Skip to main content

Table 2 Median number (in bold) of ticks per tick-infested host, i.e., respondent (Homo sapiens) and respondents' dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and domestic cats (Felis catus) recorded during the "tick season" of 2008 for the different Swedish regions

From: Changes in the geographical distribution and abundance of the tick Ixodes ricinus during the past 30 years in Sweden

Region (two or more provinces, "landskap")

Median, (no. obs.), maximum no. ticks per tick-infested human, and (no. and % of uninfested humans)

Median, (no. obs.), maximum no. ticks per tick-infested dog, and (no. and % of uninfested dogs)

Median, (no. obs.), maximum total no. ticks per cat, and (no. and % of uninfested cats)

Northern North:

Norrbotten and Lappland

1b NS (5) 1 (95; 95.0%)

2a NS (26) 12 (5; 16.1%)

1 ab NS (34) 10 (4; 10.5%)

Central North: Medelpad and Ångermanland, Härjedalen, Jämtland, Västerbotten

1.5a NS (2) 2 (22; 91.0%)

2 a NS (11) 20 (1; 8.6%)

2 b NS (10) 8 (1; 10.0%)

Southern North: Dalarna, Gästrikland and Hälsingland

2a NS (43) 15 (35; 81.1%)

10 a ** (45) 1000 (0; 0%)

11b *** (36) 200 (1; 2.7%)

Central: Dalsland, Värmland, Västmanland, Närke, Södermanland and Uppland

5 b *** (311) 225 (58; 18.6%)

25 a *** (123) 1000 (0; 0%)

27.5c *** (156) 100 (0; 0%)

West Coast: Halland, Västergötland and Bohuslän

7b *** (163) 125 (26; 15.9%)

18a *** (54) 500 (2; 3.5%)

25bc *** (75) 1000 (1; 1.3%)

South-East, Baltic Islands: Öland and Gotland,

4 b *** (20) 52 (5; 20.0%)

12.5a *** (6) 120 (1; 14.2%)

20bc *** (10) 500 (0; 0%)

South: Skåne, Blekinge, Småland and Östergötland

5 b *** (201) 125 (46; 18.6%)

21.5a *** (86) 1500 (2; 2.3%)

30b ***(99) 250 (1; 1.0%)

All provinces (landskap)

5*** (745) 225 (287; 27.8%)

15 (351) 1000 (11; 3.0%)

20 (420) 1000 (8; 1.8%)

  1. Medians denoted with the same letter in a column are not significantly different at p = 0.05 (t-test of geometric means). The asterisks at the Wald χ2 -values indicate whether the corresponding geometric mean for the region is different from 0.0; ** 0.01 < P > 0.001, *** = P < 0.001, NS = not significant. In parentheses, after the median number, is shown the number of valid observations on which the median is based, and thereafter the maximum total number of tick specimens estimated by a respondent on one individual host. The last figures (in parentheses) in each column are the number and percentage of hosts without any ticks.