Open Access

Molecular evidence for the presence of malaria vector species a of the Anopheles annularis complex in Sri Lanka

  • Sinnathamby N Surendran1Email author,
  • Kanapathy Gajapathy1,
  • Vaitheki Kumaran1,
  • Tharmasegaram Tharmatha1,
  • Pavilupillai J Jude1 and
  • Ranjan Ramasamy2
Parasites & Vectors20114:239

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-4-239

Received: 2 December 2011

Accepted: 22 December 2011

Published: 22 December 2011

Abstract

Background

Anopheles annularis s.l. is a wide spread malaria vector in South and Southeast Asia, including Sri Lanka. The taxon An. annularis is a complex of two sibling species viz. A and B, that are differentiated by chromosome banding patterns and ribosomal gene sequences in India. Only species A is reported to be a malaria vector in India while the occurrence of sibling species in Sri Lanka has not been documented previously.

Findings

Anopheline larvae were collected at a site in the Jaffna district, which lies within the dry zone of Sri Lanka, and reared in the laboratory. Emerged adults were identified using standard keys. DNA sequences of the D3 domain of 28S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and the internal transcribed spacer-2 (ITS-2) of the morphologically identified An. annularis were determined. BLASTn searches against corresponding An. annularis sequences in GenBank and construction of phylogenetic trees from D3 and ITS-2 rDNA sequences showed that the Sri Lankan specimens, and An. annularis s.l. specimens from several Southeast Asian countries were closely related to species A of the Indian An. annularis complex.

Conclusions

The results show the presence of the malaria vector An. annularis species A in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia. Because An. annularis vectors have been long associated with malaria transmission in irrigated agricultural areas in the Sri Lankan dry zone, continued monitoring of An. annularis populations, and their sibling species status, in these areas need to be integral to malaria control and eradication efforts in the island.

Keywords

Anopheles annularis malaria vector ribosomal genes sibling species Southeast Asia Sri Lanka

Findings

Anopheles (Cellia) annularis Van der Wulp is one of the species that form the "Annularis Group" that are classified under the Neocellia series of the subgenus Cellia[1]. The other members of this group are An. nivipes, An. philippinensis, An. pallidus and An. schueffneri. An. annularis s.l. is widespread in Asia from the Indian subcontinent to Southeast Asia, and has been incriminated as vector of malaria in India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Malaysia and China [25]. The taxon An. annularis is reported to be a species complex comprising two sibling species viz. A and B in India [2, 4]. The two sibling species can be distinguished through characteristic banding patterns in the polytene chromosome arm 2 [2]. They also possess different sequences in the D3 region of 28S RNA and the ITS-2 internally transcribed spacer region of ribosomal RNA [3]

An. annularis s.l. was previously reported to be an efficient local vector in a large irrigation project in the North-Central province in the dry zone of Sri Lanka [6]. In India species A is incriminated as a malaria vector while species B is a non-vector [4]. The Jaffna district, located in the dry zone of Sri Lanka, is an agricultural area that has been traditionally endemic for malaria but has seen the incidence decrease rapidly in the past few years due to the implementation of efficient malaria control measures [7]. An understanding of bionomics of different anopheline vectors in Jaffna and elsewhere in Sri Lanka is however needed for sustaining the control of malaria in the island. We therefore characterised the sibling species status of An. annularis specimens collected in the Jaffna district based on DNA sequences of ribosomal RNA genes.

Anopheline larvae were collected using dippers as described earlier [8] during May and August 2011 from Chinnakulam pond (9°44"33.02' N: 80°00"33.11' E) in Chunnakam in the Jaffna district of the northern dry zone of Sri Lanka [Figure 1]. Collected larvae were brought to the Zoology Laboratory of the University of Jaffna and reared under laboratory conditions (28° ± 2°C) until they emerge as adults. Larvae were fed locally available powered fish meal pellets. Emerged adults were identified using standard keys [9, 10]. Identified An. annularis and An. pallidus were preserved in isopropanol for subsequent molecular characterization.
Figure 1

Mosquito collection site in the district of Jaffna in the Northern province of Sri Lanka. Larvae were collected from Chinnakkulam pond used to irrigate adjacent agricultural lands.

The DNA from individual mosquitoes was extracted as described previously [11] with slight modification. Individual mosquitoes were homogenized with a plastic tissue grinder in 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tubes. 100 μl LIVAK extraction buffer (80 mM NaCl, 5.48% w/v sucrose, 1.57% w/v Tris-base, 50.8 mM EDTA, 05% w/v SDS) was added and samples were kept at 65°C for 30 min. Following the addition of 14 μl of 8 M potassium acetate, the homogenates were incubated on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 4°C for 20 min at 13, 000 rpm. Supernatants were recovered and DNA was precipitated overnight by the addition of 400 μl ethanol, then centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 13,000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded and DNA pellets were rinsed in 100 μl cold 70% ethanol, then centrifuged at 4°C for 5 min at 13, 000 rpm. Pellets were dried and resuspended in 50 μl TE buffer (pH 8.0). The ITS-2 region of the rDNA was amplified using primers ITS-2A (5' - TGT GAA CTG CAG GAC ACA T- 3') and ITS-2B (5'- TAT GCT TAA ATT CAG GGG GT - 3') [12]. The D3 domain of 28S rDNA was amplified using D3A (5'-GAC CCG TCT TGA AAC ACG GA-3') and D3B (5'- TCG GAA GGA ACC AGT TAC TA - 3') primers [13]. For each PCR assay, 50 μl PCR reaction mixture was used. Each mixture contained 0.50 μM of each primer, 200 μM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM of MgCl2 and 1.25 unit of Taq polymerase (Promega, USA). The PCR conditions for both PCRs (GeneAmp PCR System 9600, Applied Biosystems) were an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 45 s followed by a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The PCR products that were successfully amplified were then purified using the Quiaquik PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, California, USA) to remove unincorporated primers and dNTPs prior to sequencing. The purified PCR amplicons were sent to M/s GENETECH, Sri Lanka for sequencing in both the forward and reverse directions. The derived sequences obtained were then analysed together with other representative sequences obtained from GenBank using ClustalW. Neighbour-Joining phylogeny tree was constructed with Bootstrap values from 500 replicates using the MEGA software [14].

Sequences of D3 and ITS-2 were derived from three An. annularis (annularis- Sri Lanka -1,2,3) and one An. pallidus (pallidus - Sri Lanka-1) specimens. These sequences were then compared by BLASTn searches against the corresponding Indian sequences in GenBank. The best match for D3 of the Sri Lankan An. annularis was with An. annularis species A of India with 100% identity over 352 bp (E-value 0) and for ITS-2 with An. annularis species A of India with 100% identity over 347 bp (E-value 0). The DNA sequences of specimens collected in this study in Jaffna have been deposited in GenBank with details as follows: D3 (JQ268278-annularis- Sri Lanka -1; JQ268279- annularis- Sri Lanka -3; JQ268281-pallidus- Sri Lanka -1) and ITS-2 (JQ268277-annularis- Sri Lanka -1; JQ268280 - annularis - Sri Lanka -3; JQ268282-pallidus- Sri Lanka -1).

Construction of a phylogenetic tree based on D3 rDNA sequences resulted in two An. annularis clades [Figure 2]. One clade consisted D3 sequences from mosquitoes identified as sibling species A of the An. annularis in India, six An. annularis s.l. specimens from different Southeast Asian countries, one specimen of An. annularis s.l. collected previously in Sri Lanka (FJ526536.1) and the three An. annularis specimens from Jaffna. This clade is termed as the species A clade. The second related An. annularis clade contained a single sequence from sibling species B of An. annularis of India and is termed the species B clade. The differences between species A and B of India were caused by two substitutions [3]. The D3 sequences of Sri Lankan samples [present study and the voucher An. annularis s.l. specimen from Sri Lanka (FJ526536.1)] showed the same substitutions fixed for species A [Additional File 1].
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis based on D3 region of rDNA. Sri Lanka - 1, 2 and 3 refers to individual specimens collected in this study. Other anopheline sequences from different countries were obtained from GenBank.

An An. pallidus voucher specimen collected from Sri Lanka (FJ526535.1) and a specimen from the present study formed a distinct third clade in the D3 analysis [Figure 2].

Sequence analysis of the ITS-2 sequences of An. annularis collected during the present study and other available GenBank sequences for An. annularis s.l. were also carried out. The phylogenetic analysis showed that the three An. annularis from Jaffna formed a clade with An. annularis species A specimens from India and other An. annularis s.l. specimens from Southeast Asia and one from Sri Lanka [Figure 3]. This clade is again termed as the species A clade. A second related clade was represented by a single An. annularis species B specimen from India. The difference between species A and B of India was caused by seven substitutions and four indel events [3]. The reported substitutions and indels found in species A of India were present in the Sri Lankan samples [specimens of present study and a voucher specimen from Sri Lanka (FJ526607.1)] [Additional File 2].
Figure 3

Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS-2 region of rDNA. Sri Lanka - 1, 2 and 3 refers to individual specimens collected in this study. Other anopheline sequences from different countries were obtained from GenBank.

The ITS-2 sequence from An. pallidus (FJJF526606.1) a voucher specimen from Sri Lanka and the An. pallidus specimen from Jaffna formed a third separate clade [Figure 3]. The sequence data from D3 and ITS-2 regions therefore confirm the morphological identification of An. pallidus in Sri Lanka.

Our findings show that An. annularis species A, confirmed as a vector species in India, is also present in the Jaffna district. The phylogenetic analysis further reveals that vector species A is widespread and can therefore play a role in malaria transmission in Southeast Asia.

A 1990 study at Weheragala, an agricultural settlement close to newly constructed irrigation canals of the Mahaweli river development project in the Sri Lankan dry zone, showed that An. annularis s.l. functioned as the predominant local vector, accounting for > 75% of the human-biting anopheline collection [6]. A very high entomological inoculation rate (EIR) for Plasmodium vivax of 0.12 infective bites per hour during the peak transmission season was reported for An. annularis at Weheragala [6]. The corresponding EIRs for An. culicifacies, the major vector of malaria elsewhere in Sri Lanka, were 0.06 and 0.04 for Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum during the peak transmission season at Weheragala [6]. These high local malaria transmission rates, characterised by parasite prevalence rates of 20% in the population, may have initiated or contributed to the malaria epidemics in the country at that time. The present results are compatible with the suggestion that An. annularis species A may have been the relevant sibling species contributing to past malaria transmission in Weheragala and elsewhere in the Sri Lankan dry zone.

In some Indian states, e.g. Uttar Pradesh, An. annularis species A and B are sympatric with high zoophilic behavior and yet neither has yet been incriminated as vector. However in the states of Assam and Orissa only species A is present and implicated as a vector [2]. Both species are confined to riverine and canal-irrigated ecosystems in India. However presence of species A is also reported in hilly areas [2]. In this context, it will be useful to investigate the presence of An. annularis sibling species in the extensive hill country of central Sri Lanka.

The malaria incidence in Sri Lanka has fallen sharply from 210,039 cases in the year 2000 to 558 cases in 2009 [7]. The Ministry of Health plans to eliminate malaria from the country by 2015. However in the post-civil war era in Sri Lanka, there is resettlement of malaria-naïve persons and an expansion of agriculture in the dry zone. The presence of An. annularis species A in Sri Lanka, with its ability to undergo preimaginal development in the irrigated parts of the dry zone is therefore an important factor to be considered in planning for malaria eradication and control in the island.

The present study documents the presence of the malaria vector An. annularis species A in Sri Lanka and elsewhere in Southeast Asia. Because of the reported association of An. annularis vectors with malaria transmission in irrigated agricultural areas in the Sri Lankan dry zone, continued monitoring of An. annularis populations in these areas need to be integral to malaria control and eradication efforts in the island.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms Edward Rena Verginate for Figure 1. The study was partially supported by the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (SIDA/BT/2006/03).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of Jaffna
(2)
PAPSRB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam

References

  1. Walton C, Somboon P, Harbach RE, Zhang S, Weerasinghe I, O'Loughlin SM, Phompida S, Sochantha T, Tun-Lin W, Chen B, Butlin RK: Molecular identification of mosquito species in the Anopheles annularis group in southern Asia. Med Vet Entomol. 2007, 21: 30-35. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00660.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Atrie B, Subbarao SK, Pilai MKK, Rao SRV, Sharma VP: Population cytogenetic evidence for sibling species in Anopheles annularis (Diptera: Culicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 1999, 92: 243-249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Alam MT, Das MK, Dev V, Ansari MA, Sharma YD: Identification of two cryptic species in the Anopheles (Cellia) annularis complex using ribosomal DNA PCR-RFLP. Parasitol Res. 2007, 100: 943-948. 10.1007/s00436-006-0375-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organization: Anopheline species complexes in South and South-east Asia. 2007, SEARO Technical Publication No. 57, 17-19.Google Scholar
  5. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, Elyazar IRF, Kabaria CW, Harbach RE, Hay SI: The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 89-10.1186/1756-3305-4-89.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ramasamy R, de Alwis R, Wijesundere A, Ramasamy MS: Malaria transmission at a new irrigation project in Sri Lanka: the emergence of Anopheles annularis as a major vector. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 47: 547-553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Anti Malaria Campaign, Sri Lanka: Accessed 1 December 2011, [http://www.malariacampaign.gov.lk/Precentation/Home.aspx]
  8. Surendran SN, Jude PJ, Singh OP, Ramasamy R: Genetic evidence for the presence of malaria vectors of Anopheles sundaicus complex in Sri Lanka with morphological characteristics attributed to Anopheles subpictus species B. Malar J. 2010, 9: 343-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christophers SR: The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Diptera 4. Family Culicidae. Tribe Anopheline. 1933, Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Amerasinghe FP: A guide to the identification of the anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Sri Lanka -I Adult females. Ceylon J Sci (Bio.l Sci.). 1990, 21: 1-16.Google Scholar
  11. Coen ES, Thoday JM, Dover G: Rate of turnover of structural variants in the rDNA gene family of Drsopihila melanogaster. Nature. 1982, 295: 564-568. 10.1038/295564a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beebe NW, Saul A: Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction - restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995, 53: 468-481.Google Scholar
  13. Litvaitis MK, Nunn G, Thomas WK, Kocher TD: A molecular approach for the identification of meiofaunal turbellarians (Platyhelminthes, Turbellaria). Mar Biol. 1994, 120: 437-442. 10.1007/BF00680218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tamara K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular evolutionary genetic analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Surendran et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement