|
I. ricinus
|
D. reticulatus
|
---|
| | | | |
No. positive (%)
| | | |
No. positive (%)
|
---|
|
Total no. investigated
|
Babesiaspp.
|
A. phagocytophilum
|
Total no. investigated
|
Babesiaspp.
|
---|
Site
|
F
|
M
|
N
|
Total
|
F
|
M
|
N
|
Total
|
F
|
M
|
N
|
Total
|
F
|
M
|
Total
|
F
|
M
|
Total
|
E
|
45
|
56
|
6
|
107
|
0 (0)
|
4 (7.1)
|
1 (16.7)
|
5 (4.7)
|
7 (15.6)
|
5 (8.9)
|
0 (0)
|
12 (11.2)
|
309
|
190
|
499
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
F
|
6
|
4
|
10
|
20
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
29
|
21
|
50
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
G
|
6
|
2
|
13
|
21
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
111
|
80
|
191
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
H
|
74
|
53
|
45
|
172
|
8 (10.8)
|
6 (11.3)
|
1 (2.2)
|
15 (8.7)
|
2 (2.7)
|
2 (3.8)
|
0 (0)
|
4 (2.3)
|
48
|
16
|
64
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
I
|
81
|
104
|
34
|
219
|
0 (0)
|
1 (0.96)
|
1 (2.9)
|
2 (0.9)
|
10 (12.3)
|
18 (17.3)
|
3 (8.8)
|
31 (14.2)
|
n. a.
|
n. a.
|
n. a.
|
n. a.
|
n. a.
|
n. a.
|
Total Leipzig
|
212
|
219
|
108
|
539
|
9 (4.3)
|
11 (5.0)
|
3 (2.8)
|
22 (4.1) 1 x
Bcap
, 3 x
B
. sp. EU1, 18 x
Bm
|
19 (9.0)
|
25 (11.4)
|
3 (2.8-3.7)
|
47 (8.7)
|
497
|
307
|
804
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
Bavaria
|
42
|
58
|
28
|
128
|
4 (9.5)
|
3 (5.2)
|
0 (0)
|
7 (5.5) (2 x
Bd
, 2 x
B.
sp. EU1, 3 x
Bm
)
|
1 (2.4)
|
10 (17.2)
|
1 (3.6)
|
12 (9.4)
|
95
|
40
|
135
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
0 (0)
|
Saarlanda
|
43
|
36
|
36
|
115
|
2 (4.7)
|
4 (11.1)
|
1-2 (2.8-5.1)
|
7 (6.1)
b
1 x
B.
sp.
EU1, 4 x
Bm
, 2 x
Ba
|
9 (21.0)
|
9 (25.0)
|
2-7 (5.6-19.4)
|
20 (17.4)
b
| | | | | | |
- Bcap, Babesia capreoli; Bd, Babesia divergens; B. sp. EU1, Babesia sp. EU1; Bm, Babesia microti; Ba, Babesia sp.
- a results of the D. reticulatus from the Saarland have been published elsewhere[14].
- b minimum infection rate: nymphs were investigated in pools of up to five - assuming that only one tick in the pool was infected.