Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical differences between the number of trapped individuals per species and the total number of individuals among the four trapping devices

From: Field evaluation of four widely used mosquito traps in Central Europe

Response variable

Traps

Estimate

SE

DF

t

p

Anopheles plumbeus

BG vs. CDC

0.641

0.299

301.2

2.14

0.033

 

BG vs. EVS

0.858

0.299

301.2

2.87

0.004

 

CDC vs. MM

-1.032

0.307

302.1

-3.36

0.001

 

EVS vs. MM

-1.249

0.307

302.1

-4.07

<0.001

Aedes cinereus/geminus

BG vs. CDC

9.304

2.354

301

3.95

<0.001

 

BG vs. EVS

10.002

2.354

301

4.25

<0.001

 

BG vs. MM

6.052

2.418

301.3

2.5

0.013

Aedes vexans

BG vs. CDC

-32.42

7.296

301.1

-4.44

<0.001

 

CDC vs. EVS

20.566

7.293

301.1

2.82

0.005

 

CDC vs. MM

28.547

7.49

301.7

3.81

<0.001

Ochlerotatus cantans

BG vs. CDC

7.732

2.456

301.1

3.15

0.002

 

BG vs. EVS

8.877

2.456

301.1

3.61

<0.001

 

BG vs. MM

13.929

2.524

301.4

5.52

<0.001

 

CDC vs. MM

6.197

2.523

301.4

2.46

0.015

 

EVS vs. MM

5.052

2.523

301.4

2

0.046

Ochlerotatus communis

BG vs. CDC

1.11

0.427

301

2.6

0.01

 

BG vs. EVS

1.11

0.427

301

2.6

0.01

 

BG vs. MM

1.497

0.439

301.2

3.41

0.001

Ochlerotatus excrucians/annulipes

BG vs. EVS

0.299

0.138

301.3

2.17

0.031

 

BG vs. MM

0.418

0.142

302.6

2.95

0.003

Ochlerotatus geniculatus

BG vs. EVS

1.144

0.466

301.1

2.45

0.015

 

BG vs. MM

-1.039

0.479

301.6

-2.17

0.031

 

CDC vs. MM

-1.845

0.479

301.6

-3.85

<0.001

 

EVS vs. MM

-2.183

0.479

301.6

-4.56

<0.001

Ochlerotatus punctor

BG vs. MM

0.976

0.334

301.2

2.92

0.004

Ochlerotatus rusticus

BG vs. CDC

4.198

1.764

301

2.38

0.018

 

BG vs. EVS

7.246

1.764

301

4.11

<0.001

 

EVS vs. MM

-5.159

1.812

301.2

-2.85

0.005

Ochlerotatus sticticus/diantaeus

BG vs. EVS

5.248

1.373

301

3.82

<0.001

 

BG vs. MM

5.675

1.411

301.2

4.02

<0.001

 

CDC vs. EVS

3.542

1.373

301

2.58

0.01

 

CDC vs. MM

3.969

1.411

301.2

2.81

0.005

Culex pipiens/torrentium

BG vs. CDC

8.957

2.797

301.1

3.2

0.002

 

BG vs. EVS

6.475

2.797

301.1

2.31

0.021

 

BG vs. MM

17.026

2.873

302

5.93

<0.001

 

CDC vs. MM

8.069

2.872

301.9

2.81

0.005

 

EVS vs. MM

10.55

2.872

301.9

3.67

<0.001

Culiseta annulata

BG vs. EVS

-0.975

0.347

300.8

-2.81

0.005

 

EVS vs. MM

0.703

0.357

301.4

1.97

0.05

Total

BG vs. EVS

30.106

10.598

301

2.84

0.005

 

BG vs. MM

41.781

10.889

301.3

3.84

<0.001

 

CDC vs. EVS

30.289

10.595

301

2.86

0.005

 

CDC vs. MM

41.965

10.885

301.3

3.86

<0.001

Species

BG vs. CDC

0.446

0.215

301

2.08

0.039

 

BG vs. EVS

0.531

0.215

301

2.47

0.014

 

BG vs. MM

0.619

0.221

301.1

2.8

0.005

  1. Mean +/-SE differences in least squares means associated with the mixed linear models for the number of trapped individuals per trapping period for each species and the total number of individuals and the mean +/-SE number of species among the four trapping devices. Only mosquito species caught with more than 100 individuals are shown and trapping periods were only included if the species was detected with at least one individual in the corresponding trapping period at the sampling location (only significant differences shown). BG: Biogents Sentinel trap, EVS: Heavy Duty Encephalitis Vector Survey trap, CDC: Centres for Disease Control miniature light trap, MM: Mosquito Magnet Patriot Mosquito trap, Estimate: differences in least squares means, SE: standard error, DF: degrees of freedom, t: t-value, p: p value.
Back to article page

Parasites & Vectors

ISSN: 1756-3305

Contact us