Skip to main content

Table 1 Vector competence of Culex mosquitoes for WNV02 following feeding on infectious bloodmeals

From: The effect of hybridization of Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes on transmission of West Nile virus

Population (female x male)

Day

% Infected1

% Infected disseminating

% Infected transmitting

Cx. p f pipiens (CxP)

7

89.3 M↑ Q↓

89.6 Q↑

3.0 M,Q↓

 

13/14

83.6 Q↓

98.4

34.4 Q↓

Cx. quinquefasciatus (CxQ)

7

100 M,P↑

69.3 P↓

24.0 P↑

 

13/14

100 M,P↑

95.8

63.4 M,P↑

Cx. p f molestus (CxM)

7

69.6 P,Q↓

77.1

16.7 P↑

 

13/14

93.1

90.0

37.5 Q↓

CxM x CxP

7

89.3 M↑

71.6 P↓

13.4

 

13/14

76.0 M,P↓

93.0

57.9 M,P↑

CxP x CxM

7

93.3 M↑

70.0 P↓

7.1

 

13/14

94.6 P↑

97.1

61.4 M,P↑

CxM x CxQ

7

100 M↑

64.0

8.0 Q↓

 

13/14

100

94.7

62.7 M↑

CxQ x CxM

7

100 M↑

58.7

5.3 Q↓

 

13/14

100

93.9

66.1 M↑

CxP x CxQ

7

100 P↑

69.3 P↓

2.7 Q↓

 

13/14

100 P↑

97.3

62.7 P↑

CxQ x CxP

7

100 P↑

86.7 Q↑

18.7 P↑

 

13/14

100 P↑

100

80.3 P,Q↑

  1. 165–75 total mosquitoes tested/population/timepoint.
  2. M,Q,Pdenotes significant differences in populations (chi-squared, p < 0.05) relative to Cx. p f molestus, quinquefasciatus, or p f pipiens, respectively. Arrows denote direction of change relative to control. Parental populations are compared to one another and hybrid populations are compared to corresponding parentals.