical presentation of CanL have not been fully investigated. Among leishmanicidal molecules produced by activated macrophages, nitric oxide (NO) produced by an inducible NO synthase seems to play an important protective role, but no conclusive data are available. Therefore, NO released by cultured macrophages from dogs with natural Leishmania infection living in an endemic area for CanL was evaluated.

Methods

On the basis of one year's clinical and laboratory follow-up, 22 dogs infected by Leishmania infantum were identified and grouped as: asymptomatic dogs (n = 13) and dogs with symptoms of leishmaniasis (n = 9). Each animal was bled twice at 4-month intervals and macrophage and lymphocyte cultures were obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Supernatants of L. infantum-infected macrophage cultures, with or without addition of autologous lymphocytes, were assayed for NO production by Griess reaction for nitrites.

Results

In the first months of the infection the levels of NO in supernatants of Leishmania-infected macrophages were higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic dogs, but they were significantly increased in the latter group eight months after the diagnosis of infection. Furthermore, NO release significantly decreased in the presence of autologous lymphocytes in both groups of animals.

Conclusion

These results suggest that NO may be involved in the long-term protection of dogs against natural Leishmania infection and in the clinical presentation of canine leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean area.

Background

Protozoa of the Leishmania genus infect mononuclear phagocytes of several mammalian species, including dogs, in which they often give rise to a chronic, non self-healing visceral disease [1]. The dog is the main competent and reservoir host for Leishmania infantum in the Mediterranean Basin, Middle East and Central Asia up to Pakistan and China, of L. chagasi in Central and South America and of L. peruviana in the Peruvian Andes [2, 3]. In addition, its role as a reservoir was indicated for L. donovani in Eastern Sudan and Morocco, and for L. tropica in Iran and probably in Northern Africa [4]. Human leishmaniasis has recently been categorised as an emerging and uncontrolled disease (i.e. category 1), with a total disease burden of 2,090,000 Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) and 51,000 deaths per year [5].

Human and canine leishmaniasis (CanL) from Leishmania infantum zymodeme MON-1 is endemic in Central and Southern regions of Italy as well as the islands [6]. In recent years, a rapid increase of autochthonous cases of CanL has been recorded also in Northern Italian regions as a consequence of the spread of suitable habitats for the sandfly vector [7]. In the Apulia region (Southern Italy) a yearly incidence rate of CanL of about 9.52% has been estimated in both farm and kennel dogs [8], with a high percentage (53.1%) of serologically positive asymptomatic animals [9]. In fact, these dogs display either asymptomatic or symptomatic parasitism, the latter ranging from limited to multifocal tissue damage with or without hypergammaglobulinaemia. Transmission of Leishmania spp. occurs when phlebotomine sandfly vectors feed on infected dogs, either symptomatic or asymptomatic [10], so both groups of animals are significant for the transmission of human and CanL. This highlights the importance of dogs in spreading human disease, also in the light of a possibly prolonged subpatent period [11].

Control measures for CanL include evaluation of new diagnostic tests [12], reliable screening of new compounds for chemotherapy [13], zoonotic reservoir control, including insecticide-based preparations for dog protection [14, 15], and development of an affordable and effective vaccine for dogs [reviewed by [1]]. Under these circumstances, a knowledge of the immune mechanisms involved in animal protection plays a pivotal role in understanding the pathogenesis and clinical progression of the disease, as well as in the development of vaccines. Among leishmanicidal molecules produced by interferon (IFN)-γ-activated macrophages, nitric oxide (NO) produced by an inducible NO synthase (i.e. iNOS or NOS2) seems to play an important protective role [16], which is of interest also for CanL. Indeed, dog macrophages infected in vitro by L. infantum promastigotes produced NO after stimulation with cytokine-enriched peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) supernatants [17] and expressed NOS2, after stimulation with IFN-γ and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [18]. However, the immune response mechanisms underlying the clinical presentation of CanL (i.e. in asymptomatic and symptomatic animals) have not been fully investigated and no conclusive data are available concerning the role played by NO in this context. Moreover, data on NO release by macrophages available from laboratory investigations on a murine model [19] may be quite different from what happens under field conditions in naturally infected dogs.

This study has investigated for the first time if NO released by activated macrophages from naturally infected dogs, estimated by the nitrite content in the culture supernatant, may play a role in the asymptomatic parasitism displayed by dogs in Southern Italy.

Methods

Animal sampling and clinical examination

The animals came from two kennels in the Apulian region, southern Italy (latitude 42° and 39° North, longitude 15° and 18° East), where endemic CanL had been reported over the previous years [8]. A total of 22 dogs that were negative for L. infantum (at parasitological and serological tests, see below) in March 2005 but resulted newly infected by L. infantum in March 2006 (after one sandfly season) were enrolled in the study. All selected animals were positive at parasitological (i.e. PCR on skin biopsy and/or microscopic examination of lymph node smears) and/or serological tests for Leishmania [15] but did not exhibit clinical symptoms or laboratory abnormalities of leishmaniasis.

During follow-up, clinical examination of dogs was performed monthly, in order to evaluate a possible disease progression. At 4 and 8 months follow-up visits from the first diagnosis of Leishmania infection (i.e. July and November 2006), 20 mL heparinized peripheral blood samples were obtained from each dog. Animals were handled and sampled with the owners' consent and approval by the Ethics Committee of the University of Bari.

Parasites

Parasites were isolated from the bone marrow of a Leishmania-infected dog and cultured on Tobie-Evans medium at 24°C. The isolated strain was typed by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Rome, Italy) and belonged to the L. infantum species, zymodeme MON1. Promastigotes at day 4 of culture were used, since the maximum percentage of metacyclic (virulent) promastigotes is detected on the 4th day of growth for Leishmania infantum [20]. The liquid phase of the tubes was collected and centrifuged at 350 g for 10 min. Supernatants were then discarded and the pellets were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2 and washed 3 times by centrifugation at 350 g for 10 min. Finally, promastigotes were counted after immobilization by 2–3 drops of 70% ethanol.

Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)

PBMC were isolated from 20 mL of heparinized peripheral blood, diluted with sterile Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS; Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at a 1:1 (v/v) ratio and centrifuged on the cell separation medium Lympholyte-H (CEDARLANE, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) at 700 g for 15 min at room temperature. Then, isolated PBMC were extensively washed and suspended in RPMI 1640 complete medium, supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated (56°C for 30 min) foetal calf serum (FCS), 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 IU/mL penicillin. Cell viability was evaluated by trypan blue dye exclusion and resulted greater than 98%. Isolated cells were cultured at a density of 1 × 106/mL in 4-well microculture plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark), at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 24 h to permit monocyte adherence. Lymphocytes-enriched supernatants were then collected and cultured in complete RPMI.

Macrophage culture, infection and treatment procedures

After 24 h of incubation, adherent mononuclear cells (1 × 106/mL for each well) were washed-out three times with HBSS and then incubated in fresh complete medium for 8 days to permit the differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. During this period the medium was replaced every 48–72 h. Cell viability determined by trypan blue exclusion was greater than 98%. Morphological features such as increased size, the presence of short, blunt pseudopodia and non specific esterase staining showed that more than 96% of the cells were macrophages.

After 8 days of adherence, macrophages were counted by direct immunofluorescence for the CD16 macrophage marker, using a FITC-labelled anti-CD16 monoclonal antibody (Becton-Dickinson, USA), and 2,5 × 105CD16+ cells were infected with living L. infantum promastigotes (1:3 cell/parasite ratio). After 24 h, infected macrophages were gently washed to remove non-ingested parasites, monitored by FITC-labelled anti-CD16 monoclonal antibody to ensure that no macrophages were lost when washing the culture and then cultured for 48 h, in the presence or absence of autologous lymphocytes (5 × 105/mL for each well), which were separately cultured – once depleted of adherent cells. Untreated uninfected macrophages were used as controls. In preliminary experiments the number of macrophages engulfing parasites was evaluated. For this assay, macrophages (1 × 106/mL) were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere with metacyclic Leishmania promastigotes at a 1:3 cell/parasite ratio for 48 h. At the end of the incubation periods, cells were collected from the plates by detachment after the addition of cold (+4°C) medium and vigorous aspiration. Cells were then washed with PBS pH 7.2, cytocentrifuged onto glass slides and stained with methanol-Giemsa stain. The phagocytosis percentage of macrophages was microscopically calculated by counting the percentage of cells containing at least one amastigote/300 cells and resulted 84.6 ± 0.9, being the mean ± SD of three separate experiments.

NO production evaluation

The concentration of nitrite (NO2-) released by macrophages determined by the Griess reaction was used as an indicator of NO production. Briefly, after 72 h of infection, cell culture supernatants from macrophages were mixed with an equal volume of Griess reagent, as described by Ding and colleagues [21]. Experiments were also performed in the presence of 200 μM L-NG-monomethylarginine (L-NGMMA, Sigma-Aldrich), a competitive inhibitor of the iNOS, in order to assess whether NO production is dependent upon iNOS activation. The absorbance was spectrophotometrically measured at 540 nm and the NO2- concentration was determined by a standard curve of NaNO2 and expressed as nmol/mL. To avoid interference by any nitrites present in the medium, the medium employed for the macrophage cultures was used as blank.

Statistical analysis

Results were statistically examined by analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Of the 22 infected dogs initially tested, 13 remained asymptomatic at four and eight months of follow-up, while 9 showed one or more symptoms of leishmaniasis (i.e. dermatitis, lymphadenopathy, conjunctivitis, skin ulcers) and/or hypergammaglobulinemia. At the first follow up (i.e. after four months from the first diagnosis of Leishmania infection), PBMC-derived macrophages infected in vitro by L. infantum produced a significantly higher amount of NO (p < 0.001) than macrophages not infected in vitro, used as controls. In addition, the levels of NO in supernatants of Leishmania-infected macrophages were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in symptomatic vs asymptomatic dogs (Fig. 1). Moreover, the addition of autologous lymphocytes significantly (p < 0.001) decreased NO production only in symptomatic dogs.
Figure 1

NO release by monocyte-derived macrophages four months after the diagnosis of Leishmania infection. CTL: uninfected macrophages (controls). LEISH: L. infantum-infected macrophages. A, macrophages from symptomatic dogs incubated without lymphocytes; B, macrophages from symptomatic dogs incubated in presence of autologous lymphocytes; C, macrophages from asymptomatic dogs incubated without autologous lymphocytes; D, macrophages from asymptomatic dogs incubated with autologous lymphocytes. Results are expressed as means ± SE.

On the contrary, at the second follow-up (i.e. eight months from the diagnosis of Leishmania infection), NO released from Leishmania-infected macrophages, was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in asymptomatic vs symptomatic dogs (Fig. 2). As in the samples taken after 4 months, this production was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in supernatants from uninfected macrophages used as control. Results from macrophages co-cultured with autologous lymphocytes showed that NO production was significantly reduced in Leishmania- infected macrophages both in asymptomatic and symptomatic dogs (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

NO release by monocyte-derived macrophages eight months after diagnosis of Leishmania infection. CTL: uninfected macrophages (controls). LEISH: L. infantum-infected macrophages. A, macrophages from symptomatic dogs incubated without lymphocytes; B, macrophages from symptomatic dogs incubated with autologous lymphocytes; C, macrophages from asymptomatic dogs without lymphocytes; D, macrophages from asymptomatic dogs with autologous lymphocytes. Results are expressed as means ± SE.

In order to investigate a possible variation in NO production during the course of the infection, results obtained after four and eight months were compared. Figure 3 shows that in infected macrophage supernatants from asymptomatic dogs, NO production was significantly increased (p < 0.001) after eight months, in comparison with samples taken after four months. Also in these experiments, co-incubation of infected macrophages with autologous lymphocytes significantly decreased NO production. Interestingly, in dogs that developed symptoms, no increase in NO production by infected macrophages was observed in samples obtained after eight months in comparison with those taken after four months from diagnosis of the infection.
Figure 3

NO release by L. infantum -infected macrophages from asymptomatic (left) and symptomatic (right) dogs at four and eight months after diagnosis of Leishmania infection. A, macrophages without lymphocytes (4 months); B, macrophages incubated with autologous lymphocytes (4 months); C, macrophages without lymphocytes (8 months); D, macrophages with autologous lymphocytes (8 months). Results are expressed as means ± SE.

Finally, macrophage stimulation in the presence of the L-arginine analogue NO synthase inhibitor (L-NGMMA) caused a reduction of NO production at basal levels, thus confirming that NO production in infected cells was induced by iNOS activation (data not shown).

Discussion

The NO production by cultured PBMC-derived macrophages has been investigated herein for the first time in both symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs with natural Leishmania infection. Results of this study demonstrated that: i) NO release from macrophages was enhanced by in vitro infection; ii) in the first months of the infection the levels of NO in supernatants of Leishmania-infected macrophages were higher in symptomatic than in asymptomatic dogs, but significantly increased in the latter group after eight months from the diagnosis of Leishmania infection; iii) co-culture of macrophages with autologous lymphocytes reduced NO production especially in symptomatic dogs.

In the light of these results, it is possible that cells obtained from symptomatic animals are pre-activated in vivo, and hence that infection of these cells in vitro provides a secondary stimulus that results in NO release. According to this reasoning, NO production at the beginning of infection might be an indicator of immune activity in infected animals but not an indicator of resistance. However, the higher levels of NO observed in follow-up in symptom-free animals may also suggest a protective role for this molecule in the long term asymptomatic parasitism displayed by dogs in Southern Italy. The augmented NO production in these animals may be due to cytokines such as IFN-γ and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, which exert an activating effect on iNOS and regulate the enzyme at both the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [22].

The involvement of NO in protecting against CanL has already been demonstrated by inducing antileishmanial macrophage activity via the L-arginine NO pathway [23]. In addition, an increased NO production and anti-leishmanial activity of infected cells was demonstrated using canine macrophages activated by a supernatant derived from a Leishmania-specific T cell line which contained IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 [24]. The role played by NO in parasitocidal activity has also been investigated in the context of vaccination studies. It was found that the amount of IFN-γ in dog PBMC supernatants and NO production by macrophages increased after administration of a killed L. infantum promastigote vaccine [25]. In another study, vaccine-induced protection correlated with a Th1-type cellular immune response specifically directed against purified excreted-secreted antigens from L. infantum promastigotes (LiESAp), including: i) an enhanced NO-mediated anti-leishmanial activity of dog macrophages co-cultured with IFN-γ producing autologous lymphocytes [26] and ii) NO-mediated apoptosis of intracellular amastigotes in canine macrophages [27]. The above results have also been confirmed under field conditions, with a significantly enhanced NO-mediated anti-leishmanial macrophage activity almost exclusively revealed in vaccinated animals [28]. In a separate study carried out in Brazil, PBMC supernatants from dogs immunized with promastigote lysates and infected with L. chagasi were also able to stimulate the parasitocidal activity of macrophages in healthy dogs, through NO production [29]. Several cellular targets may be subject to NO toxicity in Leishmania parasites, including enzymes of glycolysis and respiratory metabolism, as well as trans-membrane transport systems [30].

Moreover, exposure of amastigotes to moderate concentrations of donor NO or to endogenous NO produced by macrophages resulted in cell death, with extensive fragmentation of nuclear DNA, in both axenic and intracellular amastigotes of L. amazonensis [31]. NO is also involved in the parasitocidal effect of anti-Leishmania drugs. In fact, sodium antimony gluconate treatment induces murine macrophages activation of the p38 MAPK signalling pathway, with subsequent TNF-α release, NO production and NO-dependent parasite killing [32]. Moreover, SbIII-resistant amastigotes were also resistant to NO toxicity when delivered extracellularly via NO donors or intracellularly via macrophage activation [33].

In the present study addition of autologous lymphocytes reduced NO production in co-cultured macrophages. Which cell fraction of PBMCs was responsible for this suppression is an area requiring further investigation, also using commercially available dog CD markers. Moreover, the decreased NO release in the presence of autologous lymphocytes suggests a likely role for anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-4, IL-10, IL-13) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, released by lymphocytes of Leishmania infected animals, whose inhibitory effect on signal transduction for iNOS and NO production was previously described in macrophages and other cells in different animal models [22, 34]. Although the relationship between anti-inflammatory cytokines and NO production in dogs deserves further investigation, the production of these cytokines in canine Leishmania infection has already been demonstrated, like TGF-β1 and IL-10 in the spleen and liver of both symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected by L. chagasi [35], and IL-4 expression in skin biopsies [36] and in spleen [37] of L. infantum-infected dogs.

Conclusion

Overall, the results of this paper suggest that: i) NO could be strongly involved in the long-term protection of dogs against natural L. infantum infection and in the clinical presentation of leishmaniasis in the Mediterranean area, and ii) autologous lymphocytes may exert an inhibitory effect on NO production by macrophages from naturally-infected animals. These results may contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenesis and clinical course of CanL in endemic areas, helping to develop control strategies both for human and canine leishmaniasis.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially supported by the University of Bari (funds "Ateneo 2007") and by Bayer Animal Health (Germany). The authors thank Ms. Mary Pragnell, B.A. for English revision.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Human Anatomy and Histology, Medical School, University of Bari
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Medical School, University of Bari
(3)
Department of Animal Health and Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari
(4)
Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari

References

  1. Barbieri CL: Immunology of canine leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunol. 2006, 28: 329-337. 10.1111/j.1365-3024.2006.00840.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dantas-Torres F: The role of dogs as reservoirs of Leishmania parasites, with emphasis on Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum and Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 149: 139-146. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.07.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Marty P, Izri A, Ozon C, Haas P, Rosenthal E, Del Giudice P, Godenir J, Coulibaly E, Gari-Toussaint M, Delaunay P, Ferrua B, Haas H, Pratlong F, Le Fichoux Y: A century of leishmaniasis in Alpes-Maritimes, France. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2007, 101: 563-574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gramiccia M, Gradoni L: The current status of zoonotic leishmaniases and approaches to disease control. Int J Parasitol. 2005, 35: 1169-1180. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. TDR Disease Portfolio. [http://www.who.int/tdr/diseases/default.htm]
  6. Mannocci A, La Torre G, Chiaradia G, De Waure C, Mainelli MT, Cernigliaro A, Bruno S, Ricciardi W: Epidemiology and direct medical costs of human leishmaniasis in Italy. J Prev Med Hyg. 2007, 48: 27-36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Capelli G, Baldelli R, Ferroglio E, Genchi C, Gradoni L, Gramiccia M, Maroli M, Mortarino M, Pietrobelli M, Rossi L, Ruggiero M: Monitoring of canine leishmaniasis in northern Italy: an update from a scientific network. Parassitologia. 2004, 46: 193-197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Paradies P, Capelli G, Cafarchia C, de Caprariis D, Sasanelli M, Otranto D: Incidences of canine leishmaniasis in an endemic area of southern Italy. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006, 53 (6): 295-298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandonisio O, Carelli G, Ceci L, Consenti B, Fasanella A, Puccini V: Canine leishmaniasis in the Gargano promontory (Apulia, South Italy). Eur J Epidemiol. 1992, 8: 273-276. 10.1007/BF00144813.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Molina R, Amela C, Nieto J, San-Andrés M, González F, Castillo JA, Lucientes J, Alvar J: Infectivity of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum to colonized Phlebotomus perniciosus. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 88: 491-493. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90446-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Oliva G, Scalone A, Foglia Manzillo V, Gramiccia M, Pagano A, Di Muccio T, Gradoni L: Incidence and time course of Leishmania infantum infections examined by parasitological, serologic, and nested-PCR techniques in a cohort of naive dogs exposed to three consecutive transmission seasons. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 1318-1322. 10.1128/JCM.44.4.1318-1322.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Otranto D, Paradies P, Sasanelli M, Leone N, de Caprariis D, Chirico J, Spinelli R, Capelli G, Brandonisio O: Recombinant K39 dipstick immunochromatographic test: a new tool for the serodiagnosis of canine leishmaniasis. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2005, 17: 32-37.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fumarola L, Spinelli R, Brandonisio O: In vitro assays for evaluation of drug activity against Leishmania spp. Res Microbiol. 2004, 155: 224-230. 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.01.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Maroli M, Mizzoni V, Siragusa C, D'Orazi A, Gradoni L: Evidence for an impact on the incidence of canine leishmaniasis by the mass use of deltamethrin-impregnated dog collars in Southern Italy. Med Vet Entomol. 2001, 15: 358-363. 10.1046/j.0269-283x.2001.00321.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Otranto D, Paradies P, Lia RP, Latrofa MS, Testini G, Cantacessi C, Mencke N, Galli G, Capelli G, Stanneck D: Efficacy of a combination of 10% imidacloprid/50% permethrin for the prevention of leishmaniasis in kennelled dogs in an endemic area. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 144: 270-278. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mauël J, Ransijn A, Buchmüller-Rouiller Y: Killing of Leishmania parasites in activated murine macrophages is based on an L-arginine-dependent process that produces nitrogen derivates. J Leuk Biol. 1991, 49: 73-82.Google Scholar
  17. Panaro MA, Fasanella A, Lisi S, Mitolo V, Andriola A, Brandonisio O: Evaluation of nitric oxide production by Leishmania infantum-infected dog macrophages. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1998, 20: 147-158. 10.3109/08923979809034814.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sisto M, Brandonisio O, Panaro MA, Acquafredda A, Leogrande D, Fasanella A, Trotta T, Fumarola L, Mitolo V: Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in Leishmania-infected dog macrophages. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001, 24: 247-54. 10.1016/S0147-9571(01)00013-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kima PE: The amastigote forms of Leishmania are experts at exploiting host cell processes to establish infection and persist. Int J Parasitol. 2007, 37: 1087-1096. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.04.007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Louassini M, Adroher FJ, Foulquie MR, Benitez R: Investigations on the in vitro metacyclogenesis of a visceral and a cutaneous human strain of Leishmania infantum. Acta Trop. 1998, 70: 355-368. 10.1016/S0001-706X(98)00041-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ding AH, Nathan CF, Stuehr DJ: Release of reactive nitrogen intermediates and reactive oxygen intermediates from mouse peritoneal macrophages. Comparison of activating cytokines and evidence for independent production. J Immunol. 1988, 141: 2407-2412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bogdan C, Röllinghoff M, Diefenbach A: Reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates in innate and specific immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2000, 12: 64-76. 10.1016/S0952-7915(99)00052-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Vouldoukis I, Drapier JC, Nussler AK, Tselentis Y, Da Silva OA, Gentilini M, Mossalayi DM, Monjour L, Dugas B: Canine visceral leishmaniasis: successful chemotherapy induces macrophage antileishmanial activity via the L-arginine nitric oxide pathway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996, 40: 253-256.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Pinelli E, Gebhard D, Mommaas AM, van Hoeij M, Langermans JA, Ruitenberg EJ, Rutten VP: Infection of a canine macrophage cell line with Leishmania infantum: determination of nitric oxide production and anti-leishmanial activity. Vet Parasitol. 2000, 92: 181-189. 10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00312-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Panaro MA, Acquafredda A, Lisi S, Lofrumento DD, Mitolo V, Sisto M, Fasanella A, Trotta T, Bertani F, Consenti B, Brandonisio O: Nitric oxide production by macrophages of dogs vaccinated with killed Leishmania infantum promastigotes. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001, 24: 187-195. 10.1016/S0147-9571(00)00026-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lemesre JL, Holzmuller P, Cavaleyra M, Goncalves RB, Hottin G, Papierok G: Protection against experimental visceral leishmaniasis infection in dogs immunized with purified excreted secreted antigens of Leishmania infantum promastigotes. Vaccine. 2005, 23: 2825-2840. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Holzmuller P, Cavaleyra M, Moreaux J, Kovacic R, Vincendeau P, Papierok G, Lemesre JL: Lymphocytes of dogs immunised with purified excreted-secreted antigens of Leishmania infantum co-incubated with Leishmania infected macrophages produce IFN-gamma resulting in nitric oxide-mediated amastigote apoptosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005, 106: 247-257. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2005.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lemesre JL, Holzmuller P, Goncalves RB, Bourdoiseau G, Hugnet C, Cavaleyra M, Papierok G: Long-lasting protection against canine visceral leishmaniasis using the LiESAp-MDP vaccine in endemic areas of France: double-blind randomised efficacy field trial. Vaccine. 2007, 25: 4223-4234. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodrigues CA, Batista LF, Teixeira MC, Pereira AM, Santos PO, de Sa Oliveira GG, de Freitas LA, Veras PS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cell supernatants from asymptomatic dogs immunized and experimentally challenged with Leishmania chagasi can stimulate canine macrophages to reduce infection in vitro. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 143: 197-205. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mauël J, Ransijn A: Leishmania spp.: mechanisms of toxicity of nitrogen oxidation products. Exp Parasitol. 1997, 87: 98-111. 10.1006/expr.1997.4205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Holzmuller P, Sereno D, Cavaleyra M, Mangot I, Daulouede S, Vincendeau P, Lemesre JL: Nitric oxide-mediated proteasome-dependent oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation in Leishmania amazonensis amastigotes. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 3727-3735. 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3727-3735.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mookerjee Basu J, Mookerjee A, Sen P, Bhaumik S, Sen P, Banerjee S, Naskar K, Choudhuri SK, Saha B, Raha S, Roy S: Sodium antimony gluconate induces generation of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide via phosphoinositide 3-kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in Leishmania donovani-infected macrophages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 1788-1797. 10.1128/AAC.50.5.1788-1797.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Holzmuller P, Sereno D, Lemesre JL: Lower nitric oxide susceptibility of trivalent antimony-resistant amastigotes of Leishmania infantum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005, 49: 4406-4409. 10.1128/AAC.49.10.4406-4409.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Panaro MA, Brandonisio O, Acquafredda A, Sisto M, Mitolo V: Evidences for iNOS expression and nitric oxide production in the human macrophages. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord. 2003, 3: 210-221. 10.2174/1568008033340216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Corrêa AP, Dossi AC, de Oliveira Vasconcelos R, Munari DP, de Lima VM: Evaluation of transformation growth factor beta1, interleukin-10, and interferon-gamma in male symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi. Vet Parasitol. 2007, 143: 267-274. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Brachelente C, Muller N, Doherr MG, Sattler U, Welle M: Cutaneous leishmaniasis in naturally infected dogs is associated with a T helper-2-biased immune response. Vet Pathol. 2005, 42: 166-175. 10.1354/vp.42-2-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Strauss-Ayali D, Baneth G, Jaffe CL: Splenic immune responses during canine visceral leishmaniasis. Vet Res. 2007, 38: 547-564. 10.1051/vetres:2007015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Panaro et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement