Skip to main content

Table 2 Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of COPT and IHA methods for diagnosing S. japonicum infection

From: A diagnostic challenge for schistosomiasis japonica in China: consequences on praziquantel-based morbidity control

Method

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

*PPV

(%)

*NPV

(%)

*Prevalence

(%)

Reference gold standard

Author and date of publication

*COPT

85.8

54.1

36.6

92.5

23.6

KK (3 slides)

He et al. 2007 [16]

 

82.8

57.7

48.1

87.7

32.1

MHT

He et al. 2007 [16]

 

85.2

95.6

74.9

97.7

13.4

MHT

Zhu et al. 2005 [26]

 

72.2

93.7

31.7

98.8

3.9

combined results of KK (3 slides) and MHT

Song et al. 2003 [19]

*IHA

80.0

93.6

18.8

99.6

1.7

MHT

Zhang et al. 2010 [27]

 

69.7

89.4

36.8

96.8

8.9

two repeated KK results (12 slides)

Lin et al. 2008 [28]

 

97-100

60-77

19-30

100.0

3.1-14.2

KK examination (3 slides)

Zhou et al. 2008 [29]

 

83.7-92.3

55.8-67.3

16.6-30.2

93.7-99.2

6.6-18.6

two repeated KK results (6 slides)

Zhou et al. 2007 [14]

 

76.0-85.6

35.7-63.6

8.9-22.2

94.8-97.7

6.2-12.0

combined results of KK (3 slides) and MHT

Xu et al. 2007 [15]

 

80.3

48.4

77.0

53.3

68.3

seven repeated KK examinations (14 slides)

Yu et al. 2007 [17]

 

66.7-100.0

67.6-91.6

2.9-15.8

97.6-100.0

0.3-5.7

two repeated KK results (6 slides)

Wang et al.2006 [30]

 

82.1

71.1

26.8

96.9

9.2

KK (3 slides)

Li et al. 2002 [31]

  1. *PPV = Positive predictive value; *NPV = Negative predictive value; *COPT = Circumoval precipitin test; *IHA = Indirect hemagglutination assay;
  2. *Prevalence is calculated based on the reference gold standard