Open Access

Emerging myxosporean parasites of Australian frogs take a ride with fresh fruit transport

Contributed equally
Parasites & Vectors20125:208

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-208

Received: 12 August 2012

Accepted: 17 September 2012

Published: 24 September 2012

Abstract

Background

The spread of wildlife pathogens into new geographical ranges or populations is a conservation concern for endangered species. Cystodiscus australis and Cystodiscus axonis are two species of myxosporean parasites infecting Australian frogs and tadpoles that have been recently recognised as important disease agents impacting amphibian conservation. Yet despite their importance to wildlife health, the mechanism of emergence for these parasites is unknown. We hypothesise that these parasites are capable of being accidentally translocated with their amphibian hosts in fresh produce (agricultural, horticultural and industrial) shipments into naïve environments and host populations.

Methods

We surveyed 33 Australian “Banana box” frogs from Sydney fruit markets during 2011 using faecal smears and multiplex species specific PCR on DNA isolated from frog faeces or using histopathology to demonstrate the presence of both C. australis and C. axonis.

Results

One of the “Banana box” frogs, the Dainty green tree frog (Litoria gracilenta) was positive for C. australis and C. axonis in its faeces and continuously shed the parasites for eight months.

Conclusions

We present a possible mechanism for the emergence of Cystodiscus parasites and a non-invasive screening method to be used as a diagnostic test. In the future, vigilance and communication between wildlife managers/researchers and veterinarians will provide valuable information about these parasites, their host range and true distribution. This will aid risk management assessments for threatened populations within the range of Cystodiscus parasites and ultimately enhance conservation efforts.

Keywords

Myxozoa Cystodiscus Translocation Frog Wildlife Disease

Background

Cystodiscus australis and Cystodiscus axonis are two species of myxosporean parasites infecting Australian frogs and tadpoles that have been recently recognised as important disease agents impacting amphibian conservation [13]. The genus Cystodiscus is globally distributed and may have ecological implications outside of Australia. Eight species in three frog families (Litoria, Limnodynastes and Rhinella) have been identified to be the hosts in New South Wales, Australia. Examination of archival specimens suggests that these parasites were not present in New South Wales prior to the mid 1960’s, but since then they have widely expanded their range and there is a significant prevalence of infection in several species of frogs [4]. How these parasites spread to New South Wales and where they came from is not known.

Thousands of frogs hitch rides every year in building materials, plants, and fresh food produce around Australia [5]. As an example, Sydney’s Flemington fresh produce market in New South Wales has been estimated to encounter at least 2,000 frogs annually [5]. Similarly, the markets of Melbourne in Victoria encounter between 6,000-8,000 frogs annually [6]. There are no other more rigorously derived figures or accounts of the numbers found in these markets, however, these numbers are probably an underestimation as many frogs will remain undetected, unreported, and can be lost on route to their final destination. In Australia, frogs that are found in fruit shipments are presented to herpetological groups and if they are considered to be fit and the species is appropriate for captivity the frog is rehomed. Routine practice is to quarantine frogs and then re-home them with an appropriate carer, never to be released back to the wild. However, no formal testing of translocated frogs is currently in place. In most cases, visual inspection of the frogs may be the only method used by the volunteers to determine their health status (authors personal observation). Therefore there is the possibility that pathogens carried in these frogs could enter their new environment if frogs escape detection. The precedence for this type of dissemination has already been set, by the anthropogenic world wide movement of Chytrid fungus (Batrochochytrium dendrobatidis) via environmentally resilient spores and/or frog trade [7, 8]. Similarly, a lungworm Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala was spread with the translocation of the Cane toad around the world [9] and a digenean Haematoloechus floedae was introduced to Costa Rica with Rana catesbeiana[10].

The aim of this study was to investigate if frogs translocated with fruit were a potential source of recently discovered emerging myxosporean parasites. To do this we surveyed frogs collected from Sydney fruit markets for evidence of Cystodiscus shedding in the faeces. An infected frog was found and it was shown to shed both species of Cystodiscus during the entire study period, supporting a possible means of dissemination of these parasites across Australia.

Methods

Frogs from fruit markets

In total 33 frogs were included in the study: White lipped tree frog, Litoria infrafrenata (n = 9); Green tree frog, L. caerulea (n = 6); Desert tree frog, L. rubella (n = 15); Peron’s tree frog, L. peronii (n = 2) and Dainty tree frog L. gracilenta (n = 1). All animals were found in fruit containers at Sydney markets, collected by the Frog and Tadpole Society and examined at the Bird and Exotics Veterinary Clinic (Greensquare, New South Wales). All animals were kept isolated in the clinic for faecal sample collection, before being re-homed for captive care.

Histopathological examination

Tissue from two adult frogs L. infrafrenata was examined for the presence of parasites. The animals died whilst in care for unknown reasons. Tissues including brain, liver, gallbladder, kidney, spleen and stomach were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and processed for histological sectioning and staining with H&E as described previously [3].

Qualitative and quantitative parasitological examination

Faecal samples were collected from all individually quarantined animals. Direct smear was used for both qualitative and quantitative examination. Faecal samples were weighed using balances with the precision of 0.001 g. Due to the small size of the faecal pellet (10–40 mg) no concentration techniques were employed. A tenth of the total volume of the faeces was mixed with 50 uL of Hartmann’s solution (Baxter Healthcare, Australia) and the sample viewed at 40x magnification (ISSCO BM-Lab microscope) and the entire slide observed for the presence of Cystodiscus spp. spores. During the parasitological examinations other suspected parasites were noted, including nematodes, ciliates and coccidian, but not reported in this study. Three smears were made for each sample and the number of Cystodiscus spp. spores counted and multiplied to enumerate the total number per faecal sample. Using the faecal weight the concentration was reported as spores per gram of faeces.

DNA extraction and multiplex species specific PCR

DNA was extracted from frozen or ethanol (70-100%) fixed faeces from adult frogs using the FastDNA Soil Kit Protocol with a Fast Prep-24 homogenisation system equipped with QuickPrep Adapter (MP Bio, Australia). The speed setting used was 6.0 for 40s, otherwise the manufacturer’s instructions were followed as described previously [2]. Samples were eluted in kit buffer and stored at −20°C. PCR reactions were conducted in 25 μl volumes with MyTaq Red Mix (2X) (Bioline, Australia), 10 pmol each primer and 2 μl DNA (approx. 10 ng). Two PCR reactions were used (1) multiplex C. axonis and C. australis species specific PCR (primers S0116, S0119, S0110 and S0113) targeting ITS rDNA according to Hartigan et al. [3] and (2) myxosporea specific primers (primers MyxoSpecF and MyxoSpecR) targeting ~900 bp of the SSU rDNA according to Fiala [11]. Results were visualized on a 2% agarose gel stained with GelRed (Biotium, Australia). Positive samples were sent for sequencing at Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) and analysed in CLC Main Workbench v6.2 (CLCbio, Denmark).

Results

Faeces from 31 frogs were examined, a single Dainty GREEN tree frog (L. gracilenta) adult was found to be shedding Cystodiscus spores in its faeces (1/31, 3.23%) (Figure 1A). The individual appeared in good health throughout the study (September 2011 to April 2012), with an average faecal sample weight of 10-40 mg. All two-weekly parasitological examinations were positive for Cystodiscus spores (Figure 1B). Quantitative analysis of the faecal samples revealed an average of 416 myxospores per sample (average 30 mg) (range = 147–777, mean =417, st. dev = 139, CI 95% = 352- 481). Myxospores measured 14.8 (14–16) × 8.2 (7–9) μm (n = 30), had 5–10 transverse ridges on each valve, and the presence of caudal filaments was not clearly determined. The myxospore morphology overlapped those of C. australis, 16.0 (15–18) × 8.7 (8–10) μm with 5–11 transverse ridges, and C. axonis, 14.1 (13–15.5) × 8.5 (8–10.5) μm with 5–12 transverse ridges and caudal filaments.
Figure 1

A Litoria gracilenta , the Dainty tree frog infected with Cystodiscus axonis and C. australis . B Cystodiscus myxospore in faecal smear preparation, scale 10 μm. C Multiplex species specific PCR result, 1- Positive control showing C. axonis (upper 597 bp band) and C. australis (lower 498 bp band), 2- faecal sample from L. gracilenta (positive for both C. axonis and C. australis) and 3- negative (water) control. Samples (5 μl) were run on 2% agarose gel, stained with Gel Red (Biotium, Australia) with Hyperladder II (Bioline, Australia) DNA ladder.

Multiplex species specific PCR confirmed the presence of C. axonis and C. australis (Figure 1C).

No lesions (i.e. brain inflammation, liver fibrosis, biliary hyperplasia and/or myxozoan developmental stages) consistent with infection with either Cystodiscus spp were found in the brain, liver or gall bladder or in tissues from the two White lipped tree frogs (L. infrafrenata) that died spontaneously.

Discussion

Cystodiscus parasites are associated with inflammation of nervous tissue and hepatic disease in a number of threatened and common frog species, yet the current distribution is still unknown [12]. It was demonstrated that up until the 1960’s frogs in Sydney were free of Cystodiscus parasites [4]. Their apparent emergence corresponds with improvements in roads and the increased use of refrigerated trucks, both of which could allow an increased survival of frogs that stowed away on transported material. For example, bananas have been cultivated in Australia since the 1870’s [13], with 90% of the bananas within Australia today produced in northern Queensland and distributed across the country. Large scale improvements to the transport of fresh produce around the country including the use of refrigerated trucks occurred in the second half of the last century [14]. We tested the hypothesis that frogs arriving in New South Wales in shipments of fruit and vegetables originating from other parts of Australia could be sources of Cystodiscus parasites.

Although only one infected frog was found in this small study set, its identification provides proof of concept that frogs from other geographic areas can disseminate both species of Cystodiscus to New South Wales and potentially other parts of Australia. The Dainty GREEN tree frog has a range that extends from northern New South Wales all the way to the northern tip of the east coast of Australia, it is a new host record for both Cystodiscus species. Thus it would be found in the fruit and vegetable growing areas of Queensland and therefore it is likely that this frog originated from outside of New South Wales. Our study shows that both parasites are shed in significant numbers in this translocated frog and that shedding can occur for a minimum of 8 months and thus this translocated frog and possibly others could be an important source of environmental contamination at their final destination.

Baseline data is essential for correct quarantine and health screens of any individual. Detection of myxosporean parasites can be extremely important especially if the infected host is a critically endangered species as observed in Australia’s most threatened frog, the Yellow spotted bell frog (Litoria castanea) infected with Cystodiscus axonis[15]. This study shows that both the simple non-invasive technique of faecal examination and a species specific PCR assay of faeces can be used to detect infected frogs and that both these techniques could be used in future studies to determine the full extent of Cystodiscus spp. movement in translocated frogs. Myxospores of myxosporean species are known to be resilient [16], so our data suggests that organizations rescuing frogs would benefit by being trained in reducing the risk of spread of Cystodiscus spp. and potentially other pathogens.

Conclusion

We present a possible mechanism for the emergence of Cystodiscus parasites in New South Wales and Southern Queensland, Australia with an analogous mechanism for Cystodiscus parasites in other parts of the world where fresh produce is translocated across a large geographic distance. Vigilance and communication between wildlife managers/researchers and veterinarians provides valuable information about these parasites, their host range and true distribution. These findings aid risk management assessments for threatened populations within the range of Cystodiscus spp. parasites and ultimately enhance conservation efforts. Moreover, it emphasizes how the detection of translocated frogs and the ultimate disposition of these frogs should be considered by regulatory agencies to minimize the risk that they will spread new pathogens to naive frog populations.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was in part financially supported by the Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney and Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. We thank Astrid Holzer, Karrie Rose and Ivan Fiala for discussions, Monica Wangmann at the Frog and Tadpole Study group of NSW for her help with frog collection.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Sydney
(2)
Bird & Exotics Veterinarian
(3)
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre ASCR, Laboratory of Fish Protistology

References

  1. Murray K, Skeratt L, Marantelli G, Berger L, Hunter D, Mahony M, Hines H: Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. 2011Google Scholar
  2. Hartigan A, Fiala I, Dyková I, Jirků M, Okimoto B, Rose K, Phalen DN, Šlapeta J: A suspected parasite spill-back of two novel Myxidium spp. (Myxosporea) causing disease in Australian endemic frogs found in the invasive cane toad. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e18871-10.1371/journal.pone.0018871.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hartigan A, Fiala I, Dyková I, Rose K, Phalen DN, Šlapeta J: New species of Myxosporea from frogs and resurrection of the genus Cystodiscus Lutz, 1889 for species with myxospores in gallbladders of amphibians. Parasitology. 2012, 139: 478-496. 10.1017/S0031182011002149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Hartigan A, Phalen DN, Šlapeta J: Museum material reveals a frog parasite emergence after the invasion of the cane toad in Australia. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 50-10.1186/1756-3305-3-50.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. O’Dwyer T, Buttemer WA, Priddel DM: Inadvertent translocation of amphibians in the shipment of agricultural produce into New South Wales: its extent and conservation implications. Pacific Cons Biol. 2000, 6 (1): 40-45.Google Scholar
  6. Centre AR: The Lost frogs home: An initiative of the Victorian Frog Group to rescue accidentally relocated frogs. In the spotlight. vol. 4. 2003Google Scholar
  7. Lips KR, Diffendorfer J, Mendelson JR, Sears MW: Riding the wave: Reconciling the roles of disease and climate change in amphibian declines. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6 (3): 441-454.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Skerratt L, Berger L, Speare R, Cashins S, McDonald K, Phillott A, Hines H, Kenyon N: Spread of chytridiomycosis has caused the rapid global decline and extinction of frogs. Ecohealth. 2007, 4 (2): 125-134. 10.1007/s10393-007-0093-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Dubey S, Shine R: Origin of the parasites of an invading species, the Australian cane toad (Bufo marinus): are the lungworms Australian or American?. Mol Ecol. 2008, 17 (20): 4418-4424. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03922.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks D, Mclennan DA, Leon-Regagnon V, Hoberg E: Phylogeny, ecological fitting and lung flukes: helping solve the problem of emerging infectious diseases. Rev Mexicana Biodivers. 2006, 77: 225-233.Google Scholar
  11. Fiala I: The phylogeny of Myxosporea (Myxozoa) based on small subunit ribosomal RNA gene analysis. Int J Parasitol. 2006, 36 (14): 1521-1534. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.06.016.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hartigan A, Dhand NK, Rose K, Šlapeta J, Phalen DN: Comparative pathology and ecological implications of two myxosporean parasites in native Australian frogs and the invasive Cane toad. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (10): e43780-10.1371/journal.pone.0043780.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pearson M: Tracking the Dragon: A guide for finding and assessing Chinese Australian heritage places. 2002, Canberra: In. Edited by Commission AHGoogle Scholar
  14. Scott KJ, CSIRO: Simple low cost ways to reduce wastage and extend the life of bananas after harvest. 2010, Mudgee: Scott, K.JGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartigan A, Sangster C, Rose K, Phalen DN, Šlapeta J: Myxozoan parasite in brain of critically endangered frog. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012, 18: 693-695. 10.3201/eid1804.111606.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. El-Matbouli M, Hoffmann RW: Effects of freezing, aging, and passage through the alimentary canal of predatory animals on the viability of Myxobolus cerebralis Spores. J Aquat Anim Hlth. 1991, 3 (4): 260-262. 10.1577/1548-8667(1991)003<0260:EOFAAP>2.3.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hartigan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement