Open Access

Individual exposure to Simulium bites and intensity of Onchocerca volvulus infection

Parasites & Vectors20103:53

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-3-53

Received: 25 December 2009

Accepted: 18 June 2010

Published: 18 June 2010

Abstract

Background

Onchocerca volvulus, the causative agent of river blindness, is transmitted through the black fly Simulium damnosum s.l., which breeds in turbulent river waters. To date, the number of flies attacking humans has only been determined by standard fly collectors near the river or the village. In our study, we counted the actual number of attacking and successfully feeding S. damnosum s.l. flies landing on individual villagers during their routine day-time activities in two villages of the Sudan-savannah and rainforest of Cameroon. We compared these numbers to the number of flies caught by a standard vector-collector, one positioned near the particular villager during his/her daily activity and the other sitting at the nearest Simulium breeding site.

Results

Using these data obtained by the two vector-collectors, we were able to calculate the Actual Index of Exposure (AIE). While the AIE in the savannah was on average 6,3%, it was 34% in the rainforest. The Effective Annual Transmission Potential (EATP) for individual villagers was about 20 fold higher in the rainforest compared to the savannah.

Conclusions

Here we show for the first time that it is possible to determine the EATP. Further studies with more subjects are needed in the future. These data are important for the development of future treatment strategies.

Background

In the human population of hyperendemic onchocerciasis villages, a high individual parasite load results from an intense and prolonged exposure to the transmission of infective larvae of Onchocerca volvulus by the black fly Simulium vectors. Assessing heterogeneity in exposure may contribute to the ongoing debate about the processes generating overdispersion of parasite loads among hosts, namely, the fact that a majority of hosts harbour no or light infections while a few are heavily infected. Its quantification is important for the development of mathematical descriptions of parasite transmission dynamics. In West Africa, persons particularly at risk are fishermen, farmers and children who spend much of their daytime near Simulium damnosum s.l. infested rivers. The intensity of transmission is commonly assessed using standardized procedures with a standard fly collector, catching all simuliid female flies which come to feed on his fully exposed legs [14]. This number is referred to as the daily biting rate (DBR). Dissecting these flies will give us the number of infective L3 larvae = daily transmission potential (DTP). This method, although useful in providing data on Simulium landing rates and O. volvulus transmission potentials, cannot be used to calculate the actual number of infective larvae transmitted to individual villagers. Heterogeneity in exposure among villagers is likely to result from age- and sex-dependent variation in behaviour and occupation, the use of protective clothing, and individual variability in their attractiveness to flies [4]. There is also a marked differential dispersal of the flies inland away from the river in the two main bioclimatic zones: parous (and therefore potentially infective) flies tend to remain close to the river in the savannah whilst in the rainforest they disperse far from the river in search of a blood meal [5].

The objective of this work was to determine the Actual Index of Exposure (AIE) to Simulium flies and effective transmission of O. volvulus in the two bioclimatic zones. Since we did not dissect the flies we caught, we were not able to determine the DTP from our data, thus we used the data from [6] and from [7]. Here we present the results from a small survey conducted in the rainforest and the savannah of Cameroon. In addition to just counting the number of flies coming to land on the "test-person" in the savannah, we also determined the proportion of flies that started probing blood and the proportion of flies killed before or at the end of feeding, i.e., before or after infective larvae might have escaped from the flies. The determination of the AIE is possible and large scale studies are needed in the future to generate these important data.

Results

In the rainforest, the Simulium landing rate as determined by the fly collector situated near the observed person was between 70 to 141% of the landing rate near the river at the Simulium breeding site (Table 1; row: f/g ). At the river Dilolo, the Daily Biting Rate (DBR) was on average 195 flies/person-day, near the person the DBR was 174. On average 116 flies (67% of the DBR near the person) were recorded to land on the "test-person" (Table 1; row: a, f, g). During their normal day time activity, these "test-persons" were exposed to a Simulium biting rate between 0 and 190% of the landing rate of the nearby sitting fly collector (Table 1; row: a/f). Using the data from [7] we are able to calculate the Effective Transmission Potential (ETP, i.e. the effective number of larvae transmitted to a person per unit time). In the rainforest, the average Daily Biting Rate at the river in 1999 was 435 flies/person-day and the average number of O. volvulus larvae was 0,064 L3/fly. The observed average index of exposure was 34% (Table 1; row: j) and the ETP amounts therefore to 9,45. L3 larvae/person-day (435 × 0,064 × 0,34) resulting in an average EATP of 3450 L3 larvae/person-year.
Table 1

Individual exposure of villagers to S. damnosum s.l. in the rain forest and savannah.

  

SAVANNAH

RAINFOREST

Age/Gender

Row

50/m

54/f

35/m

60/m

11/m

19/f

63/m

  

S.K.

N.A.

O.S.

C.K.

J.D.

P.D.

S.T.

Occupation

 

nightwatch

farmer

farmer

farmer

school boy

farming

farmer

Clothing1

 

lss, lt

sk, lss

lss, lt

lss, lt, sh, so

sh

sk, sss

lt, sss

Protection by clothing1 (estimate)

 

60%

30%

60%

100%

40%

30%

60%

Microfilarial load at iliac crest (mf/mg)

 

10

16

25

1

49

149

44

Number Simulium landing per day

a

8

4

25

0

269

82

114

proportion of flies that -

        

   - flew away unfed

b

.33

.33

.55

.0

.64

.15

.16

   - sucked successfully

c

.44

.07

.11

.0

.31

.12

.53

   - were killed before sucking

d

.0

.0

.10

-

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

   - were killed after feeding

e

.23

.60

.24

-

n.d.

n.d.

n.d.

Flies per day on standard fly collector

        

   - caught near the "test-person"

f

10

9

21

222

141

157

175

   - caught at the river banc

g

172

40

89

158

202

183

237

Standard daily biting rate (at river)2

h

328

435

Standard daily transmission potential2

I

6,6

27,8

Actual Index of Exposure 3 (AIE)

j

3%

6%

10%

0%

89%

22%

25%

Effective Annual Transmission Potential 4

365ij

72

144

239

0

9031

2232

2537

Results from three days of observation per "test-person".

1: Clothing (estimate degree of protection; from [4]): lss - long sleeved shirt (5%); sss - short sleeved shirt (0%); lt - long trousers (30%); sh - shoes (30%); so - socks (30%); sk - skirt (20%);

2: Standard ABR and ATP, measured by the fly-collector at the river banc; data from [6] and [7].

3: Proportion of the biting rate on the person as compared to the biting rate on the fly collector at the river: j = a (c+e)/g in the savannah and a (c+k)/g in the rainforest; k: average of e (from savannah) = .36.

4: O. volvulus infective larvae per person and year i

In the savannah, the Simulium landing rate near the "test-person" was much lower than in the rainforest, between 6 to 23% of the landing rate near the river as was determined by the fly collector (Table 1; row: f/g). According to our data, on average the DBR at the Vina du Sud was 100 flies/person-day, near the "test-person" the number was 13 as determined by the standard fly collector. On average twelve flies (92% in comparison to the fly collector) were recorded to fly to the observed person. In summary, only 8 of 37 feeding flies completed their blood meal successfully and could thus maintain the transmission cycle of onchocerciasis (Table 1; row: c). The portion of flies killed was divided into flies killed before or at the end of their blood meal. Using published data from [6] we were able to calculate the ETP. In the savannah, the Daily Biting Rate in Galim was on average 328 flies/person-day. Our observed average index of exposure of the villagers was 6,3% (Table 1; row: j). Since two L3 larvae have been found in every 100 flies, it gives an average EATP of (328 × 0,02 × 0,063 × 365) 151 L3 larvae/person-year in the savannah.

Discussion

Quantitative data on the intensity of effective transmission and its relationship to the ensuing intensity of infection are a prerequisite for effective monitoring of onchocerciasis control programmes [8, 9]. Existing data are based on an assessment of DBR and DTP that probably overestimates the values as they are based on the standard vector collector. These persons are fully exposed from dawn to dusk, usually sitting at a place near the river, where the Simulium flies are most abundant. A more realistic estimate of the effective DBR and DTP can be obtained by catching flies at different localities around and in the villages, where the villagers spend most of the day-time, and by measuring the Daily Visiting Frequency and exposure of different age and sex groups [4, 10]. However, this still does not allow us to quantify the individual exposure of single villagers and to correlate it with their parasite load as measured by the microfilarial density in the skin. In view of the wide variation of individual parasite load observed in endemic villages, more precise data on effective ATP would be useful. These can be used to develop mathematical models of onchocerciasis [1113] and for assessing the effect of density-dependent factors involved in the regulation of the host-parasite interaction. A significant deviation from proportionality between inoculation rate (effective ATP) and worm load (microfilarial load) would indicate the operation of density-dependence, and could be due to factors operating upon parasite establishment and/or parasite survival among others.

The maximum exposure by the standard fly collector is used as an index of the landing/biting rates of Simulium flies in a particular locality. Here we show, that this method is inadequate to reflect true levels of exposure as indicated by a variable degree of individual clothing by the villagers (which was 40 and 70% in the savannah and between 0 to 70% in the rainforest) and by a variable degree of feeding success by the flies. For instance, the 60 year old male farmer C.K. (Additional File 1) always had worked and works fully protected against Simulium bites, hence he is very little exposed and his microfilarial load at the iliac crest is only 1 mf/mg (Table 1). In this study, about one third of the flies which came to the "test-persons" flew away, without probing blood. Another third sucked blood and managed to fly away. The last third was killed by the person, before or after sucking blood. Thus, only a third of the flies which come to a person may actually contribute to the transmission of onchocerciasis, even though the fraction killed after the blood-meal may also contribute to the transmission to that single person. However, this proportion also depends on the S. damnosum subspecies: For example, in Liberia, only 25% of females of S. yahense fed successfully while in Togo this proportion was 75, 45 and 44% of S. soubrense/sanctipauli, S. damnosu/sirbanum and S. squamosum, respectively [14]. In the present study in Cameroon the flies belong to the rainforest and savannah strains of S. squamosum. The reason why our daily biting rates are lower than the ones published [6, 7] are unknown. Seasonal variation, environmental factors and the low number of collection days can be discussed. The EATP in the rainforest is more than 20 fold higher than the EATP in the savannah. However, the microfilarial density in the skin is only 5 times higher in the rainforest than it is in the savannah. Several reasons can be discussed. Indeed, there might be density regulated reaction towards the parasite in the body. As a certain number of microfilaria is reached, the immune system will respond quite strongly in eliminating the microfilaria [15]. In the different bioclimatic zones, different strains of the vector as well as of the parasite might be present. Thirdly, especially in the savannah, the Simulium vectors are also carrying larvae from Onchocerca species other than O. volvulus, like Onchocerca ochengi or O. dukei. These will stimulate the immune system without contributing to the worm load [16, 17]. Of course, our sample size of seven subjects is very small, but the aim of this study was to first find out whether or not this data can be collected. Further studies with more subjects are in urgent need.

Obviously, the presence of an observer and the need to routinely check for feeding flies might have changed the behaviour of the persons so that the proportion of flies killed during the blood meal might not represent true values. However, from the observation of other persons (mainly children), who were standing near the observer (at the beginning of these experiments) and who were not directly involved, a similar frequency of swapping feeding flies could be observed. Thus only about one third of the flies will keep up the transmission cycle. Much higher success rates may occur on animal blood hosts, especially on cattle, which may be twice as attractive for the flies: on this host most the flies fed on the inguinal region, where only very few were disturbed or even killed [17].

Conclusions

The aim of this study was to determine the Actual Index of Exposure (AIE) and the Effective Annual Transmission Potential (EATP) of individual villagers in two different bioclimatic zones in Cameroon. This data is compared to the maximal exposed vector collector at the river and near the "test-person". The EATP in the rainforest is about a 20 fold higher than in the savannah. Additionally we determined that only about 30% of the flies which come to the individuals may contribute to the transmission of onchocerciasis. Thus it should be important to be aware of these data when developing mathematical models for transmission of onchocerciasis. However, larger studies with more subjects are needed.

Methods

Observations were carried out in localities situated in the rainforest (Bolo, Additional Files 2 and 3) and the savannah (Galim, Additional File 4) regions of Cameroon, Africa. In the rainforest, the survey was performed in the village of Bolo (4° 52'N × 9° 28'E), located near the Dilolo river (Additional Files 5 and 6), a tributary of the river Mungo (Figure. 1). There, onchocerciasis is hyperendemic with a microfilarial (mf) prevalence of 95% and an arithmetic mean mf density of 60 mf/mg of skin (all ages), reflecting a very intense transmission (Annual Biting Rate (ABR) = 158775 flies/person-year, Annual Transmission Potential (ATP) = 10162 L3 O. volvulus larvae/person-year, data from [7]). In the savannah, the study was conducted near the village of Galim (7° 13'N × 13° 34'E), situated at the river Vina du Sud (Figure 2, Additional File 7). The ABR at the river bank was 119720 and the ATP was 2,394 [6].
Figure 1

Surroundings of Bolo.

Figure 2

Surroundings of Galim.

Four persons in the rainforest and three persons in the savannah (Additional File 8: "test-person" OS) were observed during their day-time activities in the rainy season, when transmission is high (Table 1). These individual villagers ("test-persons") of different sex, age and occupation were selected upon their willingness to collaborate, and were asked to give their consent. The observation was carried out at a distance (about 2 meters) from the "test-person" from where the blackflies could still be seen on the skin with the naked eye, but care was taken not to obstruct the person. Each observation lasted between three to four consecutive days and was carried out from dawn to dusk (7 am to 6 pm). The degree of coverage of their body by the person's clothing, the duration of their stay in different places and the number of flies coming to bite (landing rate) and successfully feeding (biting rate) were recorded. This was done by asking the person to check their body every 1 to 3 minutes for any feeding Simulium fly. In addition, all exposed body parts were observed by C.A.J. to make sure that nearly all (presumably more than 90%) incoming flies were recorded by him. Additionally, the location of the fly landing was recorded by C.A.J. and note was taken as to whether or not the fly flew away, sucked blood or was killed.

As controls, standard fly collectors were positioned near the river bank, where transmission is the highest, and also near the "test-person". These maximally exposed persons collect Simulium flies from dawn to dusk and are the positive controls.

List of abbreviations used

ABR: 

Annual Biting Rate

AIE: 

Actual Index of Exposure

ATP: 

Annual Transmission Potential

DBR: 

Daily Biting Rate

DTP: 

Daily Transmission Potential

EATP: 

Effective Annual Transmission Potential

ETP: 

Effective Transmission Potential

Mf: 

Microfilariae.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all fly collectors and "test-persons", without their help and cooperation this study would not have been possible. We would also like to thank David Ekale for excellent technical assistance. A special thank you goes to Dr. M.-G. Basanez for critical reading the manuscript. We thank the Carl Duisberg Gesellschaft for supporting this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Tropenmedizinisches Institut der Universität Tübingen
(2)
Medical Research Station Kumba
(3)
Current Address: Institut für Evolution und Ökologie, Abteilung Vergleichende Zoologie, Universität Tübingen
(4)
Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie

References

  1. Duke BOL: Studies on factors influencing the transmission of onchocerciasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1968, 62: 164-170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Duke BOL: Studies on factors influencing the transmission of onchocerciasis IV. The biting cycle, infective biting density and transmission potential of Simulium damnosum. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1968, 62: 95-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Walsh JF, Davis JB, Le Berre R, Garms R: Standardization of criteria for assessing the effect of Simulium control in onchocerciasis control programmes. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1978, 72: 675-676. 10.1016/0035-9203(78)90039-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Renz A, Fuglsang A, Anderson J: Studies on the dynamics of transmission of onchocerciasis in a Sudan-savannah area of North Cameroon IV. The different exposure to Simulium bites and transmission of boys and girls and men and women, and the resulting manifestation of onchocerciasis. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987, 81 (3): 253-62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Duke BOL: The differential dispersal of nulliparous and parous Simulium damnosum. Tropenmed-Parasitol. 1975, 26 (1): 88-97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wahl G, Enyong P, Schibel JM, Ngosso A, Tubbesing H, Moyou R, Renz A: Transmission of Onchocerca volvulus, O. ochengi and type D filariae by Simulium damnosum s.l. in north Cameroon and its influence on the epidemiology of human onchocerciasis. Parasite. 1994, 7-10. 1Google Scholar
  7. Enyong P, Traoré S, Demanou M, Esum M, Fobi G, Noma M, Kayembé D, Sékétéli A: African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC): Onchocerca Simulium squamosum in two regions in the Republic of Cameroon. Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2006, 99 (4): 272-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Molyneux DH: Onchocerciasis Control in West Africa: Current Status and future of the Onchocerciasis Control Programme. Parasitol Today. 1995, 11: 399-402. 10.1016/0169-4758(95)80016-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Renz A, Wenk P, Anderson J, Fuglsang H: Studies on the dynamics of transmission of onchocerciasis in a Sudan-savanna area of North Cameroon V. What is a tolerable level of Annual Transmission Potential?. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1987, 81 (3): 263-74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bockarie MJ, Davis JB: The transmission of onchocerciasis at a forest village in Sierra Leone. II. Man-fly contact, human activity and exposure to transmission. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1990, 84: 599-605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietz K: The population dynamics of infectious diseases: Theory and Applications. Edited by: Anderson RM. 1981, Chapman and Hall, London, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Plaisier AP, Van Oortmarssen GJ, Haberma JD, Remme J, Alley ES: ONCHOSIM: a model and computer simulation program for the transmission and control of onchocerciasis. - Comput. Methods. Programs. Biomed. 1991, 31: 43-56.Google Scholar
  13. Basáñez MG, Razali K, Renz A, Kelly D: Density-dependent host choice by disease vectors: epidemiological implications of the ideal free distribution. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007, 101 (3): 256-69. 10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Barbiero VK, Trpis M: The engorgement ratio of Simulium yahense (Diptera: Simuliidae) at the Firestone Rubber Plantation, Harbel, Liberia. J Med Entomol. 1986, 23: 309-312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Duerr HP, Dietz K, Schulz-Key H, Büttner DW, Eichner M: Density-dependent parasite establishment suggests infection-associated immunosuppression as an important mechanism for parasite density regulation in onchocerciasis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003, 97: 242-50. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)90132-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Nutman TB, Steel C, Ward DJ, Zea-Flores G, Ottesen EA: Immunity to onchocerciasis: recognition of larval antigens by humans putatively immune to Onchocerca volvulus infection. J Infect Dis. 1991, 163: 1128-33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wahl G, Enyong P, Ngosso A, Schibel JM, Moyou R, Tubbesing H, Ekale D, Renz A: Onchocerca ochengi: epidemiological evidence of cross-protection against Onchocerca volvulus in man. Parasitology. 1998, 116: 349-362. 10.1017/S003118209700228X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Jacobi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement