Open Access

Toxicity of essential oil from Indian borage on the larvae of the African malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae

  • Eliningaya J Kweka1Email author,
  • Annadurai Senthilkumar2 and
  • Venugopalan Venkatesalu2
Parasites & Vectors20125:277

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-277

Received: 13 October 2012

Accepted: 27 November 2012

Published: 3 December 2012

Abstract

Background

Essential oils are currently studied for the control of different disease vectors, because of their efficacy on targeted organisms. In the present investigation, the larvicidal potential of essential oil extracted from Indian borage (Plectranthus amboinicus) was studied against the African anthropophagic malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae. The larvae of An. gambiae s.s laboratory colony and An. gambiae s.l of wild populations were assayed and the larval mortality was observed at 12, 24 and 48 h after exposure period with the concentrations of 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 ppm.

Findings

Larval mortality rates of the essential oil was entirely time and dose dependent. The LC50 values of the laboratory colony were 98.56 (after 12h) 55.20 (after 24 h) and 32.41 ppm (after 48 h) and the LC90 values were 147.40 (after 12h), 99.09 (after 24 h) and 98.84 ppm (after 48 h). The LC50 and LC90 values of the wild population were 119.52, 179.85 (after 12h) 67.53, 107.60 (after 24 h) and 25.51, 111.17 ppm (after 48 h) respectively. The oil showed good larvicidal potential after 48 h of exposure period against An. gambiae. The essential oil of Indian borage is a renowned natural source of larvicides for the control of the African malaria vector mosquito, An. gambiae.

Conclusion

The larvicidal efficacy shown by plant extracts against An. gambiae should be tested in semi field and small scale trials for effective compounds to supplement the existing larval control tools.

Findings

Background

Malaria is the most important parasitic disease that has created major public health problems in the tropical and sub-tropical regions, in spite of the decrease of malaria cases and vector populations. According to a global estimate from The World Health Organization (WHO), 216 million people who were infected with malaria parasites in 2010, (of which approximately 81%, or 174 million cases, were reported from Sub-Saharan African) resulted in 6, 55, 000 malaria deaths (about 91% were in Africa) [1]. Approximately 86% of malaria deaths globally were children under 5 years of age. Mosquitoes of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex are the principal and most efficient malaria vectors in the world [2]. Among the An. gambiae complex members, An. gambiae s.s. plays a wide role in transmission of the most dangerous parasite, Plasmodium falciparum in Sub-Saharan countries [2].

The use of synthetic insecticides for the control of adult anopheline mosquitoes through indoor residual house spraying and insecticide impregnated materials have shown to decrease in efficacy over time in recent years in various parts of Africa [3]. This is due to the tolerance of adult mosquitoes against synthetic insecticides used for bed nets/indoor residual spray [1] and the widespread use of a single class of insecticide increases the risk that mosquitoes will develop resistance, which could rapidly lead to a major public health problem [4]. Targeting the mosquito larval stage by using non synthetic or alternative larvicides can be of significant impact as larvae cannot move from breeding sites [5]. In recent years, searching for new mosquito control agents from natural sources such as essential oil has gained recognition among researchers in countries with a renowned biodiversity and large numbers of plants/essential oils have been reported to possess larvicidal and repellent activity [68].

Indian borage Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng] belongs to the family Lamiaceae and it grows naturally and is distributed in tropical Africa and Asia. In the previous studies of the essential oil of P. amboinicus for its chemical composition and larvicidal activity against An. stephensi[9], the oil showed marked larvicidal potential with the LC50 values of the oil being 33.54 (after 12 h) and 28.37 ppm (after 24 h) against An. stephensi[9]. Based on the previous report, the current study evaluated the toxicity of this essential oil against the laboratory colony (An. gambiae s.s) and wild populations of the African malaria vector mosquito, An. gambiae s.l.

Methods

Plant materials and extraction of essential oil

The fresh leaves of Indian borage were collected from Mangudi (11°2035 N, 079°4124 E), Cuddalore district of Tamil Nadu, India during April, 2010. The leaves were cut into small pieces and subjected to hydro distillation using a Clevenger type apparatus for 4 h. The essential oil was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and the purified essential oil was stored at +4°C for further use. The specimen voucher was deposited at the herbarium, Department of Botany, Annamalai University. The specimen voucher number is AUBOT#231.

Larval collection and rearing of mosquitoes

An. gambiae s.s. laboratory colony was reared in an insectary and maintained at 27.0 ± 2°C and relative humidity of 70 to 80%. The light regime was L 12: D 12. These females were provided with sugar solution (10% sucrose). Species identification of the An. gambiae s.s. was performed and confirmed by using polymerase chain reaction as described by the protocol of Scott et al. [10]. Eggs laid were collected on wet filter papers and kept in an incubator for 48 hours before hatching. Larvae were fed with diet of Brewer’s yeast until they developed to third instar larvae. Wild populations of larvae were sampled from natural habitats using a standard dipper of 350 ml in areas with a history of pyrethroid resistance observed in adult populations in western Kenya. Sampled larvae were sorted in an insectary and only third instar larvae of An. gambiae were used for larvicidal activity.

Mosquito larvicidal assay

The larvicidal activity was analysed as per the standard procedures recommended by the World Health Organisation [11]. The essential oil was dissolved in 1 ml of acetone and prepared in different concentrations viz., 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 ppm with distilled water. Twenty larvae (in a 20 ml beaker) of late third instar stage were used for larvicidal assay and five replicates were maintained for each concentration. Larval mortality was counted after 12, 24 and 48 h exposure and during the experimental period no food was offered to the larvae. All moribund mosquito larvae were considered as dead. The larval mortality was also checked for water and acetone individually. The lethal concentrations, LC50 and LC90 and their 95% confidence limit of upper and lower confidence levels were calculated by probit analysis in a Statistical package for social scientists, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

GC and GC-MS analysis

Gas chromatography (GC) analysis was carried out using Varian 3800 gas chromatography equipped with mass selective detector coupled to front injector type 1079. The chromatograph was fitted with DB 5 MS capillary column (30 m×0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 μm). The injector temperature was set at 280°C, and the oven temperature was initially at 45°C then programmed to 300°C at the rate of 10°C/min and finally held at 200°C for 5 min. Helium was used as a carrier gas with the flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. One microlitre of the sample (diluted with acetone 1:10) was injected in the split mode in the ratio of 1:100. The percentage of composition of the essential oil was calculated by the GC peak areas. GC–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of essential oil was performed using Varian 3800 gas chromatography equipped with Varian 1200L single quadrupole mass spectrometer. GC conditions were the same as reported for GC analysis and the same column was used. The mass spectrometer was operated in the electron impact mode at 70 eV. Ion source and transfer line temperature was kept at 250°C. The mass spectra were obtained by centroid scan of the mass range from 40 to 1,000 amu. The retention indices were calculated using a homologous series of n-alkanes, C8–C22 and n-octane was used as the internal standard. The compounds were identified based on the comparison of their retention indices (RI), retention time (RT) and mass spectra of WILEY, NIST library data of the GC-MS system and literature data [12].

Results and discussion

The analysis of the chemical contents of the samples of essential oil from P. amboinicus revealed that the essential oil had 26 compounds (Table 1). The essential oil of Indian borage showed good larvicidal toxicity (Table 2) against both An. gambiae larvae of a laboratory colony and wild populations. The laboratory colony showed 100 per cent larval mortality at 100 ppm after 48 h of exposure period. The LC50 values of essential oil against the larvae of the laboratory colony was 98.56, 55.20 and 32.41 ppm and LC90 values were 14.40, 99.09 and 98.84 ppm after 12, 24 and 48 h of exposure period respectively. The larvae of the wild population showed poor response for the essential oil after 12 h of exposure period. Even though, the essential oil showed low LC50 value (25.51 ppm) after 48 h of exposure period. The essential oil showed the LC50 values of 119.52 (after 12 h) and 67.53 ppm (after 24 h). Acetone and water showed no mortality after 24 and 48 h of exposure period. The larval mortality rate of the essential oil was entirely time and dose dependent. The results of the present study are comparable to the previous study made by Senthilkumar and Venkatesalu [9]. The essential oil of P. ambonicus showed larvicidal activity against An. stephensi reared in the laboratory with the LC50 values of 33.54 (after 12 h) and 28.37 ppm (after 24 h). The larval mortality ability of the essential oil may be accredited by the presence of Carvacrol in the essential oil [13]. The results of the present study are also similar to that of earlier investigations on larvicidal activity of essential oils. Pavela and others reported that the essential oils obtained from Thymus vulgaris, Satureja hortensis and Thymus satureioides showed the highest larvicidal effect (LC50 33, 36 and 44 μg/ml, respectively) after 24 h of exposure [14]. Stem distilled essential oil from Zingiber officinalis was evaluated for larvicidal activity against the filarial mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus. The late third instar larvae showed the LC50 value of 50.78 ppm after 24 h of treatment [15]. It is apparent from the above mentioned results, the toxicity of essential oil against different mosquito species are not uncommon due to its chemical variations [16].
Table 1

Chemical composition of the essential oil from the leaves of P. amboinicus[9]

Peak No

AI

Chemical compound

Percentage

1

788

1-octene

0.35

2

988

myrcene

0.16

3

1014

α-terpinene

0.61

4

1020

ρ-cymene

6.51

5

1025

β-phelandrene

0.11

6

1054

γ- terpinene

7.76

7

1098

trans-sabinene hydrate

0.22

8

1123

methyl octanoate

0.42

9

1165

borneol

0.26

10

1186

α-terpineol

3.28

11

1192

dihydro carvel

0.23

12

1195

methyl chavicol

0.28

13

1197

2Z-octenol acetate

0.96

14

1289

thymol

21.66

15

1298

carvacrol

29.25

16

1305

undecanal

8.29

17

1452

α-humulene

9.67

18

1489

β-selinene

2.01

19

1582

caryphyllene oxide

5.83

20

1584

2-phenyl ethyl tiglate

1.38

21

1590

β- copaen-4-α-ol

0.12

22

1608

humulene epoxide II

0.11

23

1611

tetradecanal

0.12

24

1615

β-himachalene oxide

0.15

25

1621

β-cedrene epoxide

0.03

26

1627

1-epi-cubenol

0.16

  

TOTAL

99.93

AI (Arithmetic Index) in the literature [12].

Table 2

Larvicidal activity of essential oil from Indian borage against a laboratory colony and wild population of African malarial vector mosquitoes, Anopheles gambiae s.s. after 12 and 24 hours 12, 24 and 48 h of exposure period respectively

 

Concentration (ppm)

Time

Mortality

L C50 (LCL-UCL)a

LC90 (LCL-UCL)a

X2 (df=4)b

Laboratory colony (An. gambiae s.s)

3.125

After 12 Hours

0±0.0

98.56 (76.55 – 158.18)

147.40 (112.35 – 276.75)

25.52

6.25

0±0.0

12.5

0±0.0

25

0±0.0

50

26±1.30

100

55±1.58

3.125

After 24 Hours

3±0.89

55.20 (35.26 – 96.69)

99.09 (70.65 – 203.33)

49.36

6.25

5±0.70

12.5

14±0.83

25

16±1.48

50

83±1.67

100

98±0.54

3.125

After 48 Hours

23±1.14

32.41 (8.23 – 62.40)

98.84 (66.67 – 242.69)

30.57

6.25

29±0.70

12.5

51±0.83

25

55±1.0

50

95±0.70

100

100±0.0

Wild population (An. gambiae s.l)

3.125

After 12 Hours

0±0.0

119.52 (98.53 – 164.94)

179.85 (143.12 – 268.45)

8.19

6.25

0±0.0

12.5

1±0.44

25

2±0.89

50

15±1.58

100

37±1.14

3.125

After 24 Hours

0±0.0

67.53 (55.31 – 85.22)

107.60 (88.92 – 143.21)

16.23

6.25

0±0.0

12.5

3±0.89

25

14±0.83

50

47±1.14

100

96±0.83

3.125

After 48 Hours

42±1.67

25.51 (0.25 – 46.94)

111.17 (76.91 – 238.56)

16.63

6.25

44±2.68

12.5

52±1.51

25

52±2.07

50

95±0.70

100

98±0.54

a – 95% Confidence interval.

b – Degrees of freedom.

LCL Lower Confidence level, UCL Upper Confidence level.

Malarial transmission is much more difficult to control in Africa as compared to most other places because of a complex ecological system, it can be prevented by effective vector control targeting larval habitats. Otherwise, endemic malaria cannot be eliminated from most parts of Sub-Saharan Africa [17]. In that way, the essential oil of Indian borage is a renowned natural source of larvicides for the control of the African malaria vector mosquito, An. gambiae.

Conclusion

The findings of this study have shown high mortality of An. gambiae s.l. third instar larvae caused by evaluated essential oils was dosage and time dependant. Further evaluations are ongoing for efficacy in semi field and subsequently small scale trials.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Wilberforce Onoka, Walter Mariga, Jersey Agalomba and Amos Wabwile for field larvae sampling and larvicides trials at Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu Kenya.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Livestock and Human Diseases Vector Control, Tropical Pesticides Research Institute
(2)
Department of Botany, Annamalai University

References

  1. WHO: World Malaria Report 2011. 2011, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Coetzee M: Distribution of the African malaria vectors of the Anopheles gambiae complex. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 2004, 70: 103-104.Google Scholar
  3. Osse R, Aikpon R, Padonou G, Oussou O, Yadouleton A, Akogbeto M: Evaluation of the efficacy of bendiocarb in indoor residual spraying against pyrethroid resistant malaria vectors in Benin: results of the third campaign. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 163-10.1186/1756-3305-5-163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO: World Malaria Report 2010. 2010, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  5. Amer A, Mehlhorn H: Larvicidal effects of various essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex larvae (Diptera, Culicidae). Parasitol Res. 2006, 99: 466-472. 10.1007/s00436-006-0182-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Amer A, Mehlhorn H: Repellency effect of forty-one essential oils against Aedes, Anopheles, and Culex mosquitoes. Parasitol Res. 2006, 99: 478-490. 10.1007/s00436-006-0184-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kweka EJ, Mosha FW, Lowassa A, Mahande AM, Mahande MJ, Massenga CP, Tenu F, Lyatuu EE, Mboya MA, Temu EA: Longitudinal evaluation of Ocimum and other plants effects on the feeding behavioral response of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the field in Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2008, 1: 42-10.1186/1756-3305-1-42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kweka EJ, Munga S, Mahande AM, Msangi S, Mazigo HD, Adrias AQ, Matias JR: Protective efficacy of menthol propylene glycol carbonate compared to N. N-diethyl-methylbenzamide against mosquito bites in Northern Tanzania. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 189-10.1186/1756-3305-5-189.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Senthilkumar A, Venkatesalu V: Chemical composition and larvicidal activity of the essential oil of Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng against Anopheles stephensi: a malarial vector mosquito. Parasitol Res. 2010, 107: 1275-1278. 10.1007/s00436-010-1996-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Scott JA, Brogdon WG, Collins FH: Identification of single specimens of the Anopheles gambiae complex by the polymerase chain reaction. AmJTrop Med Hyg. 1993, 49: 520-529.Google Scholar
  11. World Health Organization: 2005, http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2005/WHO_CDS_WHOPES_GCDPP_2005.13.pdf. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides
  12. Adams RP: Identification of essential oil compounds by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. 2009, Corol stream: Allured Publishing Corporation, 4Google Scholar
  13. Knio KM, Usta J, Dagher S, Zournajiam H, Kreydiyyeh S: Larvicidal activity of essential oil extracted from commonly used herbs in Lebanon against the seaside mosquito, Ochlerotatus caspius. Bioresour Technol. 2008, 99: 763-768. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Pavela R: Larvicidal property of essential oils against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Industr Crops and Prod. 2009, 30: 311-315. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.06.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Pushpanathan T, Jebanesan A, Govindarajan M: The essential oil of Zingiber officinalis Linn (Zingiberaceae) as a mosquito larvicidal and repellent agent against the filarial vector Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae). Parasitol Res. 2008, 102: 1289-1291. 10.1007/s00436-008-0907-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sukumar K, Perich MJ, Boobar LR: Botanical derivatives in mosquito control: a review. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1991, 7: 210-237.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Killeen GF, Fillinger U, Kiche I, Gouagna LC, Knols BG: Eradication of Anopheles gambiae from Brazil: lessons for malaria control in Africa?. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002, 2: 618-627. 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00397-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Kweka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement