Host-dependent morphology of Isthmiophora melis (Schrank, 1788) Luhe, 1909 (Digenea, Echinostomatinae) – morphological variation vs. molecular stability

Table 4 Summary of DFA; the table presents the full list of variables included in the analysis

Roots removed	Eigenvalue	Canonical R	Wilks’ lambda	Chi-square	df	p-value
0	5.207	0.916	0.104	259.857	18	< 0.001
1	0.298	0.479	0.648	49.909	10	< 0.001
2	0.189	0.399	0.841	19.931	4	< 0.001
	Wilks’ lambda	Partial lambda	p-value	Root 1	Root 2	Root 3
BW	0.108	0.966	0.274	−0.001	0.079	0.487
FO	0.132	0.794	< 0.001^*	−0.501	−0.307	−0.698
H	0.111	0.944	0.093	0.282	0.201	0.079
T	0.123	0.854	< 0.001^*	0.483	0.275	−0.460
U	0.127	0.824	< 0.001^*	−0.334	0.230	−0.955
GA/BA	0.137	0.759	< 0.001^*	−0.541	0.718	−0.063
Eigenvalue				5.207	0.298	0.190
Cumulative proportion				0.915	0.966	1.000

Statistically significant variables are marked with asterisk (^*). Chi-square tests with successive roots removed are presented in the upper part of the table. Columns Root 1, Root 2 and Root 3 present standardized coefficients for canonical variables

ISSN: 1756-3305