Open Access

Molecular epidemiology of camel trypanosomiasis based on ITS1 rDNA and RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in the Sudan

  • Bashir Salim1, 2Email author,
  • Mohammed A Bakheit2,
  • Joseph Kamau1,
  • Ichiro Nakamura1 and
  • Chihiro Sugimoto1
Parasites & Vectors20114:31

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-31

Received: 2 February 2011

Accepted: 4 March 2011

Published: 4 March 2011

Abstract

Background

Internal transcribed spacer one (ITS1) of the ribosomal DNA is known to be a suitable target for PCR-based detection of trypanosomes. The analysis of this region provides a multi-species-specific diagnosis by a single PCR. Using ITS1 primer-based PCR, a cross sectional study was carried out in the period from September to November 2009 on samples collected from 687 camels from geographically distinct zones in the Sudan to detect all possible African trypanosomes, which can infect camels.

Results

The results showed that all PCR-positive camels were infected with a single parasite species; Trypanosoma evansi. The highest prevalence, 57.1% (117/205), was observed in the Butana plains of mid-Eastern Sudan and the lowest, 6.0% (4/67), was in the Umshadeeda eastern part of White Nile State. In another experiment, the RoTat 1.2 gene encoding the variable surface glycoprotein (VSG) of T. evansi was analyzed for its presence or absence by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using T. evansi species-specific primers. The study showed that the RoTat 1.2 VSG gene was absent in thirteen out of thirty T. evansi-positive samples.

Conclusions

It is concluded that camel trypanosomiasis in Sudan is apparently caused by a single parasite species T. evansi and there were no other typanosomes species detected. In addition, the disease is highly prevalent in the country, which strengthens the need to change control policies and institute measures that help prevent the spread of the parasite. To our knowledge, this is the first molecular diagnosis report, which gives a picture of camel trypanosomiasis covering large geographical areas in Sudan.

Findings

Trypanosoma evansi is the most widely distributed pathogenic animal trypanosome, affecting domesticated livestock in Asia, Africa, Central and South America, Europe, and recently a case of human infection has been reported in India making it a potential human pathogen [1].

In arid-semiarid areas in Africa (Somalia, Kenya, Ethiopia, Sudan, Chad, Nigeria and French West Africa), camels are affected most by the parasite. In Central and South America, horses are the main hosts followed by cattle [2].

Trypanosoma simiae was identified as the cause of an outbreak in dromedaries in a Kenyan national park, confirming the susceptibility of camels to this pathogen [3]. T. simiae was also documented as a camel pathogen in Somalia [4]. Wernery and Kaaden [5] experimentally confirmed that dromedaries were sensitive to T. brucei and particularly to Trypanosoma congolense.

Many molecular markers are used to detect, differentiate and study trypanosome species. The rRNA internal transcribed spacer one (ITS1) and internal transcribed spacer two (ITS2), which are separated by the 5.8S gene and flanked by the small subunit and large subunit rRNA genes in most eukaryotes are subject to higher evolutionary rates leading to greater variability in both nucleotide sequence and length [6]. The ITS1 and ITS2 spacers have been found to be reliably valuable in more discrete phylogenetic separation of closely related species including piroplasms and their subspecies [79] and trypanosomes. Generally, the ITS region has been used extensively in characterization of T. evansi[1013]. The ITS1 region has been successfully used as target for PCR-based detection of trypanosomes by [14, 15]. These authors documented specific PCR product length corresponding to each Trypanosoma species, which was the base of differentiation among Trypanosoma species. For example, T. congolense savannah, an ITS1 PCR product is 700 bp, 400 bp for T. simiae and 250 bp for T. vivax. The product for T. evansi and T. brucei subspecies was the same size, 480 bp. The variable surface glycoprotein of trypanosomes RoTat 1.2 VSG is a predominant variant antigen type thought to be expressed in all T. evansi stocks examined so far [16]. It has been used in routine diagnostic antigen tests such as card agglutination test CATT/T. evansi, but negative CATT/T. evansi reactions in T. evansi parasitaemic animals have been reported [17, 18]. Thereafter, it has been shown that a number of T. evansi in Kenya were not detected by tests based on RoTat 1.2 VSG gene and four of the isolates lacking the RoTat 1.2 VSG gene [19].

Camel trypanosomiasis is of great concern to Sudan, which possesses the second largest camel population in the world being estimated at nearly 4,623,000 heads (Annual Report of Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries, Sudan, 2010). Although the disease is generally believed to be caused by T. evansi, other species cannot be ruled out pertaining to the wide distribution of hosts and the various trypanosome species potentially present in hosts, or vectors. Previous immunological studies which were carried out in Sudan [20, 21] would not be able to survey camels for other trypanosome species, and this an advantage of the ITS1-PCR method used here.

We undertook this study to provide information on the disease prevalence, its local enzootic situation and the possible causative agents in camels from geographically distinct regions.

Sample collection

Blood spots on Whatman FTA® Card (Whatman, Inc.) were collected in a surveillance conducted in autumn 2009 (September 20 to November 10). Camels were sampled from four geographically distinct areas in Sudan. The samples numbers and coordinates of their collection locations are shown in Table 1 & Figure 1.
Table 1

The prevalence of T. evansi from camel samples and their location coordinates using ITS1-PCR detection in the Sudan

Location

Number of samples

Latitude/Longitude

Prevalence

95% CI+for prevalence

    

Lower

Upper

Kassala

50

15°30'N 36°00'E

24.0% (12/50)

13.1

38.2

Halfa "Butana region"

205

15°19'N 35°36'E

57.1% (117/205)

50.0

64.0

Umshadeeda

67

17°01'N 34°94'E

6.0% (4/67)

1.6

14.6

¤South Darfur

365

12°02'N 24°58'E

7.1% (26/365)¢

4.7

10.3

   

35.6% (130/365)*

30.7

40.8

Total

687

    

¤The actual number of camels screened was 365, each five camels' blood were pooled in on spot onto FTA-card

¢Assuming one camel infected (minimum prevalence)

*Assuming all camels infected (maximum prevalence)

+ = confidence interval

Figure 1

Map of Sudan. Localization of sampling areas are shown in black stars.

Microscopic examination and DNA extraction

A total of 687 blood samples were collected from camels in FTA cards (Whatman FTA® Classic Cards, Whatman, UK). Of these, 365 samples from Darfur were collected in a way that each five were pooled onto one spot of the FTA-card, which reduced the number of spots to 73 samples (Table 1). DNA was extracted from five punches to ensure correct estimation of prevalence as shown by [22]. DNA was eluted from the FTA cards using a modified methanol fixation method as described by [23]. Extracted DNA samples were stored at -20°C until used.

PCR

Extracted genomic DNA of 687 samples were subjected to a PCR test, which amplifies the ITS1 region of the rDNA gene of all African trypanosomes by using ITS1 CF/BR [14] FP: 5'-CCGGAAGTTCACCGATATTG-3', RP: 5'-TGCTGC GTTCTTCAACGAA-3'. The 480 bp PCR product was amplified using GoTaq® Colorless Master Mix, 2X (Promega Co. USA) in a 10 μl total volume. Each reaction included 5 μl GoTaq® Colorless Master Mix, 10 mM of each primer, 1 μl RNase-free water and 2 μl extracted DNA. Thermocycling profile started with initial hold for 2 min at 95°C, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 58°C for 30 sec. and 72°C for 1 min and final extension step of 5 min. at 72°C. PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose Zebra (BioTools Inc, Japan) in (Tris-acetate EDTA) buffer and stained using GelRed dye (Biotium, Inc. Hayward, CA Biotium, Inc., USA) before being visualized under UV light.

Thirty positive ITS1 T. evansi isolates were further subjected to PCR test specific for T. evansi, in which a primer set that amplifies 151 bp of the T. evansi RoTat 1.2 VSG gene fragment was used [24]. This was TeRoTat920F 5'-CTGAAG AGGTTGGAAATGGAGAAG-3' and TeRoTat1070R, 5'-GTTTCGGTGGTTCTGTTGTTG TTA-3'. The reaction conditions and thermocycling profile were as mentioned above.

The differences in prevalences between different regions were computed using the Chi-square test with SigmaXL Version 6 (SigmaXL Inc., USA). All statistics were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05.

The ITS1-PCR performed to screen camels from four regions in the Sudan (Figure 2), showed higher prevalence in Halfa "Butana region" of 57.1% (117/205) with lower prevalence of 6.0% (4/67) recorded in Umshadeeda (Table 1). Samples from Kassala showed prevalence of 24.0% (12/50) and those from South Darfur showed prevalence of 35.6% (26/73) taken into account that the actual number samples from Darfur was 356 samples (Table 1). Samples were first tested using agarose S electrophoresis for visualizing positive samples. The presence or absence of fragment size differences in the positive T. evansi samples was then tested by using 2% agarose Zebra (BioTools Inc, Japan) with high resolution capability of differentiating small base pairs differences. No size difference was observed in all samples (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Zebra agarose gel electrophoresis of field T. evansi DNA samples (50 ng) amplified with ITS1 CF and BR. Lane M1 100 bp marker, lane 2 to 17 T. evansi from different locations.

PCR amplification was carried out targeting RoTat 1.2 VSG gene on 30 ITS1-positive T. evansi indicated that 13 out of these were negative for RoTat1.2 (Figure 3A and 3B). Figure 3A showed 16 samples from different geographical regions, of which 3 samples were shown RoTate 1.2 VSG negative. Figure 3B shown 14 samples all from South Darfur, of which only 4 samples where RoTate 1.2 VSG positive.
Figure 3

Agarose gel electrophoresis of field T. evansi DNA samples (50 ng) amplified with species specific primers TeRoTat920Fand TeRoTat1070R for T. evansi based on RoTat 1.2 VSG gene. A: Lane M1: 6 band marker. All other lanes are RoTat 1.2 VSG gene positive (8, 9, 12 and 17 weak positives; 8 & 9 from South Darfur); except lane 3, 4 and 16 were shown RoTate 1.2 VSG negative from Khowai. Samples shown here are from geographically different areas. B: Lane M1 6 band marker. Lanes 2-15 have camel samples. 7 and 9 are weak positives, 12 and 14 are strong positives, rest are negative, ie. 2-6, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 15. Lane 16 and 17 are control negative and positive respectively. (All samples were from Darfur). Extra bands in both gels are non-specific bands.

There was a significant difference in prevalence between the regions. The prevalence of T. evansi was significantly higher in Halfa (Butana region) than in Kassala and Umshadeeda (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006 respectively), while in Halfa (Butana region) the prevalence was significantly higher than in Umshadeeda (p < 0.001). The prevalence of T. evansi in South Darfur (when assuming 1 in 5 camels infected) was significantly different from Kassala and Halfa (Butana region) (p < 0.001 for both) but was not significantly different from Umshadeeda (p = 0.733). In contrast, when assuming that all the five camel pooled blood samples were infected, the prevalence was found be significantly different from Halfa (Butana region) and Umshadeeda region (p < 0.001 for for both), but not significant from Kassala (p = 0.104).

The ITS1-PCR detection method constitutes a powerful molecular diagnostic tool for T. evansi detection and discrimination from other trypanosomes in one PCR that is currently available for molecular epidemiological studies of pathogenic African trypanosomes.

Although camels are largely kept without close association with other animals and do not often share the same husbandry conditions as cattle, nonetheless, they do come into contact with donkeys, goats, sheep and horses in the Sudan. The existence of carrier animals in the vicinity of susceptible camels makes transmission by biting flies possible. Therefore, we hypothesized that we might find additional species of trypanosmes apart from T. evansi when using ITS1 CF and BR [14]. The ITS1 results clearly revealed that all camels in the investigated areas were infected with trypanosomes of the subgenus Trypanozoon, most likely T. evansi. Indeed, most samples were also positive with RoTat 1.2 PCR, which is specific for T. evansi. However, the possibility of finding tsetse transmitted trypanosomes in naturally infected camels still cannot be excluded especially when animals are raised within, or came into vicinity of other hosts within the tsetse fly zone. This will need further investigations.

The higher prevalence rate which was detected in Butana plains of mid-Eastern Sudan is in agreement with the findings of Elamin et al. [21], who showed the higher prevalence was in the dry season (November to May) in the area. They also found that the parasitaemia was higher in the dry season than in the wet season (June to October) possibly due to the increased activity of biting flies. Our study, which was carried during a similar period (dry season, late September to November), supports the idea of congregation of camel herds at the scarce water holes, which brings the animals into close proximity and facilitates efficient transmission of the parasite by the flies. Other factors which presumably predispose to high infection and probably patent parasitaemia are prolonged drought and a low plane of nutrition during the later part of the dry season. It is worth to mention that the dry season of 2009 was severe in term of pasture availability. Conversely, lower prevalence rates in camels from the Umshadeeda region, eastern part of White Nile State, could be linked to the low fly densities in these areas [25].

These data show that wet film studies detected a much lower prevalences than the ITS1-PCR studies reported here. This raises the question as to whether these differences represent differences in sampling sites or, more importantly, whether the wet film technique is underestimating the prevalence of T. evansi infection in camels in Sudan. This question still remains to be addressed. In the case of Darfur, although the prevalence was not accurate because it was estimated per 5 samples, the current results could give an overview of the disease status in the region.

The absence of RoTat 1.2 VSG gene from some T. evansi in Sudan has an implication that direct card agglutination test CATT/T. evansi based on the predominant variable antigen-type (pVAT) RoTat 1.2 VSG gene has some drawbacks because a considerable number of positive cases will be missed. Most of RoTat 1.2 VSG gene negative samples found during this study were from Darfur region, but also other regions have shown T. evansi RoTat 1.2 VSG gene negative results. Further investigations are required to examine the suitability of implementing RoTat 1.2 VSG gene PCR and CATT/T. evansi in epidemiological surveys or diagnosis of trypanosomiasis in Sudan.

In conclusion, the study showed out that only T. evansi was detected in camels in the Sudan and no other trypanosomes have been detected. In addition, some samples tested negative by RoTat-PCR and positive by ITS1, so that ITS1-PCR is recommended.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for JSPS fellows and for Scientific Research from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT), the program of Funding Research Center for Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Disease, MEXT, and Asia-Africa S & T Strategic Cooperation Promotion Program by the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science & Technology, MEXT. We thank Dr. Martin Simuunza who helped in the statistical analysis.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Collaboration and Education, Research Center for Zoonosis Control, Hokkaido University
(2)
Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum

References

  1. Joshi PP, Shegoka VR, Powar RM, Herder S, Katti R, Salkar HR, Dani VS, Bhargava A, Jannin J, Truc P: Human trypanosomiasis caused by Trypanosoma evansi in India: the first case report. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005, 73: 491-495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mahmoud MM, Gray AR: Trypanosomiasis due to Trypanosoma evansi (Steel, 1885) Balbiani, 1888. A review of recent research. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1980, 12: 35-47. 10.1007/BF02242629.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mihok S, Zweygarth E, Munyoki EN, Wambua J, Kock R: Typanosomasimiae in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) and the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius). Vet Parasitol. 1994, 53: 191-196. 10.1016/0304-4017(94)90182-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Pellegrini D: Trypanosoma simiae (Bruce) infection of the camel. E Afr Agric J. 1948, 13: 207-209.Google Scholar
  5. Wernery U, Kaaden OR: Infectious Diseases in Camelids. 2002, Berlin& Vienna Blackwell PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hillis DM, Dixon MT: Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol. 1991, 66: 411-453. 10.1086/417338.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fazaeli A, Carter PE, Pennington TH: Intergenic spacer (IGS) polymorphism: a new genetic marker for differentiation of Toxoplasma gondii strains and Neospora caninum. J Parasitol. 2000, 86: 716-723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Zahler M, Essig A, Gothe R, Rinder H: Molecular analyses suggest mono-specificity of the genus Sarcoptes (Acari: Sarcoptidae). Int J Parasitol. 1999, 29: 759-766. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00034-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins NE, Allsopp BA: Theileria parva ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences exhibit extensive polymorphism and mosaic evolution: application to the characterization of parasites from cattle and buffalo. Parasitol. 1999, 118: 541-551. 10.1017/S0031182099004321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Beltrame-Botelho IT, Gaspar-Silva D, Steindel M, Davila AM, Grisard EC: Internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of Trypanosoma rangeli ribosomal DNA (rDNA): a useful marker for inter-specific differentiation. Infect Genet Evol. 2005, 5: 17-28. 10.1016/j.meegid.2004.05.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Khuchareeontaworn S, Singhaphan P, Viseshakul Chansiri K: Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma evansi in buffalo based on internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. J Vet Med Sci. 2007, 69: 1215-1217. 10.1292/jvms.69.487.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Areekit S, Singhaphan P, Kanjanavas P, Khuchareontaworn S, Sriyapai T, Pakpitcharoen A, Chansiri K: Genetic diversity of Trypanosoma evansi in beef cattle based on internal transcribed spacer region. Infect Genet Evol. 2008, 8: 484-488. 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Amer S, Ryu O, Tada C, Fukuda Y, Inoue N, Nakai Y: Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of Trypanosoma evansi from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Egypt, a pilot study. Acta Trop. 2011, 117: 39-46. 10.1016/j.actatropica.2010.09.010.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Njiru ZK, Constantine CC, Guya S, Crowther J, Kiragu JM, Thompson RC, Dávila AM: The use of ITS1 rDNA PCR in detecting pathogenic African trypanosomes. Parasito Res. 2005, 95: 186-192. 10.1007/s00436-004-1267-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Cox A, Tilley A, McOdimba F, Fyfe J, Eisler M, Hide G, Welburn S: A PCR based assay for detection and differentiation of African trypanosome species in blood. Exp Parasitol. 2005, 111: 24-29. 10.1016/j.exppara.2005.03.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Verloo D, Magnus E, Büscher P: General expression of RoTat 1.2 variable antigen type in Trypanosoma evansi isolates from different origin. Vet Parasitol. 2001, 97: 183-189. 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00412-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsaid HM, Nantulya VM, Hilali M: Diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection among Sudanese camels imported to Egypt using card agglutination test (CATT) and antigen detection latex agglutination test (Suratex). J Protozool Res. 1998, 8: 194-200.Google Scholar
  18. Davison HC, Thrusfield MV, Muharsini S, Husein A, Partoutomo S, Rae PF, Masake R, Luckins AG: Evaluation of antigen detection and antibody detection tests for Trypanosoma evansi infection of buffaloes in Indonesia. Epidemiol Infect. 1999, 123: 149-155. 10.1017/S0950268899002575.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ngaira JM, Njagi EN, Ngeranwa JJ, Olembo NK: PCR amplification of RoTat 1.2 VSG gene in Trypanosoma evansi isolates in Kenya. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 120: 23-33. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2003.12.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Boid R, el-Amin EA, Mahmoud MM, Luckins AG: Trypanosoma evansi infections and antibodies in goats, sheep and camels in the Sudan. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1981, 13: 141-146. 10.1007/BF02237911.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Elamin EA, el Bashir MO, Saeed EM: Prevalence and infection pattern of Trypanosoma evansi in camels in mid-eastern Sudan. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1998, 30: 107-14. 10.1023/A:1005047801206.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Cox AP, Tosas O, Tilley A, Picozzi K, Coleman P, Hide G, Welburn SC: Constraints to estimating the prevalence of trypanosome infections in East African zebu cattle. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 82-10.1186/1756-3305-3-82.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Johanson HC, Hyland V, Wicking C, Sturm RA: DNA elution from buccal cells stored on Whatman FTA Classic Cards using a modified methanol fixation method. Biotechniques. 2009, 46: 309-311.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Konnai S, Mekata H, Mingala CN, Abes NS, Gutierrez CA, Herrera JR, Dargantes AP, Witola WH, Cruz LC, Inoue N, Onuma M, Ohashi K: Development and application of a quantitative real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Surra in water buffaloes. Infect Genet Evol. 2009, 9: 449-452. 10.1016/j.meegid.2009.01.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yagi AI, Razig MT: The Tabanidae of Bahr El Arab, Southern Darfur district, Sudan. Bull Anim Health Prod Afr. 1976, 24: 89-92.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Salim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement