Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of intestinal parasite detection by stool qPCR and microscopy in 99 subjects

From: Identification of human intestinal parasites affecting an asymptomatic peri-urban Argentinian population using multi-parallel quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

Parasite

No. positive by multi-parallel qPCR (%)

No. positive by concentration microscopy (%)

No. positive by McMaster microscopy (%)

DNA concentrations (fg/μL) in stool positive by microscopy, median (range)

DNA concentrations (fg/μL) in stool negative by microscopy, median (range)

Ascaris lumbricoides

56/99 (56.5)

53/99 (53.5)

47/99 (47.5)

1.02 (0.001 – 42.3)

0.48 (0.003–10.431)

Cryptosporidium parvum/hominis

0/99 (0)

NA

NA

NA

NA

Ancylostoma duodenale

19/99 (19.1)

NA

NA

55.1 (5.87–278.2)a

106.9 (26.2–384.2)

Necator americanus

36/99 (36.4)

NA

NA

12.5 (0.024–278.2)a

1.59 (0.001–239.5)

Hookworm*

37/99 (37.4)

21/99 (21.2)a

21/99 (21.2)a

NA

NA

Strongyloides stercoralis*

21/99 (21.2)

3/99 (3.0)

NA

65.9 (14.7–123.6)

0.22 (0.0009–48.6)

Giardia lamblia*

63/99 (63.6)

8/99 (8.1)

NA

5.27 (0.02–1847.4)

0.27 (0.007–5697.8)

Entamoeba histolytica

1/99 (1.0)

0/99 (0)

NA

0.003

0

Trichuris trichiura

1/99 (1.0)

4/99 (4.0)

6/99 (6.1)

0.001

0

  1. NA Not applicable
  2. *Indicates statistically significant difference (P < 0.05)
  3. aMicroscopy is unable to distinguish between the two hookworm species, A. duodenale and N. americanus