A new focus of Aedes japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) (Diptera, Culicidae) distribution in Western Germany: rapid spread or a further introduction event?
© Kampen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 4 October 2012
Accepted: 23 November 2012
Published: 7 December 2012
The Asian bush mosquito, Aedes japonicus japonicus, a potential vector of several viruses, was first detected in Germany in 2008 on the Swiss-German border. In the following years, this invasive species apparently succeeded in establishing populations in southern Germany and in spreading northwards. In 2011, its distribution area already covered large areas of the federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg, and its northernmost German collection point was reported to be close to Stuttgart. Several independent submissions to our laboratories of Ae. j. japonicus specimens in July 2012, originating from the same area in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia, western Germany, prompted us to carry out an immediate surveillance in this region in the expectation of finding a further distribution focus of Ae. j. japonicus in Germany.
After inspecting the places of residence of the collectors of the submitted mosquito specimens, all kinds of water containers in 123 cemeteries in surrounding towns and villages were checked for mosquito developmental stages. These were collected and kept to produce adults for morphological species identification. One specimen per collection site was identified genetically by COI sequence analysis.
Aedes j. japonicus adults and immature stages were found in 36 towns/villages that were checked (29%) over an area of approximately 2,000 km2 in southern North Rhine-Westphalia and northern Rhineland Palatinate. The species could not be demonstrated further south when monitoring towards the northernmost previous collection sites in southern Germany. It therefore remains to be elucidated whether the species has entered western Germany from the south, from Belgium in the west where it has been demonstrated to occur locally since 2002, or through a new introduction.
Aedes j. japonicus is obviously much more widely distributed in Germany than previously thought. It appears to be well adapted, to have a strong expansion tendency and to replace indigenous mosquito species. Thus, a further spread is anticipated and elimination seems hardly possible anymore. The vector potency of the species should be reason enough to thoroughly monitor its future development in Germany.
KeywordsAedes japonicus japonicus Cemeteries Distribution focus Spread Western Germany
Next to the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus, the Asian bush mosquito, Aedes japonicus japonicus (Diptera, Culicidae), is one of the most expansive invasive mosquito species in the world . After the brief interception of Ae. j. japonicus, together with Ae. albopictus, in New Zealand in the early 1990s , the species was first reported to have established outside its native distribution area in 1998 in the eastern US . It was probably introduced by the international used tyre trade some years before that, and several times independently [4, 5]. Aedes j. japonicus has spread considerably since then and is now widely distributed in the eastern part of North America, including Canada . In central Europe, larvae were found in 2000 on the premises of a used tyre trading company in France, but these were quickly eliminated . In 2002, specimens were also collected at two sites in a town in central Belgium, again associated with tyre trading companies. The species still colonized that area in 2003 and 2004 and was present in 2007 and 2008 during a national Belgian mosquito survey . As specimens were never collected elsewhere in Belgium during this survey, the species was considered to be confined to the surroundings of the two companies and control did not take place until 2012. In 2008, Ae. j. japonicus appeared in northern Switzerland, and immature stages were also discovered at several sites on German territory along the Swiss-German border . Monitoring carried out in the German federal state of Baden-Wurttemberg in 2009 and 2010 showed the mosquito to occur in a broader region of southern Germany along the Swiss border . Another small study restricted to a limited area south of Stuttgart demonstrated Ae. j. japonicus in mid-2010 some 80 km north of the South German distribution area . Three hitherto unpublished findings from 2011 of five females outside the described distribution areas were made in the cities of Stuttgart, Freiburg and Breisach, approx. 20 km west of Freiburg (own results).
Aedes j. japonicus is not only an aggressive biter but a suspected or known vector of various viruses. It has repeatedly been found infected in the field with West Nile virus in the US  and efficiently transmits this virus in the laboratory [13, 14]; it was shown to be able to transmit Japanese encephalitis virus horizontally and vertically  and to be vector-competent for LaCrosse , eastern equine encephalitis  and St. Louis encephalitis viruses  under experimental conditions. Only recently it has also been demonstrated to be vector-competent for chikungunya and dengue viruses in the laboratory, two disease agents that have emerged and re-emerged in southern Europe .
In July 2012, seven specimens of Ae. j. japonicus were submitted to our laboratories for species identification. In four cases, they had been collected indoors while attacking humans. Three of the mosquitoes were sent by one and the same person, the other four by different persons independently, but all of them from the larger Bonn area in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia, West Germany. Taking these coincidences to be a strong hint that there could be a local Ae. j. japonicus population, a small monitoring programme was promptly initiated including an inspection of the mosquito collection sites and the screening of cemeteries in that area for immature stages.
The field work of the study was carried out in August 2012 within less than two weeks. To start with, the immediate surroundings of all five sites where the submitted Ae. j. japonicus adults had been collected were inspected for mosquito breeding sites. Water containers of every kind, such as flower-pot saucers, rain water barrels and paddling pools, were checked in the collectors’ gardens as well as in the neighbourhood and in the nearest cemeteries, similar to the procedure described by Schaffner et al. . To check for further distribution areas, flower vases, watering cans, stone basins and other potential breeding sites were examined in the cemeteries of towns and villages in all geographic directions from the initial detection sites. Once the bush mosquito was found in an inspected cemetery, further villages were checked in distances between 5 and 20 km, following the direction of larval presence. All visited sites were geo-referenced.
Mosquito larvae and pupae were collected by sieves and pipettes and transferred to labelled glas jars with screw tops filled with water from their breeding sites, where they were kept until adult emergence. For the purpose of collecting the emerged adults, a jar was put into a mesh insect cage where its top was removed. The mosquitoes were then collected from the cage by an aspirator and killed by deep freezing (−20°C) for 15 to 20 min. They were identified morphologically using the determination keys by Tanaka et al. , Schaffner et al.  and Becker et al. . For genetic species confirmation, the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of one specimen per collection site was PCR-amplified by primers PanCuli-COX1-211 F (5’-ATCATAATTGGTGGGTTTGGWAAYTGA-3’) and PanCuli-COX1-727R (5’-TATAAACTTCDGGRTGNCCAAARAATC-3’) and sequenced according to standard protocols .
Results and discussion
Mosquito larvae were found on all premises inspected. Aedes j. japonicus could be detected in flower vases, flower-pot saucers, watering cans, rain water barrels and a baby paddling pool, either as immature stages or as freshly emerged adults, in the gardens of four of the five senders of the original mosquitoes or in the immediate surroundings of their homes. Only at the place of residence of the fifth sender, corresponding to the easternmost collection site, no bush mosquitoes were discovered during a site inspection.
Whilst Ae. j. japonicus adults can be easily identified in the field, the larvae can also be differentiated from those of indigenous species with some reliability. They are brownish-yellow or darker, have a quite slender appearance and a moderately long siphon. Even in an advanced larval stage, their head capsule has no bright areas on the dorsal side giving the impression of a dark, more or less round shield. Eyes and mouthparts are not distinctly visible with the naked eye. The larvae spend long periods of time on the ground of their breeding site with little movement, often between debris if present, but if they move they wiggle more intensely and worm-like than the larvae of most indigenous mosquito species ([20, 24], own observation).
Using these identification criteria, the distribution area of Ae. j. japonicus was provisionally defined whilst in the field, by checking vases and other water containers in cemeteries, which had proved to be a suitable approach in other studies [9, 25]. Only after the collecting trips, which took several days each, the emerged mosquitoes were properly identified to species in the laboratory using a dissecting microscope. The GenBank accession numbers for the Ae. j. japonicus COI sequences generated for confirmation of the morphological determination are JX888952-94.
Considering the area of distribution, it can be assumed that the introduction of Ae. j. japonicus into western Germany dates back to earlier years although complaints only started in 2012 and immature stages could not be found in the infested area during occasional inspections of cemeteries in 2011 and in May 2012.
The origin of the infestation could not be resolved. Of the most obvious possibilities, a northward spread from infested areas in southern Germany (shortest direct line distance between the newly discovered distribution area and the northernmost point of previously known occurrence: approx. 250 km) or an eastward spread from the infestation area in Belgium (shortest direct line distance between the newly discovered distribution area and the Belgian town with the two infested tyre trading companies: approx. 150 km), neither could be verified under the hypothesis that a continuous, more or less linear distribution had taken place. Regions with no documentation of Ae. j. japonicus appear to exist between all three distribution areas, although distribution zones with low population densities might have been missed. Prevailing modes of dispersal, active or passive, and routes, e.g. along valleys or rivers, are unknown for this mosquito species. An accidental finding of Ae. j. japonicus larvae in 2011, however, close to the town of Schwaebisch-Hall in northeastern Baden-Wurttemberg rather suggests an active invasion from the south.
A third possibility is an additional importation event of the bush mosquito into central Europe, with subsequent establishment. The used tyre trade is no big business in Germany, but it does exist on a limited scale. Efforts to identify tyre trading companies in the newly recognized infested area are under way as well as molecular (microsatellite DNA) analyses of the mosquitoes collected in western Germany to elucidate their genetic relationships to populations from other European and non-European distribution areas.
Although the mosquito collection data from western Germany are not appropriate for ecological and epidemiological analyses, the strong impression arose that Ae. j. japonicus tends to displace and replace indigenous mosquito species, just as it appears to do in the US . Except for the peripheral sites of the infested area, where sometimes only one or two water containers with Ae. j. japonicus larvae were discovered in a cemetery, often only very few water containers, or no container at all, were occupied by larvae of other mosquito species when Ae. j. japonicus immature stages were present. This subject needs further investigation.
A more detailed and systematic monitoring for Ae. j. japonicus in western Germany, addressing questions including indigenous mosquito species displacement and speed of spread, will be carried out in 2013, taking into account the strategies suggested by the ECDC in their guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe .
Aedes j. japonicus is not considered an important vector of disease agents under natural conditions in its native geographic distribution area, Japan, Korea, Taiwan and southern China, but has been shown to be vector-competent for several highly pathogenic viruses in the laboratory. Thorough observation of the species in its new distribution areas in Europe is therefore recommended, the more so as it feeds on both birds and humans and thus might serve as a bridge vector for zoonotic disease agents reservoired by birds .
Taking into account the considerable distribution areas of Ae. j. japonicus in Switzerland and Germany, it is hardly conceivable that this invasive mosquito species could again be eliminated from central Europe. On the contrary, it seems to be very well adapted to European conditions, and a further spread is likely.
Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I.
This work was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV) through the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE), grant number 2810HS022, and by the Robert Koch Institute, grant number 1362/1-982. We are grateful to Brigitte Dannenfeld and Jutta Falland for excellent technical assistance in the laboratory, to Petra Kranz for preparing the figures and to Adrian Pont for critically reading the manuscript.
- Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Schaffner F, Versteirt V, Hendrickx G, Zeller H, van Bortel W: A review of the invasive mosquitoes in Europe: ecology, public health risks, and control options. Vector Borne Zoon Dis. 2012, 12: 435-447. 10.1089/vbz.2011.0814.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laird M, Calder L, Thornton RC, Syme R, Holder PW, Mogi M: Japanese Aedes albopictus among four mosquito species reaching New Zealand in used tires. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1994, 10: 14-23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peyton EL, Campbell SR, Candeletti TM, Romanowski M, Crans WJ: Aedes (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald), a new introduction into the United States. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1999, 15: 238-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott JJ, Carle FL, Crans WJ: Ochlerotatus japonicus collected from natural rock pools in New Jersey. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc. 2001, 17: 91-92.Google Scholar
- Fonseca DM, Widdel AK, Hutchinson M, Spichiger S-E, Kramer LD: Fine scale spatial and temporal population genetics of Aedes japonicus, an new US mosquito, reveal multiple introductions. Mol Ecol. 2010, 19: 1559-1572. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04576.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris JA, Lampman RL, Ballmes G, Funes J, Halvorsen J, Novak RJ: First record of Aedes japonicus japonicus in Illinois: defining its spatial distribution and associated mosquito species. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2007, 23: 243-251. 10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[243:FROAJJ]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaffner F, Chouin S, Guilloteau J: First record of Ochlerotatus (Finlaya) japonicus japonicus (Theobald, 1901) in metropolitan France. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003, 19: 1-5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Versteirt V, Schaffner F, Garros C, Dekoninck W, Coosemans M, van Bortel W: Introduction and establishment of the exotic mosquito species Aedes japonicus japonicus in Belgium. J Med Entomol. 2009, 46: 1464-1467. 10.1603/033.046.0632.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaffner F, Kaufmann C, Hegglin D, Mathis A: The invasive mosquito Aedes japonicus in central Europe. Med Vet Entomol. 2009, 23: 448-451. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00825.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Becker N, Huber K, Pluskota B, Kaiser A: Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus – a neozoon in Germany and a revised list of the German mosquito fauna. Eur Mosq Bull. 2011, 9: 88-102.Google Scholar
- Schneider K: Breeding of Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) 80 km north of its known range in southern Germany. Eur Mosq Bull. 2011, 29: 129-132.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control: Mosquito species producing WNV positives by year. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/mosquitospecies.htm. Accessed 30 September 2012
- Sardelis MR, Turell MJ: Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus in Frederick county, Maryland: discovery, distribution and vector competence for West Nile virus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2001, 17: 137-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Turell MJ, O’Guinn ML, Dohm DJ, Jones JW: Vector competence of North American mosquitoes for West Nile virus. J Med Entomol. 2001, 38: 130-134. 10.1603/0022-2585-38.2.130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takashima I, Rosen L: Horizontal and vertical transmission of Japanese encephalitis virus by Aedes japonicus. J Med Entomol. 1989, 26: 454-458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sardelis MR, Turell MJ, Andre RG: Laboratory transmission of La Crosse virus by Ochlerotatus j. japonicus. J Med Entomol. 2002, 39: 635-639. 10.1603/0022-2585-39.4.635.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sardelis MR, Dohm DJ, Pagac B, Andre RG, Turell MJ: Experimental transmission of eastern equine encephalitis virus by Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus. J Med Entomol. 2002, 39: 480-484. 10.1603/0022-2585-39.3.480.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sardelis MR, Turell MJ, Andre RG: Experimental transmission of St. Louis encephalitis virus by Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2003, 19: 159-162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaffner F, Vazeille M, Kaufmann C, Failloux A-B, Mathis A: Vector competence of Aedes japonicus for chikungunya and dengue viruses. Eur Mosq Bull. 2011, 29: 141-142.Google Scholar
- Tanaka K, Mizusawa K, Saugstad ES: A revision of the adult and larval mosquitoes of Japan (including the Ryukyu Archipelago and the Ogasawara Islands) and Korea (Diptera: Culicidae). Contrib Am Ent Inst. 1979, 16: 1-987.Google Scholar
- Schaffner F, Angel G, Geoffrey B, Hervy JP, Rhaiem A, Brunhes J: The mosquitoes of Europe. An identification and training programme (CD Rom). 2001, Montpellier: IRD Éditions & EID MéditerrannéeGoogle Scholar
- Becker N, Petrić D, Zgomba M, Boase C, Madon M, Dahl C, Kaiser A: Mosquitoes and their control. 2010, Heidelberg: Springer, 2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lehmann K, Werner D, Hoffmann B, Kampen H: PCR identification of culicoid biting midges (Diptera, Ceratopogonidae) of the Obsoletus complex including putative vectors of bluetongue and Schmallenberg viruses. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 213-10.1186/1756-3305-5-213.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyagi I: Notes on the Aedes (Finlaya) chrysolineatus subgroup in Japan and Korea (Diptera: Culicidae). Trop Med. 1971, 13: 141-151.Google Scholar
- Vezzani D: Artificial container-breeding mosquitoes and cemeteries: a perfect match. Trop Med Int Health. 2007, 12: 199-313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Andreadis TG, Wolfe RJ: Evidence for reduction of native mosquitoes with increased expansion of invasive Ochlerotatus japonicus japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the northeastern United States. J Med Entomol. 2010, 47: 43-52. 10.1603/033.047.0106.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control): Guidelines for the surveillance of invasive mosquitoes in Europe. 2012, ECDC Technical Report. StockholmGoogle Scholar
- Molaei G, Farajollahi A, Scott JJ, Gaugler R, Andreadis TG: Human bloodfeeding by the recently introduced mosquito, Aedes japonicus japonicus, and public health implications. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2009, 25: 210-214. 10.2987/09-0012.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.