Open Access

Field evaluation of alphacypermethrin in indoor residual spraying for leishmaniasis control in an endemic area, northern Morocco

  • Chafika Faraj1Email author,
  • El Bachir Adlaoui1,
  • Souad Ouahabi1,
  • Mohammed Elkohli1,
  • Mohammed Elrhazi1,
  • Lhousseine Laqraa1 and
  • Btissam Ameur2
Parasites & Vectors20136:354

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-354

Received: 9 October 2013

Accepted: 9 December 2013

Published: 13 December 2013

Abstract

Background

In Morocco, the main strategies of leishmaniasis vector control are based on environmental modifications. Use of local residual indoor spraying with synthetic pyrethroids is often envisaged. The need to evaluate this control method is essential. The current study was conducted to determine the efficacy of an alphacypermethrin IRS program against leishmaniasis vectors in an endemic area in the north of Morocco.

Methods

The survey was conducted in four neighbouring localities in three different districts in northern Morocco: Ait Chaib and Aichoun in Sefrou district, Bouassem (Boulmane) and Lmrouj (Taounate). Indoor residual spraying with alphacypermethrin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 was used in Ait Chaib and Lmrouj localities during 2010, 2011 and 2012, while localities of Aichoun and Bouassem were taken as control. In the four studied areas, sand flies were collected bimonthly from April to November in 2011 and 2012, using sticky traps, to determine their abundance and feeding pattern. Alphacypermethrin IRS were evaluated for their residual effect using the WHO cone bioassay test. Leishmaniasis incidence was estimated by passive and active case detection in each study area.

Results

Significant reductions in leishmaniasis incidence and in gravidity rate were observed when comparing sprayed and unsprayed localities. The residual activity of alphacypermethrin at the concentration used lasted 10 weeks after spraying. However, the abundance of sand flies was not significantly affected by alphacypermethrin IRS.

Conclusion

This study indicated that IRS has a significant impact on leishmaniasis transmission; therefore it could be recommended as an effective tool for leishmaniasis control in areas with high leishmaniasis transmission.

Keywords

Cutaneous lehmaniasis Control IRS Alphacypermethrin Sand flies Morocco

Background

Cutaneous Leishmaniases are endemic in Morocco with two described forms; anthroponotic and zoonotic leishmaniasis.The zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major is endemic especially in the south of the country where its vector, Phlebotomus papatasi and its reservoir host, Meriones shawi, are prevalent [1]. The anthroponotic cutaneous leishmaniasis, due to L. tropica and transmitted by Ph. sergenti[2], is endemic in the center and the north of the country [3]. These infections represent a serious health problem in Morocco and have reached epidemic levels, in recent years, in many regions [4]. In 2011, the Moroccan Ministry of Health (MMOH) reported 4319 cutaneous leishmaniasis cases caused by both L. major and L. tropica[5].

Control measures against leishmaniasis rely both on case management, rodent reservoir control in zoonotic foci, and vector control in anthroponotic foci. Vector control methods include environmental modifications, use of bednets and local residual indoor spraying with synthetic pyrethroids. However, the impact of these measures was never investigated under field conditions within the biogeographical area treated.

The aim of this study is to evaluate entomological and epidemiological impacts of a leishmaniasis control program, conducted by MMOH, using a pyrethroid in indoor residual spraying (IRS) in an endemic area in the north of Morocco.

Methods

Study area

The survey was conducted in four neighbouring localities located in three different districts in northern Morocco: Ait Chaib and Aichoun in Sefrou district, Bouassem (Boulmane) and Lmrouj (Taounate) (Figure 1). The localities were chosen because they had similar topographical and epidemiological characteristics. The region is mountainous, with altitudes ranging from 900 to 1100 m. These localities have essentially a semi arid climate. There is rain from November to April. The annual mean rainfall is about 500 mm, annual mean temperature is 16°C with a mean maxima of 25°C and a mean minima of 9.5°C. August is usually the hottest month of the year.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-354/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_1129_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Map showing the study sites.

The inhabitants of the four localities are, mainly farmers and breeders. Bovines, ovines, caprines, equines, dogs and chickens are common animals. The houses in all areas are generally built in a similar shape. Most of them are very simple and mainly made of bricks. Shelters for domestic animals are generally around the houses.

Epidemiological data

Leishmaniasis incidence was measured by passive and active case detection in each study area. In addition to passive case detection made systematically by MMOH services, campaigns for active case detection were conducted in schools to identify further cases who may not be presenting at health facilities. These campaigns were carried out during March, September and December 2010, 2011 and 2012 in each study area.

Taking into account the seasonality and the transmission period in Morocco, we used an epidemiological year (July to June) for epidemiological data.

Insecticide spraying

Indoor residual spraying with alphacypermethrin was conducted in Ait Chaib including 184 houses and Lmrouj (187 houses) while localities of Aichoun (225 houses) and Bouassem (576 houses) were taken as control.

On the basis of previous works, delimitating transmission period from May to October, IRS operations were planned for May of each year, but because of operational harms, they took place only in the end of June 2010, 2011 and 2012 in Ait chaib locality and in the beginning of July 2010, 2011 and 2012 in Lmrouj locality. Used insecticide is alphacypermethrin (10% SC) at a dose of 30 mg/m2. Each round, over 90% of households in both localities were treated. All indoor surfaces, including roof structures, animal shelters and caves near of houses were sprayed. The IRS operations were carried out by volunteer workers recruited from the local community and trained by the MMOH team. The treatment of the walls was done with a manual pressure sprayer of GLORIA type. Before treatment, workers were protected with a long sleeved overall, goggles, mask, gloves, boots and a helmet for safety.

Entomological data

The entomological evaluation was based on the follow-up of the abundance of flies and their feeding rate in the sprayed and unsprayed villages.

Insecticide effectivness was evaluated by the follow-up of the insecticidal residual effect on the treated surfaces after assessing Ph. sergenti susceptibility to pyrethroids.

Sand fly sampling

Systematic sand fly collections, using the sticky trap method, were carried out bimonthly inside animal shelters from April to November 2011 and during the same period of 2012. Five stations were chosen at random in each locality and 10 traps were placed in each station.

All sand flies were sorted and assigned to species based on morphological characters using standard identification keys [6]. The female sand flies were classified according to the state of their abdomens (unfed, fed or gravid).

Insecticide persistence

The efficacy and the residual action of the insecticide against the local sand fly vectors under field conditions were assessed using WHO recommended procedures [7]. Contact bioassy cones were set against sprayed walls in Ait chaib locality, the day after spraying then once every two weeks until the loss of efficiency (when mortality rate of sand flies exposed to sprayed walls became inferior to 70%). Bioassay was carried out with field sand flies caught in the Aichoun locality. Sand flies were exposed to alphacypermethrin treated surfaces in the transparent plastic bioassay cone for 30 min. In each assay, 12 cones were fastened on walls at 1.5 m from the ground in 4 treated households (with 3 cones per house). 4 cone chambers were used as control and processed in the same way, by exposing sand flies to untreated walls. In each cone, test batches of fifteen sand flies were introduced by an aspirator. After exposure, sand flies were removed with a bent-end aspirator, through the opening of the chamber, and immediately transferred to holding pots closed with a fine mesh and provided with glucose solution for nourishment. They were kept at 20–25°C to score the mortality rates after 24 hours.

Sand fly susceptibility to pyrethroids

Resistance to pyrethroids was assessed on sand fly populations from Aichoun locality (control locality) by using standard WHO testing procedures [8].

Sand flies were collected using CDC Light Traps in animal’s shelters on June 2012. As we did not have alphacypermethrin impregnated papers available, four lots of about 20 sand flies were exposed to another pyrethroid (lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%). A control test was performed, simultaneously, using control papers. Knockdown rates were noted at 5 min intervals during the insecticide exposure. After one hour of exposure, sand flies were transferred to the observation tube and kept in appropriate conditions (25 ± 2°C and 80% ± 10% relative humidity) for 24 hours. Sufficient relative humidity was ensured by putting small pieces of cotton wool impregnated with distilled water on the top of the cups. After this period, mortality rates were calculated.

Data analysis

Data were analyzed using Genstat (15th edition). Pearson chi-square (χ2) test was applied to compare incidence rates before and after intervention and between treated and control localities. The same test was also used to compare the gravidity rate across study areas. The significance level was set at 5%.

Reduction in sand fly abundance due to spraying was estimated by the formula of Mulla et al.[9]:
% of reduction = 100 C 1 / T 1 × T 2 / C 2 × 100

C1: sand fly abundance before spraying date in control localities

C2: sand fly abundance after spraying date in control localities

T1: sand fly abundance before spraying in treated localities

T2: sand fly abundance after spraying in treated localities

C1 and T1 have been estimated considering the mean of sand fly abundance over the month before spraying date.

C2 and T2 correspond to the mean of sand fly abundance over the 10 weeks following the spraying date (this period corresponds to the duration of the residual effect of alphacypermethrin in this study).

Results

Epidemiological impact of intervention

Table 1 shows the evolution of leishmaniasis incidence in treated and control localities.
Table 1

Cutaneous leishmaniasis incidence (/1000) in treated and control localities

  Arm

Localities

2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

Treated

Mrouj

10.32

1.29

0.00

Ait chaib

2.92

00

0.00

Total

6.85

0.68

0.00

  

[2.63-59.02]

[0.41-8.84]

 

Control

Aichoun

8.98

3.37

5.61

Bouassem

13.57

2.86

10.71

Total

11.79

3.06

8.72

  

[1.45-40.44]

[0.16-6.36]

[1.61-40.56]

Between [ ]: 95% confidence intervals.

Before spraying there was an incidence of 7 per 1000 cases in sprayed localities; this dropped significantly (p < 0.001) to 0 per 1000 after two spraying cycles. After IRS, CL incidence in the intervention area was significantly (p < 0.001) lower than in unsprayed localities (0 vs 9 per 1000).

Entomological impact of intervention

Sand fly abundance

During two years of capture (2011–2012), 3315 sand flies were collected (in the four localities) and identified. They comprised seven species: Ph. sergenti, Ph. longicuspis, Ph. perniciousis, Ph. papatasi, Ph. ariasi, Sergentomyia minuta and S. fallax. Ph. sergenti was the most prevalent species in the four areas, it constitutes 87.0%, 50.4%, 73.4%, and 64.9% of total sand flies collected in Aichoun, Bouassem, Ait Chaib and Mrouj respectively (Table 2).
Table 2

Number of sand flies collected in the four localities during the two study years

 

Aichoune

Bouassem

Ait Chaib

Mrouj

Total

 

Male

Female

%

Male

Female

%

Male

Female

%

Male

Female

%

 

Ph. sergenti

1501

256

87.0

261

76

50.4

155

22

73.4

192

62

65.8

2525

Ph. longicuspis

36

8

2.2

45

4

7.3

18

2

8.3

82

41

31.9

236

Ph. perniciosus

88

17

5.2

219

51

40.4

37

2

16.2

5

3

2.1

422

Ph. papatasi

85

6

4.5

3

0

0.4

4

1

2.1

0

0

0.0

99

Ph. ariasi

0

0

0.0

3

0

0.4

0

0

0.0

1

0

0.3

4

S. minuta

2

0

0.1

3

0

0.4

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

5

S. fallax

7

13

1.0

2

2

0.6

0

0

0.0

0

0

0.0

24

Total

1719

300

100

536

133

100

214

27

100

280

106

100

3315

Figure 2 shows the evolution of mean sand fly abundance in each study arm. Generaly, sand fly activity starts from May and lasts to October. Abundance of sand flies, both in control and treated localities presented two well marked peaks. The first occurred in May-June and the second in August-September.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1756-3305-6-354/MediaObjects/13071_2013_Article_1129_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Sand fly abundance evolution during 2011–2012. a) in sprayed localities (Arrows indicate spraying dates). b) in unsprayed localities.

Overall, there was no differences in the evolution of sand fly densities in control and treated localities. Compared to control arm, sprayed localities showed a slight reduction in sand fly abundance during 2011 (8%) while an increase in abundance (79%) was observed during 2012 (Table 3).
Table 3

Reduction rate of sand fly abundance in treated localities in comparison to that of control localities

Year

C1

C2

T1

T2

Abundance reduction(%)

2011

26.1

19.6

9.3

6.4

08%

2012

27.9

14.1

6.6

5.9

−79%

Sand fly gravidity rate

Before intervention (May-June), three females from a total of 40 (7.5%) were gravid in the IRS arm (8% in Ait chaib and 6% in Mrouj). After IRS, gravidity was significantly reduced from 7.5 to 0% (p = 0.008) (Table 4).
Table 4

Gravidity rate of female sand flies observed before and after IRS in treated and control areas

  

Before spraying

After spraying

  

Dissected (gravid) females

Gravidity% [95% CI]

Dissected (gravid) females

Gravidity% [95% CI]

Control

Aichoun

44 (3)

7

95 (11)

12

Bouassem

67 (7)

10

34 (5)

15

Total

111 (10)

9.1

129 (16)

12

   

[0.7-59.4]

 

[3.3-36.9]

Treated

Mrouj

16 (1)

6

70 (0)

0

Ait chaib

24 (2)

8

17 (0)

0

Total

40 (3)

7.5

87 (0)

0

   

[1.3-33.6]

  

In the control arm, the gravidity rate increased from 9% in May-June to 12% in July-August.

Difference in gravidity rates between the overall control and treated areas after spraying (12% vs 0%) is significant (p < 0.001).

Insecticide residual activity

Results of bioefficacy test showed satisfactory percentages of mortality one day after spraying (89.3%); but this decreased progressively with weeks: 84.4%, 82.9%; 80.5, 78.2 and 72.8% after 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks after intervention, respectively (Table 5). The residual activity of the insecticide three months after the spraying was only 61.45%.
Table 5

Mortality rates of Phlebotomus sergenti females in the bioassay cones in Ait Chaib locality

Time

Exposed sand flies (dead)

Mortality (%)

Pre spraying

171 (11)

06.43

Post spraying

  

01 day

178 (159)

89.32

02 weeks

180 (152)

84.44

04 weeks

175 (145)

82.86

06 weeks

170 (137

80.59

08 weeks

179 (140)

78.21

10 weeks

180 (131)

72.78

12 weeks

179 (110)

61.45

Ph sergenti susceptibility to pyrethroids

Results of wild collected Ph. sergenti susceptibility tests to lambdacyhalothrin are presented in Table 6.
Table 6

Insecticide susceptibility tests of Phlebotomus sergenti to lambdacyhalothrin

Exposed sand flies

Mortality (%)

KDT50 (min)

KDT90 (min)

76

100

11

20

Lambdacyhalothrin induced a Ph. sergenti knockdown of 100% after less than 30 min of contact and no specimen survived after 60 min exposure. Tested populations of Ph. sergenti showed a normal susceptibility to this insecticide.

Discussion

The results presented here show that in areas with low leishmaniasis incidence (<15 per 1000), indoor residual spraying with alphacypermethrin can lead to a significant reduction in leishmaniasis transmission. In both localities under intervention, leishmaniasis incidence and gravidity rate have been significantly reduced. However, sand fly abundance was not significantly affected. In fact, sand flies were collected from animal shelters, which are also reproduction, resting and blood feeding sites. As IRS is directed exclusively against adult stages, larvae will not be affected until the emergence of adults and their contact with treated surfaces. Once on the walls, young blood fed adults are killed and do not have time to rest inside to digest their blood meal. It is known that sand fly larval development is slow and uneven mainly under temperate conditions [10, 11]. The emergence of young flies that belonged to the same batch of eggs may extend over a long period (up to two months). The continuous emergence of adults continually replenished the population.

Similar results were observed in Brazil by Passerat de Silans et al. [12] who showed that residual insecticide applications of cypermethrin had no effect on the overall density of peridomiciliar Lutzomyia longipalpis populations. Alexander et al. [13] also found that residual spraying of walls with delthamethrin in a Colombian village surrounded by forest had no perceptible effect on the number of sand flies entering houses; although the insecticidal activity of the treated surfaces was undiminished during the study period. While other authors reported that residual pyrethroid spraying reduces sand fly indoor density in various localities in South America [1416] and China [17] probably, because of their repulsive effect.

The residual effects of pyrethroid insecticides reported in the literature are variable according to formulations, doses used, types of surfaces tested and species of sand flies exposed. In this program, the residual effect of alphacypermethrin, at a dose of 30 mg/m2, remained for less than three months (about 10 weeks). A shorter duration was reported by Morsy et al. [18] in Egypt where the exposition of Ph. papatasi, during 30 min, on cement walls treated with permethrin, 75 days after treatment involved only 51.9% of mortality. A similar duration was reported by Passerat De Silans et al. [12] who indicated that residual activity of cypermethrin against Lu. longipalpis in Brazil was limited to two months.

Longer periods were also reported in rural areas of the new World tropics. Le Pont et al. [14] reported that one deltamethrin spray application in Bolivia was enough to eliminate Lu. longipalpis from the dwelling during 9 months. Falcao et al. [15] demonstrated that the residual action of deltamethrin remained for more than one year on walls of concrete and lime painted in a Brazilian focus of American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Davies et al. [16] confirmed that, with a concentration of 25 mg/m2 of lambdacyhalothrin, the insecticide remained 100% lethal for the sand fly Lu verrucarum for up to 6 months in endemic villages of Peru.

Hence, because of the low residual activity of alphacypermethrin (less than three months) and the long sand flies development period in Morocco (more than 6 months), one spray round per year is not sufficiently powerful to control sand fly populations in many regions of Morocco. Indeed, sand fly populations peaked twice during the season, at the end of spring: May-June and again at the end of summer: August-September [19]. This bi-modal population density pattern is characteristic of Ph. sergenti in semi arid habitats and has to be taken into account when determining the best application schedule of insecticide. Ambient conditions (temperature and humidity) were more favourable to transmission during periods corresponding to the second peak. Insecticide persistence should largely cover this period.

Application of insecticide during the two years of the study in the two localities has taken place after the first peak (end of June). Insecticide remained effective during the following months (July-August). The insecticide has no more efficacy at the beginning of September, when conditions become favourable to transmission. This suggests that two spray rounds are needed to maintain good effectiveness. The first should begin early in the season before the first peak of sand fly populations early in May (in order to kill the maximum number of sand flies throughout the whole season) and the second round early in August. However, such a strategy implicates an increase in the cost of leishmaniasis prevention and cannot be implemented everywhere. It must be reserved only for areas with the highest leishmaniasis transmission.

Conclusion

This study indicated that IRS has a significant impact on leishmaniasis transmission; therefore it could be recommended as an effective tool for leishmaniasis control in areas with high leishmaniasis transmission.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gaboun Fatima who kindly agreed to analyse data. They wish to extend their sincere thanks to the staff of medical Delegations of Boulemane, Sefrou and Taounate for their kind assistance in the field work. This investigation received financial assistance from WHO. Project ID No: EMDCD 1004953.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire d’Entomologie Médicale, Institut National d’Hygiène
(2)
Service de lutte Antivectorielle, Direction de l’Epidémiologie et de Lutte contre les Maladies

References

  1. Rioux JA: Trente ans de coopération franco-marocaine sur les leishmanioses: Dépistage et analyse des foyers. Facteurs de risque. Changements climatiques et dynamique nosogéographique. Assoc des Anciens Elèves de l’Institut Pasteur. 2001, 168: 90-101.Google Scholar
  2. Guilvard E, Rioux JA, Gallego M, Pratlong F, Mahjour J, Martinez-Ortega E, Dereure J, Saddiki A, Martini A: Leishmania tropica au Maroc III-Rôle de Phlebotomus sergenti. A propos de 89 isolats. Ann Parasitol Hum Comp. 1991, 66: 96-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rhajaoui M: Les leishmanioses humaines au Maroc: une diversité nosogéographique. Pathol Biol. 2011, 59 (4): 226-229. 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.09.003.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0369811409001813,View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Faraj C, Ouahabi S, Adlaoui E, Elkohli M, Lakraa L, Elrhazi M, Ameur B: Insecticide susceptibility status of Phlebotomus (Paraphlebotomus) sergenti and Phlebotomus (Phlebotomus) papatasi in endemic foci of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Morocco. Parasit Vectors. 2012, 5: 51-10.1186/1756-3305-5-51. doi:10.1186/1756-3305-5-51. http://www.parasitesandvectors.com/content/pdf/1756-3305-5-51.pdfPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Moroccan Ministry of Public Health: Etat d’avancement des Programmes de Lutte contre les Maladies Parasitaires. 2012, Rabat: Direction de l’Epidémiologie et de Lutte contre les MaladiesGoogle Scholar
  6. Lewis DJ: Phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera. Psychodidae) of the Oriental Region. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol Ser. 1978, 37: 217-343.Google Scholar
  7. World Health Organization: Insecticide resistance and vector control. Seventeeth Report of the WHO Expert Committee on Insecticides, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 443. 1970, Geneva: WHOGoogle Scholar
  8. World Health Organization: Instructions for determining the susceptibility or resistance of adult blackflies, sand flies and biting midges to insecticides. 1981, Geneva: WHO/VBC/81.810, WHOGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulla MS, Norland RL, Fanara DM, Darwazeh HA, McKean DW: Control of chironomid midges in recreational lakes. J Econ Entomol. 1971, 64: 300-307.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmidt ML: Laboratory culture of two Phlebotomus species, P. papatasi and P. orientalis. Bull World Health Organ. 1964, 31: 577-578.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Killick-Kendrick R: Phlebotomine vectors of the leishmaniases: a review. Med Vet Entomol. 1990, 4: 1-24. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1990.tb00255.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. de Passerat Silans LNM, Dedet JP, Arias JR: Field monitoring of cypermethrin residual effect on the mortality rates of the phlebotomine sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis in the state of Paraiba. Brazil.Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1998, 93: 339-344. 10.1590/S0074-02761998000300012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Alexander B, Jaramillo C, Usma MC, Roa W, Travi BL: An Attempt to control phlebotomine sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) by residual spraying with delthamethrin in a Colombian village. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1995, 90: 421-424. 10.1590/S0074-02761995000300020.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Le Pont F, Padilla JM, Desjeux P, Richard A, Mouchet J: Impact de pulverisations de deltamethrine dans un foyer de leishmaniose de Bolivie. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1989, 69: 223-232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Falcao AL, Falcao AR, Pinto CT, Gontijo CM, Falqueto A: Effectof deltamethrin spraying on the sand fly populations in a focusof American cutaneous leishmaniasis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1991, 86: 399-404. 10.1590/S0074-02761991000400004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies CR, Llanos-Cuentas EA, Campos P, Monge J, Leon E, Canales J: Spraying houses in the Peruvian Andes with lambdacyhalothrin protects residents against cutaneous leishmaniasis. T Roy Soc Trop Med H. 2000, 94: 631-636. 10.1016/S0035-9203(00)90214-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Xiong G, Jin C: Studies on deltamethrin in the control of peridomestic wild phlebotomus chinensis. Chinese Journal of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases. 1987, 5: 176-179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Morsy TA, Aboul-Ela RG, El-Gozamy BMR, Salama MMI, Ragheb DA: Residual effects of four insecticides applied for indoor control of Phlebotomus papatasi (Scopoli). J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 1993, 23: 485-492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Faraj C, Adlaoui E, Ouahabi S, El Kohli M, El Rhazi M, Lakraa L, Ameur B: Distribution and bionomics of sand flies in five ecologically different cutaneous leishmaniasis foci in Morocco. ISRN Epidemiology. 2013, 8-http://www.hindawi.com/isrn/epidemiology/2013/145031/,Google Scholar

Copyright

© Faraj et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement