Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Sequence differences in IGS between B. burgdorferi B31 and other North American B. burgdorferi strains a

From: Analysis of the intergenic sequences provided by Feria-Arroyo et al. does not support the claim of high Borrelia burgdorferi tick infection rates in Texas and northeastern Mexico

B31 nt B31 297 N40 SGE03-01
85 T A   
100 A G   G
127 A T T T
148 A G G G
155 A G G G
163 G A A A
172 T G G G
175 T C C C
179 A G G G
183 G A A A
184 G A A A
186 T   C  
196 T G G G
295 C T T T
325 T C C  
327 A   G  
332 G A   
347 G   A  
360 C G G G
362 A G G G
366 G    A
391 A    T
409 A G G G
413 G C C C
422 C T   
476 A -   
492 T C C C
496 C T   
511 A C   
541 G   A A
553 G T   
557 A G G G
564 G    A
570 T    C
575 G A A A
593 G   T  
602 T G C C
648 T   C  
653 T C C C
659 G T T T
691 T C   
730 A   C C
739 T G C C
749 C T T T
759 A G G G
761 C T T T
783 A    G
778 C T   
780 C T   
806 G    T
830 G A A A
868 T -   
869 C -   
870 T -   
871 T -   
872 A -   
875 A    T
885 T C   
No. of differences from B31 45 35 37
% Identityb 95.2 96.3 96.1
  1. aB31 coordinates in the aligned sequences (Additional file 1: Figure S1) are indicated. A blank cell indicates that the nucleotide is the same as in B31. “-“ means a relative deletion.
  2. bPercent identity with B31.