Skip to main content

Table 2 Cumulative counts, prevalence, number of males and females, and male: female ratio of ticks identified

From: Ixodid ticks of traditionally managed cattle in central Nigeria: where Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus does not dare (yet?)

Tick species

Total

Mean prevalence%

Males

Females

Male: female ratio

(95% confidence interval)

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus

1890

41.4

473

1417

1 : 3

(36.5–46.3)

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus

819

15.4

189

630

1 : 3.3

(11.9–19.0)

Rhipicephalus guilhoni

434

12.0

302

132

2.3 : 1

(7.2–16.8)

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) geigyi

306

7.6

45

261

1 : 5.8

(6.1–9.1)

Hyalomma truncatum

681

7.4

469

212

2.2 : 1

(5.8–9.0)

Amblyomma variegatum

361

6.3

245

116

2.1 : 1

(4.5–8.1)

Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) spp.

205

4.1

12

193

1 : 16

(2.9–5.4)

Rhipicephalus simus Group

239

4.0

155

84

1.8 : 1

(2.5–5.5)

Rhipicephalus turanicus

39

1.2

22

17

1.3 : 1

(0.5–2.0)

Rhipicephalus sanguineus

10

0.3

4

6

1 : 1.5

(0.03–1.0)

Hyalomma rufipes

26

0.2

18

8

2.2 : 1

(0.1–0.4)

Rhipicephalus lunulatus

1

<0.1

1

–

1 : 0

(0.0–0.0)