Table 3 Altitudinal comparisons between hilltop and lowland using geometric morphometrics
| Â | Month | Mahalanobis distance | Allometry (%) | Cross-validation (%) | Centroid size (mm) | Influential Landmark | QST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hilltop X Lowland | Hilltop | Lowland | Hilltop | Lowland | Size | Shape | ||||
♀ | JAN/2009 | 2.980 | 12.736* | 54 | 63 | 1.623 | 1.591 | #1 and #2 | 0.40 | 0.28 |
JAN/2012 | 2.818 | 3.799 | 54 | 53 | 1.519 | 1.455 | #13 and #15 | 0.50 | 0.25 | |
JUL/2012 | 2.542 | 6.548* | 75 | 73 | 1.760* | 1.710* | #1 and #2 | 0.87* | 0.27 | |
JAN/2013 | 8.112 | 5.359* | 91 | 88 | 1.704* | 1.640* | #3 and #15 | 0.92* | 0.28 | |
♂ | JAN/2009 | 5.164 | 15.236* | 59 | 61 | 1.629 | 1.593 | #9 and #18 | 0.43 | 0.25 |
JAN/2012 | 2.329 | 3.462 | 63 | 56 | 1.594* | 1.477* | #1 and #13 | 0.91* | 0.27 | |
JUL/2012 | 2.379 | 6.018* | 69 | 72 | 1.752* | 1.711* | #1 and #2 | 0.75 | 0.31 | |
JAN/2013 | 10.579 | 7.935* | 88 | 96 | 1.673* | 1.629* | #2 and #13 | 0.70 | 0.22 | |