Skip to main content

Table 6 Pathogen prevalence according to the initial screening (all adults) and different sampling strategies (A, B, C) and prevalence difference among each strategy compared to the initial screening (Δ)

From: Occurrence and identification of risk areas of Ixodes ricinus-borne pathogens: a cost-effectiveness analysis in north-eastern Italy

   

Strategy A

Strategy B

Strategy C

Pathogens

all adults

n = 193

female ticks

all year

n = 95

Δ

all ticks

April-June

n = 127

Δ

female ticks

April-June

n = 67

Δ

 

pos

%

pos

%

%

pos

%

%

pos

%

%

B. burgdorferi s.l.

34

17.6

23

24.2

6.6

19

15.0

2.6

14

20.9

3.3

   B. valaisiana

12

6.2

6

6.3

0.1

6

4.7

-1.5

4

6.0

-0.2

   B. afzelii

10

5.2

7

7.4

2.2

4

3.1

-2.0

2

3.0

-2.2

   B. garinii

8

4.1

7

7.4

3.2

7

5.5

1.4

6

9.0

4.1

   B. burgdorferi s.s.

6

3.1

5

5.3

2.2

4

3.1

0.0

4

6.0

2.9

R. helvetica

25

13.1

18

19.1

6.1

20

15.7

2.7

14

21.2

8.1

Ca. N. mikurensis

20

10.5

8

8.5

-2.0

11

8.7

-1.8

5

7.6

-2.0

R. monacensis

7

3.7

3

3.2

-0.5

2

1.6

-2.1

1

1.5

-2.2

TBEv

4

2.1

4

4.2

2.1

4

3.1

1.1

4

6.0

3.9

A. phagocytophilum

3

1.6

3

3.2

1.6

3

2.4

0.8

3

4.5

2.9

Bartonella spp.

2

1.0

0

0.0

-1.0

2

1.6

0.5

0

0.0

-1.0

Babesia EU1

1

0.5

0

0.0

-0.5

1

0.8

0.3

0

0.0

-0.5

Total

77

39.9

44

46.3

6.4

50

39.4

-0.5

31

46.3

6.4