Redescription of Hepatozoon felis (Apicomplexa: Hepatozoidae) based on phylogenetic analysis, tissue and blood form morphology, and possible transplacental transmission

  • Gad Baneth1Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Alina Sheiner1,

      Affiliated with

      • Osnat Eyal1,

        Affiliated with

        • Shelley Hahn1,

          Affiliated with

          • Jean-Pierre Beaufils2,

            Affiliated with

            • Yigal Anug3 and

              Affiliated with

              • Dalit Talmi-Frank1

                Affiliated with

                Parasites & Vectors20136:102

                DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-102

                Received: 1 February 2013

                Accepted: 23 March 2013

                Published: 15 April 2013

                Abstract

                Background

                A Hepatozoon parasite was initially reported from a cat in India in 1908 and named Leucocytozoon felis domestici. Although domestic feline hepatozoonosis has since been recorded from Europe, Africa, Asia and America, its description, classification and pathogenesis have remained vague and the distinction between different species of Hepatozoon infecting domestic and wild carnivores has been unclear. The aim of this study was to carry out a survey on domestic feline hepatozoonosis and characterize it morphologically and genetically.

                Methods

                Hepatozoon sp. DNA was amplified by PCR from the blood of 55 of 152 (36%) surveyed cats in Israel and from all blood samples of an additional 19 cats detected as parasitemic by microscopy during routine hematologic examinations. Hepatozoon sp. forms were also characterized from tissues of naturally infected cats.

                Results

                DNA sequencing determined that all cats were infected with Hepatozoon felis except for two infected by Hepatozoon canis. A significant association (p = 0.00001) was found between outdoor access and H. felis infection. H. felis meronts containing merozoites were characterized morphologically from skeletal muscles, myocardium and lungs of H. felis PCR-positive cat tissues and development from early to mature meront was described. Distinctly-shaped gamonts were observed and measured from the blood of these H. felis infected cats. Two fetuses from H. felis PCR-positive queens were positive by PCR from fetal tissue including the lung and amniotic fluid, suggesting possible transplacental transmission. Genetic analysis indicated that H. felis DNA sequences from Israeli cats clustered together with the H. felis Spain 1 and Spain 2 sequences. These cat H. felis sequences clustered separately from the feline H. canis sequences, which grouped with Israeli and foreign dog H. canis sequences. H. felis clustered distinctly from Hepatozoon spp. of other mammals. Feline hepatozoonosis caused by H. felis is mostly sub-clinical as a high proportion of the population is infected with no apparent overt clinical manifestations.

                Conclusions

                This study aimed to integrate new histopathologic, hematologic, clinical, epidemiological and genetic findings on feline hepatozoonosis and promote the understanding of this infection. The results indicate that feline infection is primarily caused by a morphologically and genetically distinct species, H. felis, which has predilection to infecting muscular tissues, and is highly prevalent in the cat population studied. The lack of previous comprehensively integrated data merits the redescription of this parasite elucidating its parasitological characteristics.

                Keywords

                Hepatozoon felis Hepatozoon canis Domestic cat Transplacental transmission

                Background

                Hepatozoon species are apicomplexan parasites with a hematophagous arthropod final host and a vertebrate intermediate host. They are transmitted by ingestion of the final host containing mature oocysts by the intermediate host [1]. The gamont stage of the parasite is found in leukocytes or erythrocytes of the intermediate host and infects the final host during the blood meal. Additional transmission pathways have been described in some Hepatozoon spp. including intrauterine transmission and carnivorism of the intermediate host by an intermediate host of a different species [25]. More than 340 species of Hepatozoon have been described to date in amphibians, reptiles, birds, marsupials and mammals [1, 6]. A Hepatozoon parasite was reported for the first time from the blood of a domestic cat in India by Patton in 1908 and named Leucocytozoon felis domestici[7]. The feline parasite was later transferred to the genus Hepatozoon and it was suggested that Hepatozoon parasites from the cat, jackal and hyena are indistinguishable from Hepatozoon canis, which infects dogs, due to the similarity in morphology of the gamont stage seen in the blood of these animals [8]. The classification of the Hepatozoon parasites found in domestic cats has thereafter been uncertain and most studies have carefully referred to Heptozoon-like parasites or Hepatozoon sp. without committing to a certain species [915]. With the advent of molecular techniques, PCR using genus-specific primers for Hepatozoon spp. was used to amplify 18S rRNA gene DNA from the blood of a collection of wild and domestic animals including 2 cats from Spain. Although no parasites were morphologically described in the cat’s blood, the sequences from these cats were designated as H. felis and deposited in GenBank [14, 16].

                Domestic cat hepatozoonosis has been reported from several countries worldwide including: India, South Africa, Nigeria, the USA, Brazil, Israel, Spain and France [7, 9, 11, 12, 1720]. Most studies have focused on reporting the detection of feline hepatozoonosis and almost no information has been published on its pathogenesis, transmission, life cycle and epidemiology. In that context, the aims of this study were to carry out a survey on domestic feline hepatozoonosis, characterize its causative agents genetically and morphologically in blood and tissues, and evaluate its possible transplacental transmission.

                Methods

                Collection of positive samples detected during routine laboratory evaluation

                Anticoagulated blood in EDTA tubes from 19 domestic cats in which Hepatozoon sp. gamonts were detected by May Grunwald Giemsa-stained blood smear microscopy at the Hebrew University Veterinary Teaching Hospital (HUVTH) and at the private Pathovet Veterinary Pathology Laboratory in Israel during routine blood tests, were collected from 2002 to 2011 and stored at – 80 C.

                Cat survey

                Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes during 2010 and 2011 from multiple locations and sources in Israel. These included convenience sampling of cats whose Hepatozoon infection status was unknown from animal shelters in 5 cities in central Israel (Tel-Aviv; Jerusalem; Rehovot; Beit Dagan; Rishon Le-Zion), cats brought for routine spay to HUVTH, cats admitted to private veterinary clinics in 5 cities and villages in Israel (Haifa; Nahariya; Carmiel; Kfar Vradim; Yodfat) and to the to the HUVTH in central Israel whose samples were taken for routine diagnostic purposes. Serum samples were also collected from the same cats. Data collected on the cats included: sex, age, source of cats (e.g. shelter or private ownership), geographic location, indoors or outdoors access, and feline immunodeficiency (FIV) status as tested during this study.

                Cats tissues for evaluation of Heptozoon sp. infection

                Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of 3 cats in which structures of Hepatozoon sp. meronts were detected by histopathology were included in the study. One cat was a patient at the HUVTH and detected antemortally as being parasitemic with Hepatozoon sp. It died with hepatitis and pancreatitis and was necropsied at the Kimron Veterinary Institute (KVI) pathology department. Fresh tissues from multiple organs were also collected from this cat at necropsy and stored at -80 C. A second cat was diagnosed with feline panleukopenia at the HUVTH and necropsied at the KVI following its death. Tissues including myocardial and skeletal muscle from a third cat diagnosed with Hepatozoon sp. infection in France [11] were submitted to the Hebrew University by its attending veterinarian.

                Fetuses from shelter queens brought to the HUVTH for spaying and found to be pregnant during the neutering procedure were frozen at -80 C and if the queen blood was found to be positive for Hepatozoon sp. by PCR, fetal tissues were dissected using separate sterile scalpels for each tissue and submitted for Hepatozoon PCR in order to detect possible intrauterine transmission.

                DNA extraction

                DNA from the blood of cats was extracted using the illustra blood genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit® (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples from paraffin-embedded tissues were deparaffinized and DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA FFPE tissue kit® (QIAgen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA from frozen tissues was extracted using the guanidine thiocyanate technique as previously described [21].

                PCR for the detection of Hepatozoon spp. and Toxoplasma gondii

                A partial fragment of the 18S rRNA gene of Hepatozoon spp. was amplified by PCR using primers Piroplasmid-F CCAGCAGCCGCGGTAATT and Piroplasmid-R CTTTCGCAGTAGTTYGTCTTTAACAAATCT [20]. The following conditions were used: 94°C 3 min, 35 cycles of [94°C 30 s, 64°C 45 s, 72°C 30 s] 72°C 7 min. PCR was performed using the Syntezza PCR-Ready High Specificity kit (Syntezza Bioscience, Israel). Positive H. canis control samples (5 μl DNA) from naturally infected dogs positive by blood smear and by PCR and sequencing of the PCR product, and negative controls were run with each PCR. This PCR protocol was used for all of the samples included in the study. Other sets of primers tried for amplification of a partial fragment of the 18S rRNA gene such as the HEP-F and HEP-R primers [22] were less successful in amplifying samples from domestic cats with hepatozoonosis.

                A second PCR assay was performed in some of the samples positive by the Piroplasmid PCR to amplify a larger segment (approximately 1400 bp) of the 18S rRNA gene of Hepatozoon spp. for further phylogenetic analysis. This assay used primers HAM-1 F GCCAGTAGTCATATGCTTGTC and HPF-2R GACTTCTCCTTCGTCTAAG [16]. The amplification conditions for this reaction were: 95°C, 5 min; (34x [95°C 20 sec, 56°C, 30 sec, 72°, 90 sec]; 72°C, 5 min). Positive H. canis control samples (5 μl DNA) from naturally infected dogs positive by blood smear and by PCR and sequencing of the PCR product, and negative controls were run with each PCR reaction.

                In order to rule out possible misdiagnosis of Hepatozoon tissue forms with Toxoplasma gondii cysts, a PCR for T. gondii was carried out on DNA extracted from tissues of the 3 cats in which Hepatozoon sp. meronts were detected by histopathology. PCR was performed to amplify a 529 bp fragment T. gondii repeat sequence using primers TOX4 CGCTGCAGGGAGGAAGACGAAAGTTG and TOX5 CGCTGCAGACACAGTGCATCTGGATT [23] as previously described [24].

                Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

                All PCR amplicons amplified from positive cats included in each part of the study were sequenced. The DNA products were sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (PerkinElmer/Applied Biosystems) and an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were evaluated with the ChromasPro software version 1.33 and compared to sequence data available from GenBank using the BLAST 2.2.9 program (http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​BLAST/​). The Hepatozoon species identity found was determined according to the closest BLAST match with an identity of 97% -100% to an existing GenBank accession. Only samples that produced amplicons with a sequence compatible with a Hepatozoon sp. were considered positive for Hepatozoon and included accordingly in the study analysis.

                A phylogenetic analysis, which included DNA sequences from the blood of 18 cats from the study, was carried out to compare these sequences to Hepatozoon spp. described in other animal hosts and in domestic cats and had previously been deposited in GenBank. Sequences were analyzed using the MEGA version 3.0 (http://​www.​megasoftware.​net) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Maximum-Likelihood, Minimum-Evolution and the Neighbor-Joining algorithms using the Kimura2-parameter model. Bootstrap replicates were performed to estimate the node reliability, and values were obtained from 1000 randomly selected samples of the aligned sequence data.

                Parasite morphology and sizes

                The sizes of parasites found in blood smear and histologic specimens were measured by a manual micrometer and light microscope.

                FIV serology

                Detection of antibodies for FIV in cat sera was performed using the Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Immuno Run Antibody Detection assay® (Biogal Galed Labs, Israel).

                Statistical analysis

                Data was analyzed using the Chi-Square, Fisher’s Exact and the Mann-Whitney tests. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the HUVTH research projects study evaluation committee.

                Results

                Evaluation of positive blood smear Hepatozoon spp. sample collection

                All 19 cat samples identified by blood smear microscopy during 2002-2011 and collected at the HUVTH were positive by PCR for Hepatozoon sp. using the Piroplasmid primers followed by DNA sequencing.

                Cat survey

                Hepatozoon sp. DNA was amplified from the blood of 55 out of the 152 (36.2%) surveyed cats whose Hepatozoon infection status was unknown using the Piroplsamid PCR protocol.

                The sex of the cat was recorded for 146 of the 152 survey cats. Seventy-five were males (51.4%) of which 30 (40%) were PCR+ for Hepatozoon and 71 were female (48.6%) of which 24 (33.8%) were PCR+. Sex was not found to be significantly associated (p = 0.438) with positivity for Hepatozoon infection in the surveyed cats using the Chi square test. The age was known for 126 surveyed cats for which the mean age and standard deviation (SD) were 4.6 ± 4.2 years with a range of 4 months to 18 years. No significant association (p = 0.453) was found between age and Hepatozoon positivity using the Mann-Whitney test.

                Information on access to the outdoors was available for 132 cats. Ninety-two (68.7%) of the cats were outdoors or spent a part of the day outdoors of which 45 (48.9%) were PCR+ for Hepatozoon, whereas 42 (31.3%) were strictly indoor cats of which only 4 (9.5%) were PCR+. A significant association (p = 0.00001) was found between outdoor access and Hepatozoon positivity using the Chi square test.

                Of the 101 cats belonging to private owners, 39 (38.6%) were PCR+ for Hepatozoon and of the 51 non-privately owned cats, 16 (31.4%) were PCR+. No significant association (p = 0.475) was found between cat ownership status and Hepatozoon positivity using the Chi square test. Likewise, when dividing the cats to those who originated from northern Israel (from Haifa northward) to those who were from central Israel, 29 of 67 (43.3%) cats from northern Israel were PCR+ for Hepatozoon and 26 of 85 (30.6%) cats from central Israel were PCR+ with no significant association (p = 0.854) found between the cat geographic origin and Hepatozoon positivity using the Chi square test.

                Sera was only available from 64 cats for FIV testing. Fifty-four of these cats (84.4%) were negative for FIV of which 22 (40.7%) were PCR+ for Hepatozoon, and 10 (15.6%) cats were positive for FIV of which 6 (60%) were Hepatozoon PCR+. No significant statistical association (p = 0.312) was found between FIV and Hepatozoon infections using the Fisher exact test.

                PCR on cat tissues

                Hepatozoon sp. DNA was amplified from paraffin-embedded tissues of 3 cats using PCR with the Piroplsamid primers. The first cat was detected antemortally at the HUVTH as being parasitemic with Hepatozoon sp. and at necropsy followed by tissue histopathology, it was described to be cachectic with chronic hepatitis and chronic pancreatitis. Hepatozoon sp. meronts were detected by histopathology in the skeletal muscles (semi-membranosus muscle of the hind limb) and in the myocardium of this cat. PCR carried out on DNA of paraffin embedded tissues from both the semi-membranosus and myocardial muscles was positive and sequenced. In addition, Hepatozoon PCR of fresh tissues collected at necropsy was positive for the lingual muscle (tongue), diaphragm muscle, longissimus dorsi muscle, semi-membranosus muscle, myocardium, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, lung, mesenteric lymph node and bone marrow. Hepatozoon PCR was also positive from blood taken antemortally.

                The second cat diagnosed with feline panleukopenia had severe necrotizing enteritis and pneumonia by histopathology. Hepatozoon sp. meronts were detected in its myocardium and lungs by histopathology and these two tissues were also positive for Hepatozoon by PCR and sequencing.

                Tissues from the third cat were sent from France where it was reported to have feline leukemia virus (FeLV) infection, Hepatozoon sp. parasitemia, and forms compatible with Hepatozoon meronts in its muscular tissues by histopathology [11]. Both the myocardium and skeletal muscles were positive for Hepatozoon by PCR and sequencing in the current study.

                Tissues from all the 3 cats positive for Hepatozoon by PCR were PCR-negative for T. gondii.

                Detection of Hepatozoon DNA in fetal samples

                Fetuses from 3 Hepatozoon blood PCR + shelter queens brought to the HUVTH for spay, included in the survey and found pregnant during neutering were tested by PCR for Hepatozoon DNA using the Piroplasmid primers. Uteri from 2 cats contained 3 and 4 relatively developed fetuses, respectively, from which lungs, liver, spleen, skeletal muscle from a back limb, cardiac muscle, naval tissue and amniotic fluid were collected from each embryo. The third uterus contained 4 small less developed fetuses from which abdominal cavity organ material and amniotic fluid were sampled. None of the fetuses from the uterus with 3 large embryos were positive for Hepatozoon by PCR. However, one developed fetus from the uterus with 4 fetuses was positive in the lung and amniotic fluid, and one of 4 less developed fetuses from the third uterus was positive in the amniotic fluid. In total, tissues from 2 of 11 fetuses were positive for Hepatozoon sp. by PCR.

                Genetic identity and phylogenetic analysis GenBank accessions

                A 358 bp fragment of the Hepatozoon 18S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using the Piroplasmid primers from the blood and tissues of all cats considered infected in this study. DNA sequencing revealed that all positive cats, except for two, had a sequence whose closest match by BLAST, with an identity of 97%-100%, was an H. felis GenBank accession. Most sequences were 98%-100% identical to H. felis [GenBank:AY628681] (H. felis isolate Spain 2 [16]). The DNA sequences similar to H. felis included those obtained from the 55 positive survey cats, sequences from all cats from which paraffin embedded or fresh frozen tissues were tested, and sequences from 17 of the 19 cats included in the collection of samples identified by blood smear microscopy during 2002-2011. The Hepatozoon sequence obtained from the blood of the cat in which infection was detected antemortally and also in necropsy tissue was 99% identical to H. felis [GenBank:AY628681]. The sequence amplified from the paraffin-embedded myocardial tissue of the French cat with hepatozoonosis was also 99% identical to H. felis [GenBank:AY628681] as was the sequence amplified from the paraffin-embedded myocardial tissue of the local cat with panleukopenia, and a sequence amplified from the amniotic fluid of a fetus from a blood-positive queen. Only 2 cats had DNA sequences that matched H. canis and not H. felis. Samples 9617 and 9618 from the collection of positive blood smear spp. were 99% identical to H. canis [GenBank:EU289222] and other H. canis accessions. Although the piroplasmid primers can also amplify DNA from piroplasms such as Babesia spp., none of the amplified sequences were positive for Babesia, Theileria or Cytauxzoon spp.

                Further investigation of the genetic identity of Hepatozoon parasites found in cats from this study was carried out using the HAM-1 F and HPF-2R primers which amplified a 1400 bp fragment of the H. felis 18S rRNA gene. Amplification of this large fragment of the 18S rRNA gene was carried out for selected samples included in the phylogenetic analyses. In addition to the DNA sequences from cats, fragments of H. canis from local Israeli dogs were also amplified using the two sets of primers and sequenced in order to compare H. felis and H. canis from cats with a local H. canis from dogs. Details on Hepatozoon sequences from this study submitted to GenBank are included in Table 1.
                Table 1

                Description of new Hepatozoon spp. sequences from the study deposited in GenBank

                Source and sample number

                Hepatozoon species

                Primers used for amplification of 18S rRNA gene fragment

                GenBank accession number

                Cat 9617

                H. canis

                HAM-1 F and HPF-2R*

                KC138531

                Cat 9618

                H. canis

                HAM-1 F and HPF-2R*

                KC138532

                Cat 8533

                H. felis

                HAM-1 F and HPF-2R*

                KC138533

                Cat 1

                H. felis

                HAM-1 F and HPF-2R*

                KC138534

                Dog 7243

                H. canis

                HAM-1 F and HPF-2R*

                KC138535

                Cat 9685

                H. felis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138536

                Dog 6417

                H. canis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138537

                Dog 8672

                H. canis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138538

                Cat 9617

                H. canis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138539

                Cat 9618

                H. canis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138540

                Cat 1778

                H. felis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138541

                Cat 8987

                H. felis

                Piroplasmid-F and Piroplasmid-R**

                KC138542

                * [16]; ** [20].

                A Neighbor Joining phylogenetic tree based on 345 bp from the shorter 18S rRNA fragment amplified by the Piroplasmid primers (Figure 1) indicated that sequences from 14 Israeli cats detected as infected with H. felis clustered with H. felis [GenBank:AY628681] (H. felis isolate Spain 2), whereas the H. canis sequences found in 2 cats from the study clustered together with H. canis from dogs. Similar clustering was obtained also with the Maximum-Likelihood and the Minimum-Evolution algorithms. A Maximum Likelihood tree based on 970 bp from the longer 18S rRNA fragment amplified by primers HAM-1 F and HPF-2R (Figure 2) also indicated that H. felis sequences from Israeli cats clustered together with the H. felis Spain1 and Spain 2 sequences. Likewise, H. canis from 2 Israeli cats clustered together with H. canis [GenBank:AY461378] from a dog in Spain. These were separated from H. americanum and Hepatozoon spp. reported from other animal hosts.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig1_HTML.jpg
                Figure 1

                Neighbor Joining 18S rRNA Tree; A Neighbor Joining tree phylogram comparing 345 bp 18S rRNA DNA Hepatozoon sequences from Israeli cats to other Hepatozoon GenBank deposited sequences with Babesia vogeli and Babesia canis as outgroups. The GenBank accession numbers, species of infected animals and country of origin from which the sequences were derived are included for each sequence. New GenBank accessions derived from the present study are indicated in bold letters.

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig2_HTML.jpg
                Figure 2

                Long 18S rRNA segment Minimum Evolution Tree; A Minimum Evolution tree phylogram comparing 970 bp 18S rRNA DNA Hepatozoon sequences from Israeli cats to other Hepatozoon GenBank deposited sequences with Isospora belli as outgroup. The GenBank accession numbers, species of infected animals and country of origin from which the sequences were derived are included for each sequence. New GenBank accessions derived from the present study are indicated in bold letters.

                Parasite morphology and sizes

                The life stages visible in the blood and tissues of cats positive for H. felis by PCR were visualized by microscopy and measured (Table 2). Gamonts observed in stained blood smears were located in the cytoplasm of neutrophils and monocytes sometimes compressing the lobulated host cell nucleus. Gamonts were elongated, enveloped by a visible membrane and possessed a round acentric nucleus (Figure 3). Some gamonts contained basophilic staining granules. In comparison to H. canis gamonts from dog blood, gamonts of H. felis were different due to their generally round nucleus, which is dissimilar to the more elongated horse-shoe shaped H. canis nucleus. They were also relatively shorter with a mean length of 10.5 μm compared with the H. canis gamont which is 11 μm long [25] and less conspicuous within the feline leukocyte than H. canis within its canine counterpart. The H. felis gamont was often hardly apparent within the host cell cytoplasm and almost concealed by its nucleus.
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig3_HTML.jpg
                Figure 3

                Hepatozoon felis gamont; A H. felis gamont in a monocyte from the blood smear of a cat co-infected with Mycoplasma hemofelis . May Grunwald-Giemsa stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                Table 2

                Sizes of Hepatozoon felis life stages

                Stage

                Source of sample

                Mean size (μm) with SD

                Shape index (length/width ratio)

                Number measured

                Gamont

                Cat blood

                10.5 ± 0.6 x 4.7 ± 0.8

                2.2

                13

                Gamont nucleus

                Cat blood

                4 ± 0.3 x 3.2 ± 0.5

                1.2

                12

                Meront

                Skeletal muscle; myocardium; lung

                39 ± 5 x 34.5 ± 3.8

                1.1

                13

                Meront capsule width

                Skeletal muscle; myocardium; lung

                1.4 ± 0.5

                Not applicable

                13

                Merozoites

                Skeletal muscle; myocardium; lung

                7.5 ± 0.6 x 1.9 ± 0.3

                3.9

                14

                Merozoite nucleus

                Skeletal muscle; myocardium; lung

                2.4 ± 0.5 x 1.6 ± 0.3

                1.5

                14

                The H. felis meront is round to oval with a mean length of 39 μm by 34.5 μm and surrounded by a thick membrane separating it from the surrounding tissue (Table 2). The early H. felis meronts contain amorphous material without obvious zoites (Figure 4), and as they mature they form nuclei (Figure 5), which develop further into distinct intact long merozoites with a rectangular nucleus that assumes the whole width of the merozoite (Figures 6 and 7). The H. felis merozoites are dispersed within the meront without an obvious pattern of arrangement. Early H. felis meronts appear to have thinner capsules that widen and become thicker as the meront matures. No apparent inflammatory response was found associated with the presence of intact meronts in muscular tissues (Figure 8).
                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig4_HTML.jpg
                Figure 4

                Early Hepatozoon felis meront; An early H. felis meront in the myocardial muscle of a domestic cat. Hematoxylin & Eosin stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig5_HTML.jpg
                Figure 5

                Maturing Hepatoon felis meront; A maturing H. felis meront in the myocardial muscle of a domestic cat. Note that merozoite nuclei are visible but distinct merozoites are not formed yet at this stage. Hematoxylin & Eosin stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig6_HTML.jpg
                Figure 6

                Hepatozoon felis meronts; Two maturing H. felis meronts in the myocardial muscle of a domestic cat. Individual merozoites with separate nuclei are visible in the lower meront. Hematoxylin & Eosin stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig7_HTML.jpg
                Figure 7

                Mature Hepatozoon felis meront in lung. A mature H. felis meront in the lung of a cat with pneumonia and panleukopenia. Note the individual nucleated separated merzoites and thick external capsule. Hematoxylin & Eosin stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                http://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-102/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_899_Fig8_HTML.jpg
                Figure 8

                Hepatozoon felis meronts in striated muscle. Two maturing H. felis meronts in the semi-membranosus skeletal muscle. No host inflammatory cells are visible in the tissue adjacent to the parasites. Hematoxylin & Eosin stain, Bar = 10 μm.

                The H. felis meront is larger in size than the H. canis meront which is 30.6x 28.9 μm [26], found in muscular tissues such as the myocardium and skeletal muscles, unlike H. canis which infects hemolymphoid and parenchymal tissues, but not muscles. Furthermore, the H. felis meront does not form the typical wheel spoke shape of the H. canis meront with merozoites arranged in a circle along the meront circumference around a central core [26].

                Discussion

                Although hepatozoonosis of domestic cats was initially reported in 1908, the same year when the type species Hepatozoon muris was described from a laboratory rat and its life cycle described [27], it has almost been overlooked since and little has been published on its pathogenesis. This study aimed to integrate new histopathologic, hematologic, clinical, epidemiological and genetic findings on feline hepatozoonosis and promote the understanding of this infection. The results clearly indicate that feline infection is primarily caused by a morphologically and genetically distinct species, H. felis, which has predilection to infecting muscular tissues, and is highly prevalent in the cat population studied. The lack of previous comprehensively integrated data merits the redescription of this parasite elucidating its parasitological characteristics.

                Surveys of Hepatozoon sp. infection in domestic cats describe variable rates of infection in different areas. A study of myocardium specimens from 100 cats brought to necropsy in Israel found that 36% of cats harbored cardiac Hepatozoon-like meronts [9]. Interestingly, this was the same rate of infection found in Israel almost 40 years later in the current study, indicating that feline hepatozoonosis is not a new emerging infection in this country. Studies using PCR detection from Spain have shown diverse prevalence rates with 0.6% in one study [16], 16% in a cat colony from Barcelona [14], and 4% in cats from the Barcelona area [20]. A comparative study carried out in several districts of Bangkok, Thailand, where both canine and feline hepatozoonosis are prevalent, has reported a high infection rate of 32% in 300 cats by PCR. A positive association was found between the rates of infected dogs and cats in the same districts and 18S rDNA sequences from cats and dogs were closest to H. canis[28]. These findings encouraged the authors to hypothesize that H. canis was the cause of both canine and feline infections. However, the genetic analyses in this study were probably made before the sequences designated as H. felis were deposited in GenBank [16]. Therefore, the identity of some feline sequences may have been misinterpreted. A study from Brazil evaluated 200 blood samples from Sao Luis in Brazil and found only one cat infected with a Hepatozoon sp. which clustered with H. felis on a phylogenetic analysis [15].

                The lack of association between age and infection found in the study supports the possibility of transplacental transmission and kittens being born already infected. It may also suggest intensive exposure at a young age. The highly significant association found between infection and access to outdoors suggests the possibility of transmission by arthropod vectors, such as fleas, ticks or mites, which are common ectoparasites of cats globally, or by carnivorism as described for a number of Hepatozoon spp. [25]. So far, no arthropod vector has been described for H. felis. Other Hepatozoon spp. have been demonstrated to be transmitted by fleas, ticks, mites, lice, mosquitoes and sandflies [1] and it is therefore expected that H. felis would also be transmitted by an hematophagous arthropod. The existence of more than one route of transmission for H. felis is also optional as other Hepatozoon spp. have been shown to be transmitted both by arthropod vectors and by additional routes, for instance H. canis is transmitted by the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus as well as transplacentally [3, 29], and H. americanum is transmitted by the tick Amblyomma maculatum and by carnivorism [5, 30].

                The level of parasitaemia is usually low in feline hepatozoonosis with less than 1% of the neutrophils and monocytes containing gamonts [10]. A survey from Thailand found that parasitemia was detected by light microscopy of blood smears in only 0.7% of 300 cats, while 32% were positive by sensitive PCR [28]. Furthermore, none of the blood smears from 100 Israeli cats of which 36% were positive for cardiac Hepatozoon sp. meronts, had evident gamonts [9]. This study also found a higher infection rate in the myocardium of apparently healthy cats compared to sick cats [9]. Feline hepatozoonosis seems to be mostly sub-clinical as a high proportion of the population is infected with no apparent overt clinical manifestations. The seven cats described in a case series of feline hepatozoonosis suffered from various other infections including FIV, FeLV and hemotropic mycoplasmosis [10]. Although no significant association was found in the present study between FIV infection and Hepatozoon infection, this could be due to the small number of samples included, as proportionally, more FIV+ cats were infected with Hepatozoon than FIV negative cats. FIV or FeLV infections have also been described in conjunction with feline hepatozoonosis in other studies [11, 14]. It is therefore probable that Hepatozoon infection may escape control by the immune-system in immune-suppressed cats, allowing the intensification of parasitemia and increasing the likelihood of detection by blood smear microscopy [10, 11]. The reason for not testing the cats in the study for FeLV infection is the relatively low prevalence of this infection in local Israeli cats [31].

                Feline hepatozoonosis is associated mostly with infection of muscle tissues. Hepatozoon sp. meronts have been reported in the muscles of domestic cats with hepatozoonosis [9, 11], and elevated activities of the muscle enzyme creatine kinase were found in the majority of cats with hepatozoonosis in a retrospective study of this infection [10]. The genetic and morphologic findings of this study clearly showed that it is H. felis which infects myocardial and skeletal cat muscles, and not another Hepatozoon sp. However, other tissues such as the lungs were also infected with meronts, and PCR detected the presence of the parasite’s DNA in hemolymphoid organs such as the spleen, bone marrow and lymph nodes, and in the liver, pancreas, and kidney, as well as in fetal lungs and amniotic fluid. No substantial inflammatory response surrounding meronts was seen in the muscles examined in this study, as well in the other reports [9, 11]. This is in agreement with the generally sub-clinical nature of this infection. Infection of muscle tissues by Hepatozoon sp. has also been reported in wildlife felids and carnivores where H. felis or closely related species are responsible for myositis and myocarditis [3235]. Hepatozoon americanum infection of dogs and wildlife in the USA also has a predilection to muscle tissue, like H. felis, differing substantially from H. canis in dogs, which is found mostly in the hemolymphoid tissues and does not directly infect muscle. However, H. americanum induces the formation of muscle cysts which are much larger than H. felis meronts, are composed of concentric layers of muco-polysaccharide material surrounding a core zoite in a formation described as “onion skin” cysts, and elicit severe and painful pyogranulomatous myositis following merogony [24, 36, 37].

                The phylogenetic placement of 18S rRNA Hepatozoon sequences amplified from domestic cats in this study revealed that both H. felis and H. canis infect cats in Israel, although H. felis is by far more common. Israeli H. felis sequences are indistinguishable from those reported from Spain and Brazil, and closely related to those reported in wildlife felids and carnivores from India, Korea, Japan, Tanzania, Brazil and Argentina [15, 16, 3335, 3840]. It is obvious that H. felis clusters away from H. canis and other Hepatozoon species, and is responsible for infection of domestic cats and likely also of other carnivores.

                It is most likely that H. felis is the predominant species of Hepatozoon that infects domestic cats and wild felids globally. Its wide geographic distribution could be due to transmission by some ubiquitous vector such as a common flea, mite or tick species, or to highly successful alternative routes of transmission such as transplacental transmission or carnivorism of a yet unknown wildlife intermediate host. Hepatozoon canis has been shown to spread rapidly in a young dog shelter population, and it is possible that H. felis may also spread rapidly under similar conditions [41].

                Conclusions

                Merging of morphologic and genetic findings on H. felis from multiple tissues and blood of the same cats, in conjunction with a broad-based epidemiological study, facilitated detailed characterization and redescription of this species in its intermediate host, the domestic cat. Further studies are needed to elucidate its definitive host, likely an arthropod vector, and other transmission pathways with transplacental transmission as a probable option.

                Declarations

                Acknowledgements

                We thank all the veterinarians from the HUVTH who helped to collect samples from cats, Drs. Sigal Riten, Orly Harari, and Lilach Zadik, Prof. Shmuel Perl from the KVI Pathology department, Dr. Harold Salant for performing the T. gondii PCR and helping to collect samples, Maria Griber and Tamar Shapiro from the HUVTH lab.

                Authors’ Affiliations

                (1)
                School of Veterinary Medicine, Hebrew University
                (2)
                Clinique Vétérinaire
                (3)
                Pathovet LTD

                References

                1. Smith TG: The genus Hepatozoon (Apicomplexa: Adeleina). J Parasitol. 1996, 82: 565-585. 10.2307/3283781.View ArticlePubMed
                2. Landau I, Michel JC, Chabaud AG, Brygoo ER: Cycle biologique d’Hepatozoon domergeui; discussion sur les caracte‘res fondamentaux d’un cycle de coccidie. Z Parasitenkd. 1972, 38: 250-270. 10.1007/BF00329601.View ArticlePubMed
                3. Murata T, Inoue M, Tateyama S, Taura Y, Nakama S: Vertical transmission of Hepatozoon canis in dogs. J Vet Med Sci. 1993, 55: 867-868. 10.1292/jvms.55.867.View ArticlePubMed
                4. Smith TG, Desser SS, Martin DS: The development of Hepatozoon sipedon n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Adeleina: Hepatozooidae) in its natural host, the northern water snake (Nerodia sipedon sipedon), the culicine vectors, Culex pipiens and Culex territans, and an intermediate host, the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens). Parasitol Res. 1994, 80: 559-568. 10.1007/BF00933003.View ArticlePubMed
                5. Johnson EM, Panciera RJ, Allen KE, Sheets ME, Beal JD, Ewing SA, Little SE: Alternate pathway of infection with Hepatozoon americanum and the epidemiologic importance of predation. J Vet Intern Med. 2009, 23: 1315-1318. 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2009.0375.x.View ArticlePubMed
                6. Baneth G: Perspectives on canine and feline hepatozoonosis. Vet Parasitol. 2011, 181: 3-11. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.015.View ArticlePubMed
                7. Patton WS: The haemogregarines of mammals and reptiles. Parasitology. 1908, 1: 318-321. 10.1017/S0031182000003620.View Article
                8. Wenyon CM: Protozoology: A Manual for Medical Men Veterinarians and Zoologists. 1926, New York: William Wood, 1085-1095.View Article
                9. Klopfer U, Nobel TA, Neuman F: Hepatozoon-like parasite (schizonts) in the myocardium of the domestic cat. Vet Pathol. 1973, 10: 185-190. 10.1177/030098587301000301.View ArticlePubMed
                10. Baneth G, Aroch I, Tal N, Harrus S: Hepatozoon species infection in domestic cats: a retrospective study. Vet Parasitol. 1998, 79: 123-133. 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00160-5.View ArticlePubMed
                11. Beaufils JP, Martin-Granel J, Jumelle P: Hepatozoon spp. parasitemia and feline leukemia virus infection in two cats. Feline Parctice. 1998, 26: 10-13.
                12. Perez RR, Rubini AS, O’Dwyer LH: The first report of Hepatozoon spp. (Apicomplexa, Hepatozoidae) in domestic cats from São Paulo state. Brazil Parasitol Res. 2004, 94: 83-85. 10.1007/s00436-004-1167-8.View ArticlePubMed
                13. Rubini AS, Dos Santos Paduan K, Perez RR, Ribolla PE, O’Dwyer LH: Molecular characterization of feline Hepatozoon species from Brazil. Vet Parasitol. 2006, 137: 168-171. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.12.008.View ArticlePubMed
                14. Ortuño A, Castellà J, Criado-Fornelio A, Buling A, Barba-Carretero JC: Molecular detection of a Hepatozoon species in stray cats from a feline colony in North-eastern Spain. Vet J. 2008, 177: 134-135. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.04.009.View ArticlePubMed
                15. De Bortoli CP, André MR, Braga Mdo S, Machado RZ: Molecular characterization of Hepatozoon sp. in cats from São Luís Island, Maranhão, Northeastern Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2011, 109: 1189-1192. 10.1007/s00436-011-2376-6.View ArticlePubMed
                16. Criado-Fornelio A, Ruas JL, Casado N, Farias NA, Soares MP, Müller G, Brumt JG, Berne ME, Buling-Saraña A, Barba-Carretero JC: New molecular data on mammalian Hepatozoon species (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina) from Brazil and Spain. J Parasitol. 2006, 92: 93-99. 10.1645/GE-464R.1.View ArticlePubMed
                17. Leeflang P, Ilemobade AA: Tick-borne diseases of domestic mammals in northern Nigeria. Trop Anim Prod. 1977, 9: 211-218. 10.1007/BF02240342.View Article
                18. Ewing GO: Granulomatous cholangiohepatitis in a cat due to a protozoan parasite resembling Hepatozoon canis. Feline Pract. 1977, 7: 37-40.
                19. Van Amstel S: Hepatozoonose in n’ Kat. J S Afr Vet Med Assoc. 1979, 50: 215-216.
                20. Tabar MD, Altet L, Francino O, Sánchez A, Ferrer L, Roura X: Vector-borne infections in cats: Molecular study in Barcelona area (Spain). Vet Parasitol. 2008, 151: 332-336. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.10.019.View ArticlePubMed
                21. Höss M, Pääbo S: DNA extraction from Pleistocene bones by a silica-based purification method. Nucleic Acids Res. 1993, 21: 3913-3914. 10.1093/nar/21.16.3913.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                22. Inokuma H, Okuda M, Ohno K, Shimoda K, Onishi T: Analysis of the 18SrRNA gene sequence of a Hepatozoon detected in two Japanese dogs. Vet Parasitol. 2002, 106: 265-271. 10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00065-1.View ArticlePubMed
                23. Homan WL, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H: Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol. 2000, 30: 69-75. 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00170-8.View ArticlePubMed
                24. Salant H, Hamburger J, King R, Baneth G: Toxoplasma gondii prevalence in Israeli crows and Griffon vultures. Vet Parasitol. 2013, 91: 23-28.View Article
                25. Vincent-Johnson NA, Macintire DK, Lindsay DS, Lenz SD, Baneth G, Shkap V, Blagburn BL: A new Hepatozoon species from dogs: description of the causative agent of canine hepatozoonosis in North America. J Parasitol. 1997, 83: 1165-1172. 10.2307/3284379.View ArticlePubMed
                26. Baneth G, Samish M, Shkap V: Life cycle of Hepatozoon canis (Apicomplexa: Adeleorina: hepatozoidae) in the tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus and domestic dog (Canis familiaris). J Parasitol. 2007, 93: 283-299. 10.1645/GE-494R.1.View ArticlePubMed
                27. Miller WW: Hepatozoon perniciosum n. g., n. sp., a haemogregarine pathogenic for white rats; with a brief description of the sexual cycle in the intermediate host, a mite (Laelaps echidninus Berlese). Bull Hyg Lab Washington. 1908, 46: 51-123.
                28. Jittapalapong S, Rungphisutthipongse O, Maruyama S, Schaefer JJ, Stich RW: Detection of Hepatozoon canis in stray dogs and cats in Bangkok, Thailand. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006, 1081: 479-488. 10.1196/annals.1373.071.View ArticlePubMed
                29. Baneth G, Samish M, Alekseev E, Aroch I, Shkap V: Transmission of Hepatozoon canis to dogs by naturally-fed or percutaneously injected Rhipicephalus sanguineus ticks. J Parasitol. 2001, 87: 606-611.View ArticlePubMed
                30. Mathew JS, Ewing SA, Panciera RJ, Woods JP: Experimental transmission of Hepatozoon americanum Vincent-Johnson et al., 1997 to dogs by the Gulf Coast tick, Amblyomma maculatum Koch. Vet Parasitol. 1998, 80: 1-14. 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00189-7.View ArticlePubMed
                31. Baneth G, Kass PH, Steinfeld D, Besser M: A seroepidemiological study of feline coronavirus, feline immunodeficiency virus and feline leukemia virus among cats in Israel. Israel J Vet Med. 1999, 54: 39-43.
                32. Kubo M, Miyoshi N, Yasuda N: Hepatozoonosis in two species of Japanese wild cat. J Vet Med Sci. 2006, 68: 833-837. 10.1292/jvms.68.833.View ArticlePubMed
                33. East ML, Wibbelt G, Lieckfeldt D, Ludwig A, Goller K, Wilhelm K, Schares G, Thierer D, Hofer H: A Hepatozoon species genetically distinct from H. canis infecting spotted hyenas in the Serengeti ecosystem, Tanzania. J Wildl Dis. 2008, 44: 45-52.View ArticlePubMed
                34. Kubo M, Jeong A, Kim SI, Kim YJ, Lee H, Kimura J, Agatsuma T, Sakai H, Yanai T: The first report of Hepatozoon species infection in leopard cats (Prionailurus bengalensis) in Korea. J Parasitol. 2010, 96: 437-439. 10.1645/GE-2270.1.View ArticlePubMed
                35. Giannitti F, Diab SS, Uzal FA, Fresneda K, Rossi D, Talmi-Frank D, Baneth G: Infection with a Hepatozoon sp. closely related to Hepatozoon felis in a wild Pampas gray fox (Lycalopex -Pseudalopex -gymnocercus) co-infected with canine distemper virus. Vet Parasitol. 2012, 186: 497-502. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.006.View ArticlePubMed
                36. Ewing SA, Panciera RJ: American canine hepatozoonosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003, 16: 688-697. 10.1128/CMR.16.4.688-697.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
                37. Cummings CA, Panciera RJ, Kocan KM, Mathew JS, Ewing SA: Characterization of stages of Hepatozoon americanum and of parasitized canine host cells. Vet Pathol. 2005, 42: 788-796. 10.1354/vp.42-6-788.View ArticlePubMed
                38. Metzger B, Dos Santos Paduan K, Rubini AS, De Oliveira TG, Pereira C, O'Dwyer LH: The first report of Hepatozoon sp. (Apicomplexa: Hepatozoidae) in neotropical felids from Brazi. Vet Parasitol. 2008, 152: 28-33. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.006.View ArticlePubMed
                39. Sakuma M, Nishio T, Nakanishi N, Izawa M, Asari Y, Okamura M, Shimokawa Miyama T, Setoguchi A, Endo Y: A case of Iriomote cat (Prionailurus bengalensis iriomotensis) with Hepatozoon felis parasitemia. J Vet Med Sci. 2011, 73: 1381-1384. 10.1292/jvms.11-0210.View ArticlePubMed
                40. Pawar RM, Poornachandar A, Srinivas P, Rao KR, Lakshmikantan U, Shivaji S: Molecular characterization of Hepatozoon spp. infection in endangered Indian wild felids and canids. Vet Parasitol. 2012, 186: 475-479. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.11.036.View ArticlePubMed
                41. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Weigl S, Latrofa MS, Stanneck D, Decaprariis D, Capelli G, Baneth G: Diagnosis of Hepatozoon canis in young dogs by cytology and PCR. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 55-10.1186/1756-3305-4-55.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed

                Copyright

                © Baneth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.