Open Access

Detection and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in the blood and milk of naturally infected donkeys (Equus asinus)

  • Francesca Mancianti1Email author,
  • Simona Nardoni1,
  • Roberto Papini1,
  • Linda Mugnaini1,
  • Mina Martini1,
  • Iolanda Altomonte1,
  • Federica Salari1,
  • Carlo D’Ascenzi1 and
  • Jitender P Dubey1
Parasites & Vectors20147:165

DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-165

Received: 18 December 2013

Accepted: 31 March 2014

Published: 3 April 2014

Abstract

Background

Toxoplasma gondii is a worldwide zoonotic protozoan. Consumption of raw milk from infected animals is considered a risk factor for acquiring toxoplasmosis in humans. Recently, donkey milk has been indicated for therapeutic and nutritional purposes and T. gondii infection is common in donkeys. The purpose of the present paper was to detect the presence of parasite DNA in milk of T. gondii positive donkeys.

Findings

Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 11 out of 44 healthy lactating donkeys by IFAT. T. gondii DNA was detected by PCR in blood of 6 and milk of 3 seropositive jennies. Results of limited RFLP-PCR genotyping indicated the presence of T. gondii genotype II or III, commonly found in Europe.

Conclusions

The occurrence of T. gondii DNA in milk suggests that the consumption of raw milk from seropositive donkeys could be a potential source of human infection.

Keywords

Toxoplasma gondii Donkey Seroprevalence Milk Genotype Italy

Findings

Infections with Toxoplasma gondii are widely prevalent in humans and animals, especially food animals throughout the world [1]. Infections are usually asymptomatic in immunocompetent individuals but vertical transmission in humans can lead to the risk of stillbirth, fetal death in utero, or severe central nervous system involvement in newborns, such as cerebral calcifications and hydrocephalus [2]. In immunocompromised individuals toxoplasmosis may cause encephalitis, pneumonitis and life-threatening disease [3]. Drinking raw goat milk has been identified as one of the risk factors for acquiring postnatal toxoplasmosis in humans and pigs [1].

During the last five decades, Italian autochthonous donkeys (Equus asinus) suffered from a severe reduction in population size, which led to the extinction of six breeds [4]. At present, nine breeds remain in this country, all classified by FAO as critically endangered or endangered. These include the Asino Amiatina, Asino Argentato di Sologno, Asino Asinara, Asino di Martina Franca, Asino di Pantelleria, Asino Ragusana, Asino Romagnolo, Asino Sardo, and Asino Grigio Siciliano [4]. As a consequence, Italian public institutions and private breeders associations made strong efforts to preserve the still existing autochthonous breeds [5]. Following this strategy, efforts are being made to promote the use of all the remaining Italian donkey breeds in recreational activities (agritourism, trekking) and onotherapy (especially with children) as well as in meat (salami, stew) and milk (cosmetics industry, human nutrition) production [46]. The composition of donkey milk is the closest to woman’s milk (relatively poor in protein and fat but rich in lactose) and can be used as a possible substitute for babies, children and adults with Ig E-mediated cow milk allergy [7]. Donkey milk is also recommended as an aid in the prevention of atherosclerosis [8] and tumor therapy [9].

In Italy, farmers are required to follow good hygienic practices but there are no specific rules for donkey breeding and milk production [6]. According to the existing European legislation (reg. EC 853/ 2004 and 1662/2006), raw milk from any species can be sold immediately after milking and directly by the producer to the consumer, or to a local milk seller which in turn is the supplier to final consumers, without any thermal treatment except refrigeration between 0 and 4°C [10]. Given that, recently donkey milk has been increasingly rediscovered as an appreciated source of nourishing food for humans [6], knowledge on safety, quality and hygiene of this milk may become of crucial importance to some categories of consumers (cases of low immune system defenses, elderly, convalescence, infants with cow milk allergy when breast-feeding is not possible). The quality of raw donkey milk has been evaluated microbiologically [11]. Recently, viable T. gondii has been detected in raw milk from cows, sheep, goats, buffaloes, and camels [12]. The aim of the present study was to detect T. gondii in donkey milk.

In the present study, blood and milk specimens from 44 adult lactating jennies (Asino Amiatina breed, 6 to 14 years old) were obtained during winter 2013. The animals were semi-intensively farmed in paddocks and were healthy, as confirmed by general physical examination. The Asino Amiatina breed was chosen arbitrarily since Tuscany is the top region in terms of population of these donkeys in Italy [4]. Antibodies to T. gondii were assayed by immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT), using commercially available antigen coated 12 well slides (VMRD Inc., Pullman, Washington, USA) and anti-horse-IgG FITC antibody produced in rabbit (Sigma-Aldrich; PBS dilution 1:32). All serum samples were screened at a dilution of 1:20, and positive sera were end-titrated using 2-fold dilutions. After results of serological tests were known, blood samples from seropositive jennies were processed for DNA extraction and subsequent amplification by nested-PCR (n-PCR) as previously described [13], while samples from seronegative jennies were discarded. Similarly, when results on blood samples were known, milk samples (50 ml) from n-PCR positive jennies were processed as above, while samples from negative jennies were discarded. Milk sampling was performed under sterile condition; teats were cleaned and wiped, and 3 squirts of milk were discarded prior to collection in sterile single use plastic vials. Milk contains minor quantities of nucleated cells in comparison to whole blood, so prior to DNA extraction, concentration was carried out by centrifugation at 2200 g for 5 minutes [14]. To avoid interference by casein, 1 ml of pellet was treated with 200 μl TE [1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris–HCl (pH = 7.6)] and 300 μl 0.5 M EDTA (pH = 8), then it was resuspended and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10′ [15]. Somatic cells were diluted in 200 μl of PBS and DNA was extracted from both blood and milk somatic cells using the QIAamp® DNA minikit (Qiagen, Milan, Italy) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermic cycle step at 94°C for 5′ we used also denatures the lactoperoxidase present in milk; lactoperoxidase can act against the Taq DNA Polymerase in PCR based-methods. Genotypic characterization of T. gondii DNA was performed by PCR amplification of 12 genetic markers (SAG1, 3-SAG2, 5-SAG2, SAG2 new, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, C22-8, C29-2, L358, PK1, and Apico) as reported [16].

Antibodies to T. gondii were found in 11 out of 44 donkeys with antibody titers of 1/160 (n = 2), 1/80 (n = 1), 1/40 (n = 3) and 1/20 (n = 5). T. gondii DNA was recovered from blood of 6 and milk of 3 seropositive donkeys (aged 8, 11 and 14 years, respectively). Results of IFAT and n-PCR are summarized in Table 1. Results of genotyping are shown in Table 2. Although we did not get amplification with all markers, available data indicated the presence of genotype III (n = 5) or II (n = 1). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of T. gondii DNA in blood and milk samples from donkeys and its genotyping in this host species.
Table 1

Toxoplasma gondii -antibody titers and results of molecular analysis as determined by immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) and nested-PCR (n-PCR) performed on serum, blood and milk samples of lactating jennies, respectively

Sample ID

IFAT titers

Blood n-PCR

Milk n-PCR

1

1/40

Positive

Positive

2

1/160

Positive

Positive

3

1/40

Positive

Positive

4

1/160

Positive

Negative

5

1/80

Negative

Not performed

6

1/20

Negative

Not performed

7

1/20

Negative

Not performed

8

1/20

Positive

Negative

9

1/20

Negative

Not performed

10

1/40

Positive

Negative

11

1/20

Negative

Not performed

Table 2

Toxoplasma gondii genotypes identified in blood and milk of PCR positive jennies

Sample identification nos.

Genetic markers

SAG1

3′SAG2

5′SAG2

SAG2 new

SAG3

ΒTUB

C22-8

C29-2

GRA6

L358

PK1

Apico

1

ND

III

III

III

III

ND

III

III

ND

III

ND

III

2

ND

III

III

III

III

III

III

III

ND

III

ND

ND

3

II

II

II

ND

II

ND

II

II

ND

ND

II

ND

4

III

III

ND

III

III

III

ND

III

III

ND

ND

III

8

ND

III

ND

III

III

ND

ND

III

ND

ND

ND

ND

10

ND

III

III

III

ND

ND

ND

III

III

ND

III

ND

ND = No data.

The seroprevalence of T. gondii infection in donkeys is frequently high, including seropositivity rates of 45% [17] and 65.6% [18] in Egypt, 43.2% in Brazil [19], 34% in Spain [20], 20.3% [21] and 23.6% [22] in China, from 5 to 8% in Italy [23], and 6.4% in the United States of America [24]. Additionally, milk was found to be positive for T. gondii antibodies in 46.3% of pregnant jennies [17]. In our study, T. gondii antibodies were found in 25% of serum samples from lactating jennies with T. gondii DNA in 13.6% and 6.8% of blood and milk samples from them, respectively. Therefore, a high proportion (27.3%) of lactating seropositive jennies were carrying T. gondii DNA in milk. T. gondii infection in lactating jennies may result in intermittent excretion of T. gondii in milk, as suggested in 3 cases (4, 8 and 10) where the results of n-PCR in blood samples were positive but their results in milk were negative. The stage of T. gondii excreted in milk of any animal is unknown, but presumed to be the tachyzoite. We did not make any attempt to determine whether T. gondii DNA in lactating jennies was from viable organisms. In a recent report from Iran, 5.7% of raw milk samples from bovine, ovine, caprine, buffalo and camel herds were reported to have viable T. gondii as determined by bioassays [12]. Consumption of raw milk has been epidemiologically linked to clinical toxoplasmosis in humans, sometimes with serious consequences [1]. This report adds some hints to this parasite’s knowledge, together with results obtained with other approaches [25], even if further studies are needed to determine viability and the stage of T. gondii excreted in milk.

Results of the present study and those of others [12] suggest the possibility of transmission of toxoplasmosis to humans following consumption of raw milk from animals other than the goat.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie, Viale delle Piagge

References

  1. Jones JL, Dubey JP: Foodborne toxoplasmosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 55: 845-851. 10.1093/cid/cis508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Havelaar AH, Kemmeren JM, Kortbeek LM: Disease burden of congenital toxoplasmosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44: 1467-1474. 10.1086/517511.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ajzenberg D, Yera H, Marty P, Paris L, Dalle F, Menotti J, Aubert D, Franck J, Bessières MH, Quinio D, Pelloux H, Delhaes L, Desbois N, Thulliez P, Robert-Gangneux F, Kauffmann-Lacroix C, Pujol S, Rabodonirina M, Bougnoux ME, Cuisenier B, Duhamel C, Duong TH, Filisetti D, Flori P, Gay-Andrieu F, Pratlong F, Nevez G, Totet A, Carme B, Bonnabau H: Genotype of 88 Toxoplasma gondii isolates associated with toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients and correlation with clinical findings. J Infect Dis. 2009, 199: 1155-1167. 10.1086/597477.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kugler W, Grunenfelder H-P, Broxham E: Donkey breeds in Europe: inventory, description, need for action, conservation. Report 2007/2008. Monitoring Institute for Rare Breeds and Seeds in Europe/SAVE Foundation: St Gallen, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Colli L, Perrotta G, Negrini R, Bomba L, Bigi D, Zambonelli P, Verini Supplizi A, Liotta L, Ajmone-Marsan P: Detecting population structure and recent demographic history in endangered livestock breeds: the case of the Italian autochthonous donkeys. Anim Genet. 2013, 44: 69-78. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02356.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Milonis E, Polidori P: Latte di asina: produzione, caratteristiche, gestione delle aziende. Fondazione Iniziative Zooprofilattiche e Zootecniche, Brescia, 2011Google Scholar
  7. Polidori P, Vincenzetti S: Use of donkey milk in children with cow’s milk protein allergy. Foods. 2013, 2: 151-159. 10.3390/foods2020151.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Tafaro A, Magrone T, Jirillo F: Immunological properties of donkey’s milk: its potential use in the prevention of atherosclerosis. Curr Pharm Des. 2007, 13: 3711-3717. 10.2174/138161207783018590.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mao X, Gu J, Sun Y, Xu S, Zhang X, Yang H, Ren F: Anti-proliferative and anti-tumor effect of active components in donkey milk on A549 human lung cells. Int Dairy J. 2009, 19: 703-708. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.05.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Salimei E, Fantuz F: La produzione di latte di asina in una innovativa filiera latte per consumatori di fascia sensibile. Riv Sc Alim – J Food Sci Nutr. 2010, 39: 25-39.Google Scholar
  11. Sarno E, Santoro AML, Di Palo R, Costanzo N: Microbiological quality of raw donkey milk from Campania Region. It J Anim Sc. 2012, 11: 266-269.Google Scholar
  12. Dehkordi FS, Borujeni MR, Rahimi E, Abdizadeh R: Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in raw caprine, ovine, buffalo, bovine, and camel milk using cell cultivation, cat bioassay, capture ELISA, and PCR methods in Iran. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2013, 10: 120-125. 10.1089/fpd.2012.1311.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones CD, Okhravi N, Adamson P, Tasker S, Lightman S: Comparison of PCR detection methods for B1, P30, and 18S rDNA genes of T. gondii in aqueous humor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000, 41: 634-644.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy MA, Shariflou MR, Moran C: High quality genomic DNA extraction from large milk samples. J Dairy Res. 2002, 69: 645-649.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Psifidi A, Dovas ID, Banos G: A comparison of six methods for genomic DNA extraction suitable for PCR-based genotyping applications using ovine milk samples. Mol Cell Probes. 2010, 24: 93-98. 10.1016/j.mcp.2009.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Su C, Shwab EK, Zhou P, Zhu XQ, Dubey JP: Moving towards an integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology. 2010, 137: 1-11. 10.1017/S0031182009991065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Haridy FM, Shoukry NM, Hassan AA, Morsy TA: ELISA-seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in draught horses in Greater Cairo, Egypt. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2009, 39: 821-826.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. El-Ghaysh A: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Egyptian donkeys using ELISA. Vet Parasitol. 1998, 80: 71-73. 10.1016/S0304-4017(98)00177-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. de Oliveira E, de Albuquerque PP, de Souza Neto OL, Faria EB, Júnior JW, Mota RA: Occurrence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in mules and donkeys in the northeast of Brazil. J Parasitol. 2013, 99: 343-345. 10.1645/GE-3210.1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Bocanegra I, Cabezón O, Arenas-Montes A, Carbonero A, Dubey JP, Perea A, Almería S: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in equids from Southern Spain. Parasitol Int. 2012, 61: 421-424. 10.1016/j.parint.2012.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miao Q, Wang X, She LN, Fan YT, Yuan FZ, Yang JF, Zhu XQ, Zou FC: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in horses and donkeys in Yunnan Province, Southwestern China. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 168-10.1186/1756-3305-6-168.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang N, Mu MY, Yuan GM, Zhang GX, Li HK, He JB: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in slaughtered horses and donkeys in Liaoning province, northeastern China. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 140-10.1186/1756-3305-6-140.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Machacova T, Bartova E, DI Loria A, Sedlak K, Mariani U, Fusco G, Fulgione D, Veneziano V, Dubey JP: Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in donkeys (Equus asinus) in Italy. J Vet Med Sci. 2013, in pressGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubey JP, Ness SL, Kwok OC, Choudhary S, Mittel LD, Divers TJ: Seropositivity of Toxoplasma gondii in domestic donkeys (Equus asinus) and isolation of T. gondii from farm cats. Vet Parasitol. 2014, 199: 18-23. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.09.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. McGovern KE, Wilson EH: Dark side illuminated: imaging of Toxoplasma gondii through the decades. Parasit Vectors. 2013, 6: 334-10.1186/1756-3305-6-334.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Mancianti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Advertisement