Open Access

Spatial disaggregation of tick occurrence and ecology at a local scale as a preliminary step for spatial surveillance of tick-borne diseases: general framework and health implications in Belgium

  • Valerie Obsomer1, 2Email author,
  • Marc Wirtgen3,
  • Annick Linden3,
  • Edwin Claerebout4,
  • Paul Heyman5,
  • Dieter Heylen6,
  • Maxime Madder7, 8,
  • Jo Maris9,
  • Maude Lebrun10,
  • Wesley Tack11,
  • Laetitia Lempereur12,
  • Thierry Hance2 and
  • Georges Van Impe2
Parasites & Vectors20136:190

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-190

Received: 25 May 2013

Accepted: 16 June 2013

Published: 22 June 2013

Abstract

Background

The incidence of tick-borne diseases is increasing in Europe. Sub national information on tick distribution, ecology and vector status is often lacking. However, precise location of infection risk can lead to better targeted prevention measures, surveillance and control.

Methods

In this context, the current paper compiled geolocated tick occurrences in Belgium, a country where tick-borne disease has received little attention, in order to highlight the potential value of spatial approaches and draw some recommendations for future research priorities.

Results

Mapping of 89,289 ticks over 654 sites revealed that ticks such as Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes hexagonus are largely present while Dermacentor reticulatus has a patchy distribution. Suspected hot spots of tick diversity might favor pathogen exchanges and suspected hot spots of I. ricinus abundance might increase human-vector contact locally. This underlines the necessity to map pathogens and ticks in detail. While I. ricinus is the main vector, I. hexagonus is a vector and reservoir of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., which is active the whole year and is also found in urban settings. This and other nidiculous species bite humans less frequently, but seem to harbour pathogens. Their role in maintaining a pathogenic cycle within the wildlife merits investigation as they might facilitate transmission to humans if co-occurring with I. ricinus. Many micro-organisms are found abroad in tick species present in Belgium. Most have not been recorded locally but have not been searched for. Some are transmitted directly at the time of the bite, suggesting promotion of tick avoidance additionally to tick removal.

Conclusion

This countrywide approach to tick-borne diseases has helped delineate recommendations for future research priorities necessary to design public health policies aimed at spatially integrating the major components of the ecological cycle of tick-borne diseases. A systematic survey of tick species and associated pathogens is called for in Europe, as well as better characterisation of species interaction in the ecology of tick-borne diseases, those being all tick species, pathogens, hosts and other species which might play a role in tick-borne diseases complex ecosystems.

Keywords

Tick Vector Spatial distribution Ecology Vector-borne diseases

Background

The incidence of tick-borne diseases is increasing in Europe [1] and follows an increase in the number of tick bites [2] attributed to two factors: abundance of questing ticks and human exposure to ticks [3]. Measures targeting human exposure by promoting timely removal of ticks failed to stop the rise in Lyme borreliosis incidence in the Netherlands. On the other hand, this rise was related to an increase in Ixodes ricinus abundance [3]. Knowing the local variations in the distribution of the species interacting in tick-borne diseases systems, including ticks, pathogens and species influencing the presence and abundance of ticks and pathogens, could provide new opportunities to estimate potential infection risks locally, identify local hot spots and develop targeted prevention, surveillance and control.

Necessary information is lacking at national and sub national levels in many countries. The first missing information concerns the presence and distribution of tick species. Efforts to characterise tick distribution on a European scale [46] are limited by the information available at sub national level and only target major vectors such as I. ricinus. Other tick species less willingly biting humans sometimes harbour high pathogen prevalence’s and might contribute locally to the pathogens’ cycles [7]. The role of all tick species present should be investigated jointly per pathogen and their distribution clarified. The second missing information concerns the spatial distribution of hosts, predators and species influencing tick populations and pathogens’ prevalence in ticks. The presence and abundance of tick species varies locally according to many factors, including host availability [3]. Pathogen prevalence in ticks also varies locally according to availability of reservoirs, dead-end hosts and vectors [8]. The third set of missing information concerns pathogens associated to ticks, their presence, reservoirs, vectors and distribution. Pathogens found using classical PCR methods are those searched for, while others might be present but undetected. Because micro-organisms are increasingly found in ticks, a more systematic approach is needed. The list of micro-organisms found locally or abroad in local tick species could be narrowed by clarifying pathogenicity, vector capacity and presence of reservoirs to provide a list of potential pathogens to investigate locally. This would clarify the spectrum of pathogens potentially transmitted locally through a tick bite.

In this paper, occurrence records and information on tick species relevant for public health have been compiled for a country where tick-borne diseases received little attention. In Belgium, the limited quality of current information is obvious because of proximity to the Netherlands, a country that stands out for efficient investigations of tick-borne diseases. In the Netherlands, tick bites are subject to spatial monitoring [9]. Lyme borreliosis is monitored by physician surveys targeting Erythema migrans, the most common symptom [2]. In Belgium, only Lyme borreliosis is regularly diagnosed. In 2009, official numbers of cases varied from 500 to 1500 [10] or 9000 cases [11] according to the source. In the Netherlands, 22000 cases were recorded for that same year [2]. I. ricinus is believed to occur in Southeast Belgium but records occur elsewhere. Detailed distribution can approximate local exposure to ticks. This is of direct public health interest because according to European guidelines for Lyme borreliosis, an individual presenting an Erythema migrans is considered a confirmed case if potentially exposed to areas favourable for vector ticks [12]. Laboratory confirmation and remembering a tick bite are not necessary to confirm this diagnosis.

This study aims to show how an integrated spatial approach on tick species in a given country can provide the preliminary information needed for adapted national public health policies by providing: 1) a list of tick species present and their detailed distribution, 2) the micro-organisms they could harbour, 3) ecological traits influencing vector status, 4) implications for public health and suggestions for future research priorities.

Methods

Three sources of tick locations were considered: new tick collections, literature collections and “grey datasets”. Quality levels are proposed for each record to document for example accuracy of tick location according to type of host/vegetation (lower if captured on moving animals such as dog or deer). Information on localisation, collection, vegetation or host, pathogen load, and original data source were compiled in an excel database (Additional file 1). A systematic literature search was made based on ISI web of knowledge using the keywords “tick AND ecology” from 1989 to 2001 and “tick” from 2002 to 2011. Additional articles resulted from a specific search on presence and pathogenicity of microorganisms found in ticks. The database and additional literature articles form the basis for this paper and are examined for the following items: geographical distribution, species behaviour, ecology, presence of micro-organisms. Consequences for public health and prevention are highlighted. For some sites additional details were provided by authors, however, the methodology is already described in published articles and summarised in the Additional file 1. This includes (1) Collection BAYER, 579 sites [13], (2) Collection RLVBD, 51 sites [14], (3) Collection UGENT FOREST, 33 sites [15, 16], (4) Collection ARSIA, 17 sites [17], (5) Collection UCLIREC, 5 sites [18], and (6) Collection UA1, 16 sites [7, 1922]. Collection GREY DATA includes tick field observations from the website of NATAGORA and NATUURPUNT (http://www.observations.be, http://www.waarnemingen.be) by registered users involved with nature related activities from 1980 until February 2012. Methodologies for original tick collections are described in detail below:

Collection VANIMPE

In the framework of the convention 5284a funded by IRSIA (Institut pour l′encouragement de la recherche dans l′industrie et l′agriculture), the center of acarology (UCL) led two collection campaigns in the Campine, the plateau brabançon and the Condroz. The regions were selected based on local Lyme borreliosis cases and favourable tick habitat. The first campaign in 1989 targeted 30 sites and the second campaign prospected 234 sites from May to October 1990 including 79 days of prospection. Ticks were collected from the environment by flagging. Each collection lasted 2 hours and UTM coordinates were checked on maps (100 m).

Collection WILDSCREEN

From 2007 to 2009, ticks from wild cervids (Cervus elaphus and Capreolus capreolus) found dead, hunted or killed for sanitary reasons were collected by the Wild Screen Network disease monitoring activities in Southern Belgium [23]. Ticks were preserved in 70% ethanol at room temperature, and morphologically identified up to stage and species level (by L. Lempereur and A. Nahayo). Sex and repletion were recorded. Dermacentor reticulatus was also collected on wild cervids from 2010 to 2012. As D. reticulatus and D. marginatus may show overlapping phenotypes [24], a PCR was used for confirmation, targeting the Dermacentor second Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 (ITS2) with the following primers: ITS_forward (5′-GTG-CGT-CCG-TCG-ACT-CGT-TTT-GA-3′) and ITS_reverse (5′-ACG-GCG-GAC-TAC-GAC-GGA-ATG-C-3′) [25]. The DNA purification was carried out using the NucleoSpin tissue kit for tissue protocol (Macherey-Nagel GmbH, Germany). Samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized on a Tissue Lyser® (Qiagen, GmbH, Germany). PCR conditions were as follow: each reaction was carried out in 50 μL volume containing 4 μl of the DNA preparation, 5 μl of each 2 mM dNTP, 2 μl of each 10 μM oligonucleotide primer, 2 U of TaqDNA polymerase (New England Bio labs) with 5 μl of the 10x PCR supplied buffer and completed to 50 μl with sterile water. PCR was achieved with an initial denaturation cycle at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles (94°C, 45 s), annealing (53°C, 45 s), extension (72°C, 70 s) and a final extension step at 72°C for 10 min. All ITS2 PCR products were sequenced using a modified Sanger method with the Big Dye terminator kit version 3.1 and resolved with a 3730 ABI capillary sequencer (Applied Bio systems). Sequencing reaction was performed with the same primers as for the PCR and sequences aligned by BLAST search.

Collection ITG

Ticks were collected by flagging for several years (site 1, 60, 172).

Collection IRSNB

Additional tick locations registered in museum collections were provided by the IRSNB (Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique).

Collection DGZ

While investigating anaplasmosis in 11 farms in Flanders, in 2011, the Dierengezonheidzorg (DGZ – Animal Health Care Flanders, Belgium) recorded I. ricinus ticks on several animals from those 11 farms.

Collection GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Ticks were captured by flagging in 1999 in 3 sites in Belgium (sites 228, 242, 353).

Collection MARTIN

D. reticulatus was found on a human around Namur and a trypanosome discovered in the intestine of I. ricinus in the context of other research [26].

Collection UGENT VETE

The clinic of poultry diseases of Ghent University performs diagnosis required by individuals. In this framework they recorded a tick infestation on a pigeon from Argas species, probably Argas reflexus in July 2012 near Berlaar (site 303) in the province of Antwerp.

Results and discussion

The database includes 1624 records for a total of 89,289 ticks and is summarized per collection in Table 1. Records within 3 km range were grouped for the display in 654 sites. Original details are available for each record (Additional file 1) and can be visualised using Google Earth (Additional file 2). Figure 1 shows sites of occurrence for all tick species.
Table 1

Tick species found in Belgium per collection

 

Species

Number of species

Number of ticks

Number of records

 

Ixodes ricinus (1801/395)

   
 

Ixodes hexagonus (634/164)

   
 

Dermacentor reticulatus (18/5)

   

Collection BAYER

Rhipicephalus sanguineus (6/5)

4

2264

577

 

Ixodes ricinus (868/271)

   
 

Dermacentor reticulatus (297/10)

   

Collection GREY DATA

Ixodes lividus (5/1)

3

1170

282

 

Ixodes ricinus (43150/175)

   
 

Ixodes lividus (7/2)

   
 

Ixodes hexagonus (792/33)

   
 

Rhipicephalus sanguineus (97/13)

   
 

Argas reflexus (17/7)

   
 

Argas vespertilionis (9/3)

   
 

Hyalomma aegyptium (26/4)

   
 

Ixodes acuminatus (1/1)

   
 

Ixodes arboricola (190/3)

   
 

Ixodes canisuga (2/1)

   
 

Ixodes frontalis (7/4)

   
 

Ixodes trianguliceps (9/8)

   

Collection LITERATURE

Ixodes vespertilionis (29/11)

13

44,655

273

 

Ixodes ricinus (5819/192)

   
 

Ixodes hexagonus (1/1)

   

Collection VANIMPE

Rhipicephalus sanguineus (1/1)

3

5821

194

 

Ixodes ricinus (2232/87)

   

Collection WILDSCREEN

Dermacentor reticulatus (159/11)

2

2391

98

 

Ixodes ricinus (4000/8)

   
 

Dermacentor reticulatus (66/66)

   

Collection ITG

Ixodes frontalis (2/2)

3

4068

76

Collection RLVBD

Ixodes ricinus (22435/45)

1

22,435

45

 

Ixodes ricinus (2670/5)

   
 

Ixodes hexagonus (1/1)

   
 

Ixodes arboricola (2790/12)

   

Collection UA

Ixodes lividus (18/2)

4

5571

29

Collection ARSIA

Ixodes ricinus (600/17)

1

600

17

 

Ixodes ricinus (6/4)

   
 

Ixodes hexagonus (4/2)

   
 

Dermacentor reticulatus (2/1)

   
 

Argas vespertilionis (5/1)

   
 

Dermacentor reticulatus (2/1)

   
 

Ixodes canisuga (1/1)

   
 

Ixodes frontalis (1/1)

   
 

Ixodes trianguliceps (1/1)

   

Collection IRSNB

Ixodes vespertilionis (18/4)

9

38

15

Collection DGZ

Ixodes ricinus (11/11)

1

11

11

Collection GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Ixodes ricinus (167/3)

1

167

3

 

Ixodes ricinus (1/1)

   

Collection MARTIN

Dermacentor reticulatus (1/1)

2

2

2

Collection UGENT

Argas reflexus (1/1)

1

1

1

TOTAL

 

14

89289

1624

Species collected (number of ticks per species / number of location records per species), number of species, number of ticks and number of location recorded per collection. When the number of collected ticks is unknown the value is set to 1. (Details in Additional file 1).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-190/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_994_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map of tick species recorded in Belgium before 2011. Map of existing tick species records in Belgium. One color corresponds to one species. When two or more species occur at the same site special symbols compile the colors of the two or more species. I. ricinus is in black color. Numbers labelling each site correspond to site number in Additional file 1.

Tick species in Belgium

Fourteen species were recorded in Belgium and 10 additional species are suspected to be present because they were recorded in surrounding areas [2732] (Table 2). I. ricinus (Linnaeus, 1758) and I. hexagonus (Leach 1815) are widely distributed (Figure 1). I. ricinus is found in all the provinces. I. hexagonus is also present in all provinces and is known to be more abundant than I. ricinus in specific settings such as urban gardens [33]. These species are also the easiest to catch through flagging (I. ricinus) or because they are present on pets investigated by veterinarian surveys. Other species records are sporadic and difficult to interpret. Those records might reflect patchy distribution for ticks associated with bat habitats for example, or just lack of systematic surveys for the recently investigated D. reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) [34]. The distribution of species with 20 or fewer occurrences is difficult to analyse. Areas without records are due to absence or absence of surveys, thus leading to difficulties in the interpretation of the data.
Table 2

Tick species of Belgium

Tick name

Records in BE (Ticks)

Year for last record

NL

NW EU

N FR

GE

Established in the wild

      

Ixodes ricinus

1223 (88758)

2011

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ixodes hexagonus

201(1333)

1987

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Dermacentor reticulatus

102 (861)

2012

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ixodes frontalis

16 (102)

2011

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes arboricola

15(2980)

2011

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes lividus

5 (30)

1989

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes canisuga

2 (3)

1945

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes trianguliceps

9 (10)

1987

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes acuminatus

1 (1)

1987

 

Yes

  

Argas reflexus

8 (18)

2012

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Argas vespertilionis

4 (14)

1942

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Ixodes vespertilionis

15 (47)

1969

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Established in houses and recurrently imported on host

      

Rhipicephalus sanguineus

19 (104)

1982

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Not established but recurrently imported on host

      

Hyalomma aegyptium

4 (26)

(1965)

Yes

Yes

  

Potentially present but never found in Belgium

      

Ixodes unicavatus

Potential

Never

Yes

Yes

Maybe

No

Ixodes uriae

Potential

Never

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Ixodes ventalloi

Potential

Never

 

Yes

Yes

 

Ixodes apronophorus

Potential

Never

Yes

Yes (UK)

 

Yes

Ixodes rugicollis

Potential

Never

  

Yes

 

Ixodes simplex

Potential

Never

   

Yes

Dermacentor marginatus

Potential

(1973)

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Haemaphysalis punctata

Potential

Never

Yes

Yes (UK)

Yes

Yes

Haemaphysalis concinna

Potential

Never

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

Haemaphysalis inermis

Potential

Never

 

Yes

Yes

 

List of tick species in Belgium (BE), the Netherlands (NL), North Western Europe (NW EU) including the United Kingdom (UK), North France (N FR) and Germany (GE). Number of records in BE (Total numbers collected include available records for larvae, nymphs and adult stages). Some collectors, however, do not collect the larvae even if they are present. The year of the last records is in brackets if only found on hosts from import. Other species are present in surrounding countries but were not considered because they are very rare (Rhipicephalus bursa, Amblyoma variegatum) or specific to host species rare in Belgium (Ixodes unicavatus, Ixodes rotchildi, Ixodes caledonicus, Ornithodoros maritimus).

Most tick species are nidiculous and thus found mainly on hosts, nests or burrows. Off host habitats are important for I. ricinus and D. reticulatus which quest on the vegetation. I. ricinus is found in deciduous forests, pastures bordered by trees, hedges and bushes [35], or with tall grass and high humidity [27], vegetated sand dunes [3], pine forests [14] and city parks [36]. Contradictory definitions of D. reticulatus habitats exist in the literature [32] with D. reticulatus found in drier areas than I. ricinus[37] or in moist areas along rivers [38] or on the fringe of meadows in dry vegetation [39] and variation in abundance in similar sites [40]. Many vertebrates are parasitized by I. ricinus (Table 3). I. hexagonus is present on many mammals but never birds [39]. Other species seem restricted to specific hosts such as birds (I. frontalis (Panzer, 1798), I. arboricola Schulze & Schlottke, 1930, Argas reflexus (Fabricius, 1794), I. lividus Koch, 1844), rodents (I. trianguliceps Birula, 1895, I. acuminatus Neumann, 1901), mammals (I. canisuga Johnston, 1849, D. reticulatus) or bats (Argas vespertilionis (Latreille, 1796), I. vespertilionis Koch, 1844). Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) is imported on dogs and found occasionally in houses. Hyalomma aegyptium (Linnaeus, 1758) is imported on tortoises. Names are such as revised by Barker and Murrell [41] or used by Petney el al. [32]. While seasonality might be linked to host life cycle for bat ticks, most nidiculous ticks seem active year round (Table 4). I. ricinus is more frequently recorded in spring and autumn but the decrease in summer seems to be an artefact due to vegetation stages influencing flagging efficiency [42]. Slight activity occurs in winter. D. reticulatus seems mainly absent on the vegetation in summer.
Table 3

Tick hosts and ecology in Belgium (details in Additional file 2 )

 

host

off hostOOff

I. ricinus

Canis lupus familiaris, Felis silvestris catus, Erinaceus europaeus, Bos taurus, Homo sapiens, Capreolus capreolus, Carduelis chloris, Cervus elaphus, Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus, Anthus pratensis, Anthus trivialis, Apodemus sylvaticus, Clethrionomys glareolus, Erithacus rubecula, Hippolais icterina, Sturnus vulgaris, Talpea europaea, Turdus ericetorum, Phylloscopus erolius, Turdus pilaris, Turdus merula, Phylloscopus inornatus, Turdus iliacus, Sitta europea, Ficedula hypoleuca, Fringilla coelebs, Lacerta vivipara, Bubo bubo

Plant species: Fagus sylvatica, Carpinus betulus(hornbeam), Betula pendula (birch), Quercus robur (oak), Quercus petraea (oak), Castanea sativa, Anemone nemorosa, Convallaria majalis, Prunus padus, Pteridium aquilinum, Athyrium filix-femina, Calamagrostis epigejos, Calluna vulgaris, Cytisus scoparius, Dryopteris filix-mas, Sorbus aucuparia, Cytisus scoparius, Holcus lanatus, Holcus mollis, Juncus effusus, Molinia caerulea, Persicaria hydropiper, Urtica dioica, Acer pseudoplatanus, Convallaria majalis, Maianthemum bifolium, Carpinus sp.., Corylus avellana, Cerasus sp, Sambucus nigra,Crataegus monogyna, Vaccinium myrtillus / Pinus, Hedera helix, Rubus fructicosus, Quercus robur & Carpinus sp., Molinia caerulea

  

Soils: loam or silt with limestone, clay and limestone or schists, leaf litter, schist in Famenne, limestone from Givet, sandstone, poor acid sandy soils, siliceous rock, nettles, impermeable clay soils

  

Habitat: grazed pasture, forest ecotone, mixed acidophilous to acidophilous oak stands, birch stand with eagle fern, grassy path, garden, urban parcs, forest, dense thicket of beech, forest secondary pine poor acid sandy soils

D. reticulatus

Capreolus capreolus, Cervus elaphus, Homo sapiens, Canis lupus familiaris

Plant species: grasses, hawthorn, blackthorn (Prunus spinosa), brambles blackberry (Rubus fruticosus), birch (Betula pendula), mixture of grasses, hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), woodland (mainly Picea abies), ferns (Pteridium aquilinum), jennets (Genista scorpius), oak (Quercus robur)

  

Habitat: Fallow land, marshland, pasture used for grazing, woodland open

I. hexagonus

Felis silvestris catus, Canis lupus familiaris, Ericaneus europeus, Cervus elaphus, mustela putorius

Rabbit burrow, in herbis, in grassy nest, in house, burrow of Meles meles, endolithe nest of Coloeus monedula, pasture with edges or forest, impermeable clay soils, cave, burrow of fox

I. canisuga

Polecat: Mustela putorius

Riparian nest

I. trianguliceps

Rodents, Rattus rattus, Rattus norvegicus, Apodemus sylvaticus, Clethrionomys glareolus

Burrow of rodents

I. acuminatus

Rodents: Apodemus sylvaticus

 

I. frontalis

Birds: Parus major, Turdus merula, Sylvia atricapilla, Cyanistes caeruleus, Sturnus vulgaris, Parus montanus, Turdus viscivoru

It is sometimes found in understorey vegetation, experimental nest box

I. arboricola

Birds: Parus major, Cyanistes caeruleus, Sitta europea, Corvus monedula

Occurs in particular in bird nests inside cavities (like tree-holes for example), nest, Delichon urbica nest, experimental nest box

I. lividus

Birds: Riparia riparia

Riparia riparia (nest)

R. sanguineus

Canis lupus familiaris

house

A. reflexus

Columba livia

flat, house, dovecot

A.. vespertilionis

Bats: Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Eptesicus serotinus, rhinocephalus hipposideros

 

I. vespertilionis

Bats: Rhinolophus hipposideros, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Barbastelle, Myotis myotis

Cave wall and on stalagmites

H.aegyptium

Tortoise: Testudo graeca, Testudo mauritanica

 
Table 4

Seasonality of tick observations (number of ticks) in Belgium

 

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

I. ricinus

2

22

1008

851

2333

1288

1979

1559

978

948

158

60

D. reticulatus

150

12

1

2

   

1

1

38

117

2

I. hexagonus

4

 

2

13

9

32

13

13

 

1

3

 

I. canisuga

  

1

2

        

I. trianguliceps

1

 

1

 

1

2

   

2

2

 

I. acuminatus

    

1

       

I. frontalis

    

1

  

10

5

1

1

 

I. arboricola

1

1

   

196

    

1

 

I. lividus

  

3

 

13

 

14

     

R. sanguineus

    

6

  

49

    

A. reflexus

     

5

100

1

1

 

1

 

A. vespertilionis

   

4

       

3

I. vespertilionis

5

4

11

2

 

1

8

 

2

   

H. aegyptium

    

22

2

    

2

 

Co-occurrence of tick species in some sites raises the question of potential interactions with species recorded together on the same hosts [33], or their eggs found in the same shelter [43, 44]. Sites with high diversity of tick species might be hot spots of potential micro-organism exchanges. Indeed, although ticks specific, for example, to birds rarely bite humans, they might maintain a cycle of pathogens in their host populations. Those might be picked up by the generalist species I. ricinus, and passed onto humans [7, 45]. The possibility that co-occurring exotic and local species might facilitate establishment of exotic micro-organisms should be investigated.

Microorganisms associated to tick species

In addition to potential paralysis caused by the saliva of some female ticks, which seems very rare in Europe [46], the main impact of ticks on human health is through transmission of pathogens. Ticks acquire microorganisms through an infected meal or transovarial transmission. Micro-organisms recorded in ticks might come from a recent blood meal and presence in a tick does not mean that this tick species is a competent vector. For Ixodidae ticks feeding once per stage, the microorganisms need to survive molting and be transmitted to the next host while argasidae nymphs and adults bite repeatedly. Then, to be a pathogenic for humans, they must cause symptoms in humans. A list of 300 recorded micro-organism/tick associations is presented in Additional file 3. Some sources have a low reliability but this exhaustive list is a basis for systematic investigations and reliability of vector status and pathogenicity are compiled to propose priorities for investigations. Associations are recorded mostly outside Belgium as this was little investigated in the country. Notably, while mycoplasmas are increasingly related to ticks in the USA [47], and their prevalence is increasing throughout Europe [48, 49], there are no investigations of Mycoplasma in Belgian tick species in the literature.

For ticks present in Belgium, more than 100 associations with tick-borne (suspected) pathogens have been documented (Table 5) with some recorded in Belgium (Figure 2). Pathogenic Borrelia (Borrelia burgdorferi s.s., B. valaisana, B. garinii, B. afzelii, B. spielmanii), Anaplasma phagocythophilum and suspected pathogens such as Borrelia lusitaniae and Rickettsia (R. helvetica, Rickettsia sp., R. massilae) seem to be present throughout the country. Transovarial transmission of some Babesia species including Babesia divergens[50], B venatorum[51], (but not B. microti) [52] occurs in I. ricinus. A Babesia belt goes from Couvin (site 212) to Verviers (site 667) and has been documented for many years [53]. Other sites are based on ticks found on dogs and the place of infection is unsure, but a local focus of Babesia canis exists near Mons [54]. Some sites show a high diversity with more than 5 (suspected) pathogens. In site 575 (Genk), 481 (Ham) and 271 (Boortmeerbeek), high diversity might be linked to the presence of many ticks from many hosts. This means that (1) those localities have a higher diversity of (suspected) pathogens or (2) diversity is high everywhere but picked up there because of abundant tick material, or (3) diversity is high when ticks are abundant. Site 575 presents five pathogens (Borreliae burgdorferi s.s., B. valaisiana, B. afzelii, B. garinii and A. phagocytophilum) and three suspected pathogens (B. lusitaniae, Rickettsia helvetica and Rickettsia sp.) found in ticks collected from 38 cats (quite sedentary), thus suggesting a potential local transmission. Most interestingly, 4 pathogens (A. phagocytophilum, B. burgdorferi s.s., B. afzelii, B. garinii) and two suspected pathogens (Babesia sp., Anaplasma sp.) were recorded from unfed I. ricinus nymphs (135 ticks) during flagging at site 297 (Vierves-sur-Viroin), highlighting vector status and local presence of the pathogens. This area seems to be a hot spot of I. ricinus abundance and the only place with up to 6 potential pathogens recorded in unfed questing ticks. Site 64 (Chercq) stands out with 5 cats harbouring 60 I. ricinus but no pathogens.
Table 5

Tick/micro-organism associations for which pathogenic status and vector status for human should be investigated as a priority: pathogens and suspected pathogens/tick species associations found abroad or in Belgium referenced in the literature for tick species found in Belgium

Tick species

V/U

Borrelia

Babesia

Rickettsia

Coxiella, Franciscella Anaplasma

Virus

Other

I. ricinus

V

burgdorferi sensu stricto * , afzelii * , garinii *, lusitaniae valaisiana * , spielmanii *, sp bavariensis *, miyamotoi*,

venatorum * , divergens * , microti *

helvetica

F. tularensis* A. phagocytophilum *

CCHF*, TBEV*, Louping Ill*

 
 

U

ruskii

bovis, bigemina, rodhaini

prowazekii*, conorii * , slovaca*, monacensis*, felis*, massiliae*, typhi*, sp.

C. burnetii *

WNV*, Eyack*, Erve* Tettnang*, Tribec*, KEMV*

Bartonella henselae*, Serratia marcescens*, Staphylococcus aureus*, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis*, Toxoplasma gondii*, Pasteurella pneumotropica*, Chromobacterium violaceum*, Pseudomonas aeruginosa*, Diplorickettsia massilinsis

I. frontalis

U

afzelii * , garinii * , turdi-like burgdorferi sensu lato,

  

C. burnetii*

KEMV*, TBEV*

Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis*

I. acuminatus

U

burgdorferi sensu lato

  

C. burnetii* F. tularensis*

Bhanja

 

I. hexagonus

V

burgdorferi sensu lato

   

TBEV*

 
 

U

burgdorferi sensu stricto *, valaisiana *, spielmanii *, garinii *, afzelii *, lusitaniae , bavariensis*

microti*, bovis

conorii*, helvetica , sp.

A. phagocytophilum *

Erve*

 

I. arboricola

U

garinii * , valaisiana * afzelii * , burgdorferi sensu lato, spielmanii *

 

helvetica, sp.

 

TBEV*

 

I. lividus

U

burgdorferi sensu stricto*, garinii*

 

(heilongjiangensis), sp.

C. burnetii*

TBEV* Kama

 

I. canisuga

U

burgdorferi sensu lato

   

TBEV*

Yersinia pestis (Plague) *

I. trianguliceps

V

 

microti*

    
 

U

burgdorferi sensu lato, afzelii*, garinii*

  

C. burnetii*, F. tularensis* A. phagocytophilum*

Louping-ill*, TBEV*, CCHF*

 

I. vespertilionis

U

    

Kul, TBEV*

 

D. reticulatus

V

 

microti*

sibirica*

C. burnetii*

OHF*

 
 

U

burgdorferi sensu lato

divergens* bigemina

slovaka*, canada*, conorii*, sp, helvetica*, raoultii*

F. tularensis* Francisella-like A. phagocytophilum *

TBEV*

Bartonella henselae*

R. sanguineus

V

  

conorii*

 

CCHF*

 
 

U

burgdorferi sensu lato

microti-like*, gibsoni

Candidatus rickettsia kulagini, massiliae *, canis, felis*, rickettsi*, rhipicephali,

C. burnetii*, A. phagocytophilum*

Thogoto*

Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia ewingii Hepatozoon canis, Salmonella bacteria, Batonella vinsonii, Rangelia vitalii, Dipetalonema dracunculoides, Mycoplasma haemocanis, Leishmania infantum

A. reflexus

U

   

C. burnetii*

WNV*, TBEV*, NYMV, QRFV

 

A. vespertilionis

U

burgdorferi sensu lato, borrelia sp

  

C. burnetii*

rabies*, IK (KTR),SOK

Wolbachia persica, Treponoma vespertilionis

H. aegyptium

U

turcica, sp

  

C. burnetii*

  

V confirmed vector, U unknown vector status, * recognised pathogen, WNV West Nile Virus, CCHF Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic fever, TBEV Tick borne Encephalitis virus, QRFV Quaranfi Virus, NYMV Nyamanini virus, KTR Ketera virus, OHF Omsk Hemorrhagic fever, SOK Sokolok, IK Issyk Kul, KEMV Kemerovo. In bold pathogen recorded in Belgium. Details in Additional file 3.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-190/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_994_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Map of the micro-organisms, suspected pathogens and pathogens found in ticks of Belgium. Map of existing information on micro-organisms found in ticks in Belgium. Information is presented at the genus level but if available, details of species are provided in additional file 2. Numbers labelling each site correspond to site number in Additional file 1.

Ecological traits influencing the potential vector role of tick species

The major vector I. ricinus – a generalist species

I. ricinus is a confirmed vector for many human pathogens (Table 5). Several factors contribute to the efficiency of I. ricinus[55]: (1) it is the most abundant tick species in Europe with all stages readily biting humans [56]. (2) This species takes one meal on 3 different hosts in one life cycle and parasitizes a wide range of hosts from mammals (e.g. squirrels, badgers, wild boars, cervids, foxes, dogs, cats, cows, rodents, bats) to birds (common blackbird, European robin, pheasant, nest of the Eagle owl), reptiles, lizards and amphibians [5759]. Larvae and nymphs are found on any hosts and frequently on rodents or birds [60, 61]. Adults feed on larger mammals. A large range of hosts means that there are opportunities to encounter many pathogens and disperse in many habitats, with for example I. ricinus representing 20% of ticks found on Parus major[7]. (3) Phenologic plasticity is wide with all stages surviving 2 weeks under water, several ticks surviving at -10°C, and non engorged nymphs kept alive several months in a fridge (5°C) waking up in minutes if heated by hand contact. The species is vulnerable to desiccation and will not be encountered in arid or non-vegetated environments. Temperatures over 35°C for two weeks will kill all stages [35]. Tolerance to desiccation can be higher in ticks infected by pathogens [62]. This species walks on average 40 cm around its questing post and finds shelter in litter or soil cracks [35]. While ticks interrupt questing to move down the vegetation, in order to rehydrate (quiescence), Perret et al. discovered that after dark, quiescence was often interrupted by walking events not necessarily leading to questing, with ticks walking repeatedly 9 m. They suggested that some of these movements represent horizontal walks if the ticks were not confined to their experimental vertical channels and that some of these movements represent activities that enable ticks to find a favourable questing site in nature [63]. Similar experiments but in horizontal arenas did not record such movements [64]. I. ricinus is widely distributed in Belgium with sites of apparently higher occurrence (around sites 219, 286, 288, 374, 499) (Figure 3). Lack of standardisation impedes calculation of tick densities and tick abundance and is presented here as the total number of specimens collected in a site. While abundance is expected to decrease from East to West with decreasing forest cover, this is not what comes out of the general map. Few occurrences are recorded in the Southeast despite high forest cover, but few surveys are carried out in that region, while many surveys took place in Campine to clarify tick presence. The large abundance around the Meuse area is picked up as well as decreased abundance between the Meuse and Brussels, which corresponds to a highly cultivated area (Hesbaye). Abundance is also lower along the coast, which is intensely cultivated. High abundances are recorded along the Dutch border and might reflect an increase in tick populations such as recorded in the Netherlands. These trends need, however, to be confirmed because of the lack of standardisation in sampling.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-190/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_994_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

Map of I. ricinus with abundance and hot spots. Map of existing I. ricinus records in Belgium. Abundance is based on number of ticks collected and is not standardized between sites. Collection lasted days in some sites and only a few hours in other sites, however, details on collection methods are often lacking and raw numbers of collected ticks are thus presented. Numbers labelling each site correspond to site number in Additional file 1.

Secondary vectors I. hexagonus and D. reticulatus

I. hexagonus is a confirmed vector of B. burgdorferi s.l.[65] with 28% prevalence recorded [66]. It is a nidiculous species found in burrows and occasionally in caves [44]. This reduces human vector contact but several characteristics must be highlighted: 1) human infestations were frequent during the war when people sheltered in underground sites during air raids [45] and I. hexagonus is considered a common parasite of man in Germany and the United Kingdom [43], 2) the species has a wide range of hosts such as hedgehogs, mustelids, foxes, polecat, badger, roe deer [30], as well as dogs and cats which can increase the spread of ticks and import ticks in gardens close to humans, 3) I. hexagonus is found in urban gardens [33], 4) most hedgehogs are infested [67] and the presence of ticks in their surface nests is a potential threat when gardening [33], 5) This species brings pathogens to people normally not at risk for tick bites (just gardening) and can remain undetected for a longer time, 6) it is active throughout the year [68], 7) because of B. burgdorferi s.l. transovarial transmission [65], this species could maintain a silent high rate of infection creating long term foci of high infection in the wildlife in areas where it acts as reservoir, 8) finally, Lyme borreliosis could be picked up by I. ricinus sharing the same host. In Belgium, I. hexagonus is widespread on cats and dogs [13] and has been observed on many mammals (Table 3), on humans [27], in nests, burrows, caves (sites 594, 617), house (site 200) and on grass (sites 492, 670). Populations might fluctuate between years [27]. The species in Belgium carries all the pathogenic species of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum as well as the suspected pathogen R. helvetica[13].

D. reticulatus might be restricted to limited areas and not actively questing in the warm months when people are entering risky areas. D. reticulatus is reported on wild boar, cervids, dogs, horses and cats in the French Ardennes [37], wolves or rarely birds [27, 32, 43]. It can bite humans [69]. Adults are captured by flagging but immatures are nidiculous. This species seems to be expanding its distribution in Europe. In Belgium, the tick has probably been present for some time with one specimen recorded on vegetation in 1950 (site 553), on a dog (site 567) and a human in the eighties (site 376). Established populations have only recently been monitored. Between 2007 and 2009, 16 out of 2297 ticks taken from 161 wild cervids [23] (WILDSCREEN collection) were D. reticulatus. From 2010 until March 2012, 150 additional D. reticulatus were discovered on 3 cervids in 6 sites including one confirmed by flagging (site 797). Confirmation of the species at a molecular level was carried out when sequences of the 646 bp of a part of the ITS2 gene were successfully obtained for 16 D. reticulatus. These 6 sites are in the Southeast but this tick is found on vegetation in the North (60, 130, 172, 535) [34] and on hosts in other locations [13].

Ticks parasite of birds

Birds probably carry ticks to most geographical locations but this does not mean that ticks will survive in these locations. The presence of all pathogenic species of B. burgdorferi s.l. in I. frontalis and I. arboricola in Belgium suggests a potential role in the Borrelia life cycle [7]. Up to 50% of I. frontalis[69] and also I. lividus[70] were infected with B. burgdorferi s.l. in other countries. While seldom reported as biting humans, they might maintain the pathogen cycle in wildlife. I. frontalis (previously I. pari) is associated with a broad range of songbirds, including thrushes (Turdidae), the Great tit and the collared dove [7, 28, 43], with up to 30 specimens per bird [71]. I. frontalis is occasionally collected by flagging [72] and evidence suggests that it might be more often present in under-storey vegetation than in nests [7]. In Belgium it has been found on birds in 11 sites. I. arboricola is found mainly in Europe but was recorded in Egypt on birds coming back to Europe [27]. It is a nidicolous tick infesting birds and bats [73]. The Great tit might be the dominant host but heavy infestations occur on the Common starling and Peregrine falcon [32]. In Belgium it was recorded in 10 places including 3 sites with 70 specimens (sites 233, 252, 337) where the species was actively surveyed. Specimens were found on birds (Table 3) and in nests of the House martin. I. lividus is found on the Sand martin and in their nests [27]. Experimental records showed that these ticks were collected on the Great tit [74] and it was found repeatedly in nests of the House martin in Japan [75].

Ticks parasite of rodents and small mammals

Small mammals and particularly rodents are reservoirs of many diseases, but few studies have targeted ticks on rodents in Belgium. Next to I. ricinus and I. hexagonus, ticks present on rodents and small mammals include I. canisuga, I. trianguliceps and I. acuminatus. These species are carriers of some pathogens (Table 5) including B. burgdorferi s.l.[7678] with 30% prevalence for I. canisuga in Spain [66]. I. canisuga is part of a group of species difficult to discriminate morphologically (including I. hexagonus, I. arboricola and I. lividus) [27]. I. canisuga is widely distributed and found on half of the foxes in Northern France [30] but also on polecats, weasels, badgers, Eurasian owls, dogs and cats [79, 80] with up to 200 specimens reported on one dog [81]. In Great Britain, 11% of the ticks found on dogs were I. canisuga[80] but none were reported in a Belgian survey [13]. This nidiculous species is found in nests, burrows or rarely in caves [44] with fed females climbing upwards in crevices above ground [28]. In Belgium, only two specimens were found, on a polecat (site 132) and a nest (site 207). I. trianguliceps is found almost exclusively on micromammals including shrews and rodents, exceptionally on moles, birds or goats and very rarely on humans [27, 55]. The tick is nidiculous but may wait for hosts on the soil surface [82]. It is commonly found in wet biotopes including moorlands, meadows, or pine, deciduous and birch forests [83]. In France, immature are found with immature of D. reticulatus, I. acuminatus, and I. ricinus on the same rodents [84, 85]. In Belgium, I. trianguliceps is probably frequent and found on rodents in 8 sites. I. acuminatus parasitizes small mammals, birds and sometimes humans and is mostly found in nests and burrows [28]. Only one specimen was found in Belgium on a wood mouse (site 630).

Other tick species sharing habitats with humans

Three tick species are not frequent but bite humans and can establish populations inside houses, making them a potential threat. Rhipicephalus sanguineus is a tropical tick imported on dogs or rarely with hares, cattles, horses, or plants [55]. The tick cannot survive outside but multiplies inside houses and dog kennels [27]. Ticks hunt for hosts by moving actively [86], can drink free water and survive for years inside. This was shown to cause house infestations in 12 cities in the Netherlands, in Switzerland [87] and 334 foci in Berlin [88]. Tick populations can build up in some years from one engorged female to thousands of ticks and eggs [87, 89, 90]. Eggs are hidden in cracks and crevices and ticks crawl around. Mean temperature probably limits its northward distribution [91]. This species is rarely found on humans [27], but seems to more willingly bite humans occasionally, representing at times up to 7% of ticks biting men [92]. Up to 22 ticks on one man were reported in France [93]. Some studies suggest that this highlights a change of behaviour related to temperature increase [94, 95] but this needs to be further investigated. R. sanguineus is a vector of highly pathogenic Rickettsiae conorii with confirmed transovarial passage [96]. Prevalence in nymphs infesting houses can reach up to 40% [87], against usually 1% [94] outside. In Belgium, R. sanguineus was found in houses in Antwerp [27] (site 210), Hoboken (site 199) [90] and Maldegem (site 71), but also on dogs with a travel history (e.g. sites 338, 426, 536, 684) [13] and on humans (site 210) [27].

Argas reflexus is frequent mainly on pigeons but readily bites humans, chickens or horses in buildings in the absence of pigeons [43, 55]. With Argas vespertilionis (see below) this species belongs to the Argasidae family, which differs from Ixodidae in their feeding habits. Ticks take many short meals. Nymphs and adults engorge in less than an hour. Ticks feed on eight to twelve hosts per life cycle and spend most of their life in the hosts’ habitat [97]. Building infestations are undetected for years because of nocturnal host-seeking behaviour, high host specificity and short meals [98]. However, when pigeons are eradicated, A. reflexus appear seeking for alternative hosts [97]. Even if the build-up of a large number of ticks takes years, thousands of ticks were found repeatedly when investigating 188 infested buildings in Germany [98]. Searching for ticks before renovating is now a current recommendation in Germany. Particularities include a long lifetime of up to 9 years without food, low water loss rate, absorption of water vapour at 75% relative humidity and high tolerance of temperature extremes. Movements are restricted to periods of host-seeking, the remaining time being spent resting aggregated in cracks of walls [9799]. In Belgium ticks were recorded in 7 sites from pigeons, pigeon houses, houses and flats. The bites may cause allergy, anaphylactic shock or loss of consciousness [100]. It is an unconfirmed vector of human pathogens.

Argas vespertilionis parasitizes bats [43]. They stay the whole year in or near caves or other shelters (roofs of houses), the hosts being present or not. Eggs were found together with eggs of I. hexagonus and I. vespertilionis[43, 44]. Ticks bite alternative hosts in the absence of their usual host and readily bite man. People reported being bitten in caves or in their bed when bats are in the attics [55]. Larvae attach for 19 days. Nymphs and adults feed in less than one hour [97]. They take many small meals on many hosts potentially accumulating pathogens. A. vespertilionis causes irritating bites on humans and viable strains of C. burnetii were isolated from ticks which had been dead for a year [97]. While 84% of museum specimens tested positive for B. burgdorferi s.l. in the UK [78], this might reflect sample contamination. Borrelia sp. organisms related to Borrelia recurrentis, B. duttonii and B. crocidurae were present in numbers in a dying bat in the UK [101] parasitized by A. vespertilionis. In Belgium, 11 ticks were found on hosts in four locations.

Species of little interest for human health

Ixodes vespertilionis was never recorded biting man. It parasites the Lesser horseshoe and the Great bats. It actively searches for hosts by walking slowly on very long legs in caves. It is restricted to the darkest part of the caves, offering 100% humidity [28, 102]. Decrease of humidity to 61% increases tick activity until they die after a few hours. All stages are mainly found in caves, moving away with the host but coming back for molting and egg laying [102]. Specimens are not on the ground but on walls and roof crevices. In West France low densities are present in most caves. Ticks were found in caves or on bats in 10 sites in East Belgium [27].

Conclusion

By providing a countrywide disaggregated approach on tick-borne diseases, this study provides essential preliminary information to build up a national public health policy based on spatial surveillance of tick-borne diseases [103] and help to delineate priorities for future investigations. These are summarised in Table 6. (1) Regarding tick presence, this study highlights the lack of information about current species, and the need to search for species present in bordering regions. (2) In terms of tick distribution, occurrence data offers a useful picture, and this, particularly if the lack of detailed distribution of major determinants (hosts, predators) impeded building of adequate distribution models. However, modelling tick distribution could provide information in places not surveyed, clarify ecology and attach local probabilities to tick presence [104]. For modelling exophilic tick distribution (I. ricinus and D. reticulatus), examples in the field of malaria vectors show that occurrences can prove useful to delineate species distribution [105]. However, models perform better when explanatory variables englobe most ecologically relevant parameters [106]. Because of their influence on ticks and on the pathogens presence and abundance, distribution of relevant host species or valuable proxies [3] should be integrated in the models with major habitat characteristics. Distribution of nidiculous species could be approached by mapping their specific hosts. (3) Because of the above, the potential roles (hosts, pathogen reservoir versus accidental host [107], influencing tick abundance, influencing pathogen prevalence, and predators) of the birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibian or other local species should be assessed and their distribution investigated. (4) With regards to pathogens, their presence needs to be clarified. The list of micro-organisms/tick associations provided here needs to be narrowed by investigating pathogenicity, identifying reservoirs (ticks and other species), selecting pathogens for which reservoirs are present, and identifying vector capacity for associated ticks. (5) With regards to pathogen distribution, pathogens should be monitored in ticks, reservoirs or any hosts to provide a spatial distribution per pathogen. (6) Human vector contact could be approached using public knowledge from groups at risk, such as nature lovers, hunters, foresters, veterinarians, health practitioners or even the general public. Such facilities for recording tick bites were developed successfully in the Netherlands [9]. (7) Finally a risk map should provide the following locally: integration of the above distribution maps to determine the probability of being bitten by a tick, to obtain an infected tick bite per pathogen, and a list of potential pathogens locally. In this context, potential hotspots could be identified as well as places needing further investigation. This would provide a spatial disaggregation of risk and prepare analysis of seasonal or yearly variations.
Table 6

Main findings and suggestions for further research priorities

 

Current knowledge

Suggestions for future research priorities

Tick presence

• The current national list of occurring tick species (not previously available)

• Search for tick species recorded in neighbouring countries country (targeting prefered host species or habitat)

Tick distribution

• A first distribution map for Ixodes ricinus based on occurrences which highlights presence of the species in all the provinces

• Build up a distribution model for exophilic species such as Ixodes ricinus and Dermacentor reticulatus based on habitat preferences and distribution of other influencing species

• Current very partial knowledge of distribution for the other tick species

• Build up a distribution model for nidiculous species based on distribution of major host species

 

• Perform a systematic tick survey across the country

Tick hosts/ reservoirs

• Provide for each tick a list of hosts on which they have been recorded in the country

• For each local vertebrate species check potential host status for each tick species or potential influence on tick population

 

• Map the distribution of relevant species

Presence of pathogens

• Potential presence of pathogens such as Borrelia burgdoferi s.l. in many tick species

• Check the pathogenicity of each micro-organisms species

• List of microorganisms potentially present locally or aborad in local ticks species

• For pathogenic microorganisms check vector status of associated ticks Identify presence of potential reservoirs for pathogens (tick/ hosts)

• List of tick/ micro-organisms associations

• Investigate pathogen distribution across species to better comprehend

 

• risk before modelling risk map

Pathogen distribution

• First map of (suspected) pathogens found in ticks

• Search for additional pathogens in ticks of the country

 

• Make a pathogen distribution map (found in ticks, hosts, reservoirs)

Human-vector contact

 

• Use public knowledge from nature defense group, scouts, veterinary, general practitioner to localise and quantify tick bites

Tick-borne diseases risk map

• Some hot spot with highest I. ricinus abundance are highlighted but because of unreliable sampling those should be further investigated

• Investigate presence and prevalence of pathogenic species

 

• Make a countrywide standardised survey to allow comparing abundance between sites.

 

• In a given area, what is the probability 1) to get a tick bite, 2) that this tick was infected with pathogens 3) infected by which pathogen(s)

I. ricinus is the main vector of diseases in Belgium because it is present in most vegetated areas, carries many pathogens and is responsible for most tick bites in humans. Its distribution highlights the possibility of becoming infected by the pathogenic agent of Lyme borreliosis in any province. Other species might play a role by maintaining pathogens present in wildlife, or by bringing pathogens closer to people in their houses and gardens. While the number of bites on humans caused by other species is less than by I. ricinus, occurrence of such an event in unexpected areas such as houses or gardens or during the winter season extends the risk to people not considered to be at risk and increases the probability of a tick bite being ignored. Some places seem to pose a greater risk with more abundant tick populations, higher diversity of pathogens or both, but this should be confirmed. Current prevention measures target B. burgdorferi s.l. mainly through deticking. Other pathogens are increasingly investigated and found in domestic animals, wildlife or humans and transmission of some of those can occur at the time of the tick bite without delay (e.g. TBEV). Avoidance behaviour should be promoted such as avoiding areas with ferns [108], wearing boots and long trousers or repellent, using deticking as the second line measure. Another reason to avoid ticks is that in Belgium only 30% of Lyme patients remember a bite and 35% never develop Erythema migrans[109]. Lyme disease can be difficult to diagnose in the absence of Erythema migrans and particularly if additional symptoms are caused by co-occurring pathogens.

The analysis of the presence of pathogens in ticks might be easier than in human blood as organisms are more easily detected by PCR in ticks than in blood. Systematic surveys using ticks as sentinels could assess the prevalence of the pathogens in wildlife. Geolocation of tick and pathogen records allows integration into a more general databases such as those developed in the framework of The Vbornet [5] or the TICK MAP initiative [110] and could help fulfil the empty maps for tick and tick-borne disease occurrence in Belgium [4, 6]. This study based on imperfect sampling data calls for an increased surveillance of ticks and tick-borne species at a detailed spatial scale as well as clarification of local vector status for tick species and pathogens which occur in these species. A systematic survey of ticks and associated pathogens is called for in Europe, as well as better characterisation of species interaction in the ecology of tick-borne diseases.

Abbreviations

ARSIA: 

Association Régionale de Santé et d’Identification Animale

BLAST: 

Basic Local Alignment Search Tool

CCHFV: 

Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever virus

DGZ: 

Dierengezonheidzorg Animal Health Care Flanders Belgium

DNA: 

deoxyribonucleic acid

dNTP: 

deoxy ribonucleotide triphosphate

IK: 

Issuk Kul virus

IRSIA: 

Institut pour l′encouragement de la recherche dans l′industrie et l′agriculture

IRSNB: 

Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique

ITS2: 

second Internal Transcribed Spacer 2

LIV: 

Looping Ill virus

OHFV: 

Omsk Hemorragic fever virus

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

RLVBD: 

Reference Laboratory for Vector Borne Disease

SOK: 

Sokuluk virus

TBEV: 

Tick-borne Encephalitis virus

UA: 

University of Antwerp collection

UGENT FOREST: 

Ghent University, Forestry department collection

UGENT VETE: 

Ghent University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

UCLIREC: 

Université Catholique de Louvain Clinical and experimental research institute

WILDSCREEN: 

Network for disease surveillance in wildlife

WNV: 

West Nyle virus.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to Adrien Nahayo and other collaborators of the WILDSCREEN network for monitoring of diseases in wildlife and for their time and effort in collecting ticks. The authors would also like to thank Philippe Martin from the Saint-Luc hospital in Bouge Belgium, Thomas Kesteman from the UCL IREC Institute, the staff of the Royal Institute for Natural Sciences of Belgium (IRSNB) including Georges Wauthy and Léon Baert, the staff of GlaxoSmithKline including Yves Lobet and Pierre Voet for providing fresh records or additional details on their published records. The authors are grateful to the nature organisation NATAGORA and NATUURPUNT and particularly Wouter Vanreusel, Marc Herremans, Karin Gielen, Jean-Yves Paquet and Antoine Derouaux for providing details and numerous records of tick location. Thanks to Sophie Vanwambeke, Eva De Clercq, Sen li and Nienke Harteminck for support and raw literature. Thanks to BAYER for accepting to share their records for our research. Many thanks to the Belgian Sciences Policy Office for funding this work through the STEREO II project for Earth Observation (MULTITICK project).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Université Catholique de Louvain, Earth and Life Institute, Georges Lemaitre climate and earth research centre
(2)
Biodiversity department ELIB, Université Catholique de Louvain, Earth and Life Institute
(3)
Department of infectious and parasitic diseases, health and pathology of the wildlife, University of Liège
(4)
Laboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University
(5)
Reference Laboratory for Vector-Borne Diseases, Queen Astrid Military Hospital
(6)
Evolutionary ecology group, Department of Biology, University of Antwerp
(7)
Institute for Tropical Medicine
(8)
Department of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria
(9)
ARSIA, Allée des Artisans
(10)
Dierenarts Gezondheidszorg Herkauwers Veepeiler, DGZ Vlaanderen
(11)
Laboratory of Forestry, Department of Forest and Water Management, Ghent University
(12)
Laboratory of Parasitology and Pathology of Parasitic Diseases, Department of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège

References

  1. Heyman P, Cochez C, Hofhuis A, Van der Giessen J, Sprong H, Porter SR, Losson B, Saegerman C, Donoso-Mantke O, Niedrig M, Papa A: A clear and present danger: tick-borne diseases in Europe. Expert Rev of Anti-Infe. 2010, 8: 33-50. 10.1586/eri.09.118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hofhuis A, Harms M, Van der Giessen G, Sprong H, Notermans D, Van Pelt W: Ziekte van Lyme in Nederland 1994–2009: Aantal huisartsconsulten blijft toenemen. Is voorlichting en curatief beleid genoeg?. Infectieziekten Bull. 2010, 21: 84-87.Google Scholar
  3. Sprong H, Hofhuis A, Gassner F, Takken W, Jacobs F, van Vliet AJH, van Ballegooijen M, van der Giessen J, Takumi K: Circumstantial evidence for an increase in the total number and activity of Borrelia-infected Ixodes ricinus in the Netherlands. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 294-10.1186/1756-3305-5-294.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Estrada-Peña A, Farkas R, Jaenson TGT, Koenen F, Madder M, Pascucci I, Salman M, Tarrés-Call J, Jongejan F: Association of environmental traits with the geographic ranges of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) of medical and veterinary importance in the western Palearctic. A digital data set. Experiment Appl Acarol. 2013, 59 (3): 351-366. 10.1007/s10493-012-9600-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. VBORNET European network for arthropod vector surveillance for human public health. [http://www.vbornet.eu/]
  6. EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Scientific opinion on geographic distribution of tick-borne infections and their vectors in Europe and the other regions of the Mediterranean basin. EFSA J. 2010, 8 (9): 1723-Google Scholar
  7. Heylen D, Tijsse E, Fonville M, Matthysen E, Sprong H: Transmission dynamics of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in a bird tick community. Environ Microbiol. 2013, 15 (2): 663-673. 10.1111/1462-2920.12059.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wielinga PR, Gaasenbeek C, Fonville M, de Boer A, de Vries A, Dimmers W, Akkerhuis Op Jager G, Schouls LM, Borgsteede F, van der Giessen JWB: Longitudinal analysis of tick densities and borrelia, anaplasma, and ehrlichia infections of ixodes ricinus ticks in different habitat areas in the Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72 (12): 7594-7601. 10.1128/AEM.01851-06.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tekenradar.nl. 2013, The Netherlands: Publisher Wageningen University, RIVM en De Natuurkalender, [http://www.tekenradar.nl/]
  10. Ducoffre G: Surveillance des maladies infectieuses par un réseau de laboratoires de microbiologie 2009. Tendances epidémiologiques 1983–2008. 2009, Belgian Institute for Public Health (ISP-WIV): Belgium, [http://www.iph.fgov.be/epidemio/epifr/plabfr/plabanfr/index09.htm. Rapport 2009]Google Scholar
  11. Vanthomme K, Bossuyt N, Boffin N, Van Casteren V: Incidence and management of presumption of Lyme borreliosis in Belgium: recent data from the sentinel network of general practitioners. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012, 31: 2385-2390. 10.1007/s10096-012-1580-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stanek G, Fingerle V, Hunfeld K-P, Jaulhac B, Kaiser R, Krause A, Kristoferitsch W, O'Connell S, Ornstein K, Strle F, Gray J: Lyme borreliosis: clinical case definitions for diagnosis and management in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011, 17: 69-79. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03175.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Claerebout E, Losson B, Cochez C, Casaert S, Dalemans AC, De Cat A, Madder M, Saegerman C, Heyman P, Lempereur L: Ticks and associated pathogens collected from dogs and cats in Belgium. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 183-10.1186/1756-3305-6-183.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li S, Heyman P, Cochez C, Simons L, Vanwambeke SO: A multi-level analysis of the relationship between environmental factors and questing Ixodes ricinus dynamics in Belgium. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 149-10.1186/1756-3305-5-149.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tack W, Madder M, Baeten L, Vanhellemont M, Gruwez R, Verheyen K: Local habitat and landscape affect Ixodes ricinus tick abundances in forests on poor, sandy soils. Forest Ecol Manag. 2012, 265: 30-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Tack W, Madder M, De Frenne P, Vanhellemont M, Gruwez R, Verheyen K: The effects of sampling method and vegetation type on the estimated abundance of Ixodes ricinus ticks in forests. Exp Appl Acarol. 2011, 54: 285-292. 10.1007/s10493-011-9444-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lempereur L, Lebrun M, Cuvelier P, Sépult G, Caron Y, Saegerman C, Shiels B, Losson B: Longitudinal field study on bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infections during a grazing season in Belgium. Parasitol Res. 2012, 110: 1525-1530. 10.1007/s00436-011-2657-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kesteman T, Rossi C, Bastien P, Brouillard J, Avesani V, Olive N, Martin P, Delmée M: Prevalence and genetic heterogeneity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ticks in Belgium. Acta Clin Belg. 2010, 65: 319-322.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Heylen DJA, Madder M, Matthysen E: Lack of resistance against the tick Ixodes ricinus in two related passerine bird species. Int J Parasitol. 2010, 40: 183-191. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2009.07.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Heylen DJA, Matthysen E: Contrasting detachment strategies in two congeneric ticks (Ixodidae) parasitizing the same songbird. Parasitology. 2010, 137: 661-667. 10.1017/S0031182009991582.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Heylen DJA, Matthysen E: Differential virulence in two congeneric ticks infesting songbird nestlings. Parasitology. 2011, 138: 1011-1021. 10.1017/S0031182011000618.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Heylen DJA, Matthysen E: Experimental evidence for host preference in a tick parasitizing songbird nestlings. Oikos. 2011, 120: 1209-1216. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.19358.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Linden A, Wirtgen M, Volpe S, Nahayo A, Pirson J, Paternostre J, Grégoire F: Surveillance of wildlife diseases in Belgium. Rev Épid San Anim. 2011, 59–60: 213-215.Google Scholar
  24. Zahler M, Gothe R, Rinder H: Genetic evidence against a morphologically suggestive conspecificity of Dermacentor reticulatus and D. Marginatus (acari: ixodidae). Int J Parasitol. 1995, 25: 1413-1419. 10.1016/0020-7519(95)00081-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Dobec M, Golubic D, Punda-Polic V, Kaeppeli F, Sievers M: Rickettsia Helvetica in dermacentor reticulatus ticks. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 98-100. 10.3201/eid1501.080815.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Bigaignon G, Martin P, Tomasi JP, Gonzalez M, Lozes E, Gillion P, Fain A: La maladie de Lyme en belgique:présence du spirochète borrelia burgdorferi dans les tiques ixodes ricinus récoltées dans la région mosane. Rev Med Liege. 1989, 44 (15–16): 489-493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Fain A: Les tiques de belgique: acari, ixodoidea. 1990, Belgium: Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Hillyard PD: Ticks of north-west Europe: keys and notes for identification of the species. 1996, London: Linnean Society of London and the Estuarine and Coastal Sciences Association, Field Studies CouncilGoogle Scholar
  29. Rageau J: Répartition géographique et rôle pathogène des tiques (acariens: Argasidae et Ixodidae) en France. Wladomosci Parazytologiczne. 1972, 43 (4-6): 707-719.Google Scholar
  30. Aubert M: Contribution à l′étude du parasitisme du renard (Vulpes vulpes L.) par les Ixodidae (Acarina) dans le nord-est de la France. Acarologia. 1975, 17 (3): 452-479.Google Scholar
  31. Bronswijk JEMH, Garben AFM, Rijntjes RH: De teken ixodida van de benelux-landen. 1979, The Netherlands: Wetenschappelijke mededelingen van de Koninklijke Nederlandse Natuurhistorische VerenigingGoogle Scholar
  32. Petney T, Pfaffle M, Skuballa J: An annoted checklist of the ticks (Acari:Ixodida) of Germany. Syst Appl Acarol. 2012, 17: 115-170.Google Scholar
  33. Gern L, Rouvinez E, Toutoungi LN, Godfroid E: Transmission cycles of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato involving Ixodes ricinus and/or I. hexagonus ticks and the European hedgehog, Erinaceus europaeus, in suburban and urban areas in Switzerland. Folia Parasitol. 1997, 44: 309-314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cochez C, Lempereur L, Madder M, Claerebout E, Simons L, DE Wilde N, Linden A, Saegerman C, Heyman P, Losson B: Foci report on indigenous Dermacentor reticulatus populations in Belgium and a preliminary study of associated babesiosis pathogens. Med Vet Entomol. 2012, 26: 355-358. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00998.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Aeschlimann A: Ixodes ricinus, Linnée, 1758 Ixodoidea; Ixodidae: Essai préliminaire de synthèse sur la biologie de cette espèce en Suisse. 1972, Switzerland: Verlag für Recht und GesellschaftGoogle Scholar
  36. Schöffel I, Schein E, Wittstadt U, Hentsche J: [Parasite fauna of red foxes in Berlin (West)]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1991, 104: 153-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Panas E, Léger N, Kretz JL, Dumesnil C: [Ixodidae of the champagne-Ardennes region. Preliminary study]. Acarologia. 1976, 28: 51-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Liebisch A, Rahman MS: [Prevalence of the ticks dermacentor marginatus (sulzer, 1776) and dermacentor reticulatus (Fabricius, 1794) and their importance as vectors of diseases in Germany (author’s transl)]. Tropenmed Parasitol. 1976, 27: 393-404.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hornok S, Farkas R: Influence of biotope on the distribution and peak activity of questing ixodid ticks in Hungary. Med Vet Entomol. 2009, 23: 41-46. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2008.00768.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Acunman K: Zecken and flussnahen biotopen in Baden-Wurttemberg. 2010, Karlsruhe Institue of Technology: Bsc ThesisGoogle Scholar
  41. Barker S, Murrell A: Systematics and evolution of ticks with a list of valid genus and species names. Ticks biology, diseases and control. Edited by: Bowman A, Nuttall P. 2008, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Dobson ADM, Taylor JL, Randolph SE: Tick (Ixodes ricinus) abundance and seasonality at recreational sites in the UK: hazards in relation to fine-scale habitat types revealed by complementary sampling methods. Ticks Tick Born Dis. 2011, 2: 67-74. 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2011.03.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Arthur DR: British ticks. 1963, London: ButterworthGoogle Scholar
  44. Beaucournu J, Matile L: Contribution à l′inventaire faunistique des cavités souterraines de l′Ouest de la France.3. Liste des espèces, bibliographie. Ann Speleol. 1963, 18: 519-531.Google Scholar
  45. Bown KJ, Lambin X, Telford GR, Ogden NH, Telfer S, Woldehiwet Z, Birtles RJ: Relative importance of Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes trianguliceps as vectors for Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti in field vole (Microtus agrestis) populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 7118-7125. 10.1128/AEM.00625-08.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mans B, Gothe R, Neitz A: Tick toxins: perspectives on paralysis and other forms of toxicoses caused by ticks. Ticks: biology, diseases and control. Edited by: Bowman A, Nuttall P. 2008, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108-126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Eskow E, Adelson ME, Rao RVS, Mordechai E: Evidence for disseminated Mycoplasma fermentans in New jersey residents with antecedent tick attachment and subsequent musculoskeletal symptoms. J Clin Rheumatol. 2003, 9: 77-87. 10.1097/01.RHU.0000062510.04724.07.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Polkowska A, Harjunpaa A, Toikkanen S, Lappalainen M, Vuento R, Vuorinen T, Kauppinen J, Flinck H, Lyytikainen O: Increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in Finland, 2010–2011. Euro Surveill. 2012, 17: 1-4.Google Scholar
  49. Eibach D, Casalegno J, Escuret V, Billaud G, Mekki Y, Frobert E, Bouscambert-Duchamp M, Lina B, Morfin F: Increased detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in children, Lyon, France, 2010 to 2011. Euro Surveill. 2012, 17: 1-3.Google Scholar
  50. Bonnet S, Jouglin M, Malandrin L, Becker C, Agoulon A, L'hostis M, Chauvin A: Transstadial and transovarial persistence of Babesia divergens DNA in Ixodes ricinus ticks fed on infected blood in a new skin-feeding technique. Parasitology. 2007, 134 (2): 197-207. 10.1017/S0031182006001545.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Bonnet S, Brisseau N, Hermouet A, Jouglin M, Chauvin A: Experimental in vitro transmission of Babesia sp. (EU1) by Ixodes ricinus. Vet Res. 2009, 40: 21-10.1051/vetres/2009004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Gray J, von Stedingk LV, Gürtelschmid M, Granström M: Transmission studies of babesia microti in ixodes ricinus ticks and gerbils. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40 (4): 1259-10.1128/JCM.40.4.1259-1263.2002.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Famerée L, Cotteleer C, Antoine H: La babésiose bovine en Belgique, une anthropozoonose envahissante et méconnue. Incidence des babésioses animales sur la santé humaine. Rev Med Liege. 1977, 32: 383-390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Losson B, Mollet J, Avez F, Malaise F, Mignon B: Description de trois cas autochtones de babesiose canine (Babesia canis) en Belgique. Ann Med Vet. 1999, 143: 119-124.Google Scholar
  55. Jaenson T, Talleklint L, Lundqvist L, Olsen B, Chirico J, Mejlon H: Geographical distribution, host associations, and vector roles of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae, Argasidae) in Sweden. J Med Entomol. 1994, 31: 240-256.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Estrada-Peña A, Martinez JM, Sanchez Acedo C, Quilez J, Del Cacho E: Phenology of the tick, Ixodes ricinus, in its southern distribution range (central Spain). Med Vet Entomol. 2004, 18: 387-397. 10.1111/j.0269-283X.2004.00523.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Mehl R: The distribution and host relations of Norwegian ticks (Acari, Ixodides). Fauna Norvegica Serie B. Norw Journal Entomol. 1983, 30: 46-51.Google Scholar
  58. Sevcik M, Kristofik J, Uhrin M, Benda P: New records of ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) parasiting on bats in Slovakia. Vespertilio. 2010, 13–14: 139-147.Google Scholar
  59. Fain A, Vangeluwe D, Degreef M, Wauthy G: Observations on mites inhabiting nests of Bubo bubo (L.) (Strigigformes, Strigidae) in Belgium. Bel J Zool. 1993, 123 (1): 3-26.Google Scholar
  60. Kurtenbach K, Peacey M, Rijpkema SGT, Hoodless AN, Nuttall PA, Randolph SE: Differential transmission of the genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by game birds and small rodents in England. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 1169-1174.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Marsot M, Henry P-Y, Vourc’h G, Gasqui P, Ferquel E, Laignel J, Grysan M, Chapuis J-L: Which forest bird species are the main hosts of the tick, Ixodes ricinus, the vector of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, during the breeding season?. Int J Parasitol. 2012, 42: 781-788. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.05.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Herrmann C, Voordouw MJ, Gern L: Ixodes ricinus infected with the causative agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, have higher energy reserves. Int J Parasitol. 2013, 43 (6): 477-483. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2012.12.010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Perret J-L, Guerin PM, Diehl PA, Vlimant M, Gern L: Darkness induces mobility, and saturation deficit limits questing duration, in the tick Ixodes ricinus. J Exp Biol. 2003, 206: 1809-1815. 10.1242/jeb.00345.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Crooks E, Randolph SE: Walking by Ixodes ricinus ticks: Intrinsic and extrinsic factors determine the attraction of moisture or host odour. J Experiment Biol. 2006, 209 (11): 2138-2142. 10.1242/jeb.02238.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Gern L, Toutoungi LN, Hu CM, Aeschlimann A: Ixodes (Pholeoixodes) hexagonus, an efficient vector of Borrelia burgdorferi in the laboratory. Med Vet Entomol. 1991, 5: 431-435. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1991.tb00571.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Estrada-Peña A, Oteo JA, Estrada-Peña R, Gortázar C, Osácar JJ, Moreno JA, Castellá J: Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) from two different foci in Spain. Exp Appl Acarol. 1995, 19: 173-180. 10.1007/BF00046289.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Matuschka FR, Richter D, Fischer P, Spielman A: Nocturnal detachment of the tick Ixodes hexagonus from nocturnally active hosts. Med Vet Entomol. 1990, 4: 415-420. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00459.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Pfäffle M, Petney T, Skuballa J, Taraschewski H: Comparative population dynamics of a generalist (Ixodes ricinus) and specialist tick (I. hexagonus) species from European hedgehogs. Exp Appl Acarol. 2011, 54: 151-164. 10.1007/s10493-011-9432-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Estrada-Peña A, Jongejan F: Ticks feeding on humans: a review of records on human-biting Ixodoidea with special reference to pathogen transmission. Exp Appl Acarol. 1999, 23: 685-715. 10.1023/A:1006241108739.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Movila A, Gatewood A, Toderas I, Duca M, Papero M, Uspenskaia I, Conovalov J, Fish D: Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus and I. lividus ticks collected from wild birds in the Republic of Moldova. Int J Med Microbiol. 2008, 298 (Suppl 1): 149-153.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Monks D, Fisher M, Forbes NA: Ixodes frontalis and avian tick-related syndrome in the United Kingdom. J Small Anim Pract. 2006, 47: 451-455. 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00031.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Gilot B, Beaucournu JC, Chastel C: Collecte «au drapeau» et fixation sur l′homme d’Ixodes (Trichotoixodes) frontalis (Panzer, 1795). Parasite. 1997, 4 (2): 197-199.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Špitalska E, Literak I, Kocianova E, Taragelova V: The importance of ixodes arboricola in transmission of rickettsia spp., anaplasma phagocytophilum, and borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in the Czech republic, central Europe. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11: 1235-1241. 10.1089/vbz.2010.0210.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Ulmanen I, Saikku P, Vikberg P, Sorjonen J: Ixodes lividus (acari) in sand martin colonies in fennoscandia. Oikos. 1977, 28: 20-10.2307/3543318.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Uchikawa K, Sato A: The occurrence of Argas japonicus and ixodes lividus in Nagano prefecture, Japan (ixodoidea: argasidae; ixodidae). J Med Entomol. 1969, 6: 95-97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Doby JM, Bigaignon G, Launay H, Costil C, Lorvellec O: Presence of borrelia burgdorferi, agent of tick spirochaetosis, in ixodes (exopalpiger) trianguliceps Birula, 1895 and ixodes (ixodes) acuminatus Neumann, 1901 (acari: ixodidae) and in ctenophthalmus baeticus arvernus Jordan, 1931 and megabothris turbidus (Rothschild, 1909) (insecta: siphonaptera), ectoparasites of small mammals in forests in western France. Bull Soc Fr Parasitol. 1990, 8: 311-322.Google Scholar
  77. Doby JM, Bigaignon G, Aubert M, Imbert G: Ectoparasites du renard et borreliose de Lyme. Recherche de borrelia burgdorferi chez les tiques ixodidae et insectes siphonaptera. Bull Soc Fr Parasitol. 1991, 9: 279-288.Google Scholar
  78. Hubbard MJ, Baker AS, Cann KJ: Distribution of borrelia burgdorferi s.l. Spirochaete DNA in British ticks (argasidae and ixodidae) since the 19th century, assessed by PCR. Med Vet Entomol. 1998, 12: 89-97. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00088.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Gilot B, Aubert M: Les Ixodidae (acarines, ixodoidea) parasites de carnivores sauvages dans les alpes françaises et leur avant-pays. Acarologia. 1985, 26: 215-233.Google Scholar
  80. Ogden NH, Cripps P, Davison CC, Owen G, Parry JM, Timms BJ, Forbes AB: The ixodid tick species attaching to domestic dogs and cats in Great Britain and Ireland. Med Vet Entomol. 2000, 14: 332-338. 10.1046/j.1365-2915.2000.00244.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Smith M: The life history of Ixodes canisuga (Johnston 1849) under laboratory conditions. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1972, 66: 281-286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Graf J, Mermod C, Aeschlimann A: Nouvelles données concernant la distribution, l′écologie et la biologie d’Ixodes (Exopalpiger) trianguliceps (Birula, 1895) en Suisse (Ixodoidea, Ixodidae). Bull Soc Neuchat Sci Nat. 1979, 102: 55-68.Google Scholar
  83. Aeschlimann A, Büttiker W, Diehl PA, Eichenberger G, Immler R, Weiss N: [Presence of Ixodes trianguliceps (Birula, 1895) and Ixodes apronophorus (Schulze, 1924) in Switzerland (Ixodoidea; Ixodidae)]. Rev Suisse Zool. 1970, 77: 527-536.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Boyard C, Vourc’h G, Barnouin J: The relationships between Ixodes ricinus and small mammal species at the woodland-pasture interface. Exp Appl Acarol. 2008, 44: 61-76. 10.1007/s10493-008-9132-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Pisanu B, Marsot M, Marmet J, Chapuis J-L, Réale D, Vourc’h G: Introduced Siberian chipmunks are more heavily infested by ixodid ticks. Int J Parasitol. 2010, 40 (11): 1277-1283. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.03.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Dantas-Torres F: Biology and ecology of the brown dog tick, rhipicephalus sanguineus. Parasit Vectors. 2010, 3: 26-10.1186/1756-3305-3-26.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Aeschlimann A, Buttiker W: Importation de tiques en Suisse (Acarina: Ixodoidea). Bull Soc Entomol Suisse. 1975, 48 (1-2): 69-75.Google Scholar
  88. Hoffmann G: Die Braune hundezecke (rhipicephalus sanguineus L.) in Berlin (west). epizootologische untersuchungen unter einschaltung von massenmedien. Bundesgesundheitsblatt. 1981, 24: 153-163.Google Scholar
  89. Péter O, Burgdorfer W, Aeschlimann A, Chatelanat P: Rickettsia conorii isolated from Rhipicephalus sanguineus introduced into Switzerland on a pet dog. Z Parasitenkd. 1984, 70: 265-270. 10.1007/BF00942229.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Sibomana G, Geerts S, De Vries T: [Establishment of Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) inside houses in Belgium]. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1986, 66: 79-81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Gray JS, Dautel H, Estrada-Peña A, Kahl O, Lindgren E: Effects of climate change on ticks and tick-borne diseases in Europe. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2009, 2009: 593232-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Campbell BS, Bowles DE: Human tick bite records in a United States air force population, 1989–1992: implications for tick-borne disease risk. J Wilderness Med. 1994, 5: 405-412. 10.1580/0953-9859-5.4.405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Hemmersbach-Miller M, Parola P, Brouqui P, Raoult D: A 51-year-old homeless man who died in Marseille, southern France. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 38: 1412-1493.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Parola P, Socolovschi C, Jeanjean L, Bitam I, Fournier P-E, Sotto A, Labauge P, Raoult D: Warmer weather linked to tick attack and emergence of severe rickettsioses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008, 2: e338-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000338.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Estrada-Peña A, Bouattour A, Camicas J-L, Walker AR: Ticks of domestic animals in the Mediterranean region: a guide to identification of species. 2004, Zaragoza: University of ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  96. Blanc J, Camino Pietros J: Epidemiological and experimental studies on Boutonneuse fever done at the Pasteur institute in Athens. Arch Inst Pasteur Tunis. 1932, 20: 343-394.Google Scholar
  97. Hoogstraal H: Argasid and Nuttalliellid ticks as parasites and vectors. Adv Parasitol. 1985, 24: 135-238.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Dautel H, Scheurer S, Kahl O: The pigeon tick (Argas reflexus): its biology, ecology, and epidemiological aspects. Zbl Bakt. 1999, 289 (5-7): 745-753.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Dautel H, Kahl O, Knülle W: The soft tick Argas reflexus (F.) (Acari, Argasidae) in urban environments and its medical significance in Berlin (West). J Appl Entomol. 1991, 111: 380-390. 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1991.tb00338.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Hilger C, Bessot J-C, Hutt N, Grigioni F, De Blay F, Pauli G, Hentges F: IgE-mediated anaphylaxis caused by bites of the pigeon tick Argas reflexus: cloning and expression of the major allergen Arg r 1. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005, 115: 617-622. 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.11.052.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  101. Evans NJ, Bown K, Timofte D, Simpson VR, Birtles RJ: Fatal Borreliosis in bat caused by relapsing fever spirochete, United Kingdom. Emerging Infect Dis. 2009, 15: 1331-1333. 10.3201/eid1508.090475.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Beaucournu J: Contribution à la connaissance de la biologie d’ Ixodes (Eschatocephalus) Vespertilionis Koch 1844 et d’Ixodes (Pomerantzevella) simplex Neumann 1906 (Acarina, Ixodoidea), parasites des chiroptères. Ann speleol. 1967, 22: 543-580.Google Scholar
  103. Obsomer V, Titeux N, Duveiller G, Vancutsem C, Pekel J-F, Ceccato P, Connor S, Coosemans M: From Anopheles to spatial surveillance: a roadmap through a multidisciplinary challenge. Anopheles mosquitoes – New insights into malaria vectors. Edited by: Manguin S. 2013, Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publisher, in pressGoogle Scholar
  104. Daniel MJ, Kola Zeman R: GIS tools for tick and tick-borne disease occurrence. Parasitology. 2004, 129: 329-352. 10.1017/S0031182004006080.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Sinka ME, Bangs MJ, Manguin S, Chareonviriyaphap T, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Gething PW, Elyazar IRF, Kabaria CW, Harbach RE, Hay SI: The dominant anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit Vectors. 2011, 4: 89-10.1186/1756-3305-4-89.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  106. Obsomer V, Defourny P, Coosemans M: Predicted Distribution of major malaria vectors belonging to the anopheles dirus complex in Asia: ecological niche and environmental influences. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (11): e50475-10.1371/journal.pone.0050475.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Charrel RN, Attoui H, Butenko AM, Clegg AMJC, Deubel V, Frolova TV, Gould EA, Gritsun TS, Heinz FX, Labuda M, Lashkevich VA, Loktev V, Lundkvist A, Lvov DV, Mandl CW, Niedrig M, Papa A, Petrov VS, Plyusnin A, Randolph S, Suss J, Zlobin VI, de Lamballerie X: Tick-borne virus diseases of human interest in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004, 10: 1040-1055. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01022.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Trotter WR: Is bracken a health hazard?. Lancet. 1990, 336: 1563-1565. 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93325-J.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  109. Bigaignon G, Tomasi JP, Goubau P, Martin P, Pierard D, Sindic CJ, Dupuis M, Marcelis L, Degreef H, Willocx D: A clinical and sero-epidemiological study of 190 Belgian patients suffering from Lyme borreliosis. Acta Clin Belg. 1989, 44: 174-181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. Walter Reed biosystematics unit TICKMAP. USA: The Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit; accessed in April 2013,http://www.tickmap.org/index.htm,

Copyright

© Obsomer et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.