Table 2 Gyrodactylus salaris Malmberg, 1957 haplotypes used in previous experiments ascertaining the susceptibility of different strains of Salmo salar L. (A = Atlantic strain; B = Baltic strain)
Reference | Origin ofS. salartested in previous studies (rivers) | Origin of theG. salarisstrain | G. salarishaplotype | Parasite population dynamics | Host response1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bakke [53] | A: Alta, Lone, Drammenselva and Lierelva (Norway) | R. Drammenselva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
| Â | B: Neva (Russia) | R. Drammenselva | F | declining after 3Â weeks | responding |
Bakke and MacKenzie [31] | A: Conon and Shin (Scotland) and Lierelva (Norway) | R. Figga | A* | exponential growth | susceptible |
Bakke et al. [30] | A: Alta and Lone (Norway) | R. Drammenselva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
| Â | B: Neva (Russia) | R. Drammenselva | F | declining after 3Â weeks | innately resistant and responding |
Bakke et al. [65] | A: Akerselva (Norway) | unknown | unknown | exponential growth | susceptible |
Bakke et al. [32] | A: Alta (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | ♀A × ♂ Salmo trutta hybrids: Alta (Norway) × Fossbekk (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | declining after 3 weeks | innately resistant and susceptible |
|  | ♂A × ♀ S. trutta hybrids: Alta (Norway) × Fossbekk (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | elimination in 2 weeks | innately resistant |
Bakke et al. [26] | A: Lierelva (Norway) | R. Rauma | A | exponential growth | susceptible |
| Â | A: Lierelva and Batnfjordselva (Norway) | R. Batnfjordselva and Steinkjerselva | A and A* | exponential growth | susceptible |
| Â | A: Namsen and Alta (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | A × B hybrids: Imsa (Norway) × Neva (Russia) | R. Lierelva | F | declining after 4 weeks | responding |
| Â | B: Neva (Russia) | R. Lierelva | F | declining after 3Â weeks | responding |
Bakke et al. [66] | A: Lierelva (Norway) | R. Figga | A* | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | B: Indalsälv (Sweden) | R. Figga | A* | slightly declining after 4 weeks | responding and susceptible |
Cable et al. [42] | A: Alta and Lierelva (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
| Â | B: Neva (Russia) | R. Lierelva | F | declining after 3Â weeks | innately resistant and responding |
Dalgaard et al. [38] | A: Conon (Scotland) | R. Lærdalselva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | B: Lule (Sweden) | R. Lærdalselva | F | declining after 6 weeks | responding |
Dalgaard et al. [39] | A: Conon (Scotland), Skjern (Denmark) and Bristol Cove (Canada) | R. Lærdalselva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | B: Mörrum (Sweden) | R. Lærdalselva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
Jansen et al. [67] | A: Imsa (Norway) | R. Lierelva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
|  | ♀A × ♂B hybrids: Imsa (Norway) × Neva (Russia) | R. Lierelva | F | exponential growth | susceptible |
current study | A: Dee (Wales), Lærdalselva (Norway) | R. Fusta | A | exponential growth | susceptible |