Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in infection intensity and FOI for each of 32 sentinel sites with longitudinal data collected prior and one year after praziquantel treatment as part of the monitoring and evaluation component of the Ugandan schistosomiasis control programme

From: Estimation of changes in the force of infection for intestinal and urogenital schistosomiasis in countries with schistosomiasis control initiative-assisted programmes

BL infection intensity Category

District

Sentinel Site

No. in cohort (n)

BL FOI (wppy)

Infection intensity with S. mansoni (epg)

Ratio of FOI in relation to BL

BL

FY1

FY2

FY3

ζ1

ζ2

ζ3

High

Bugiri

Buyondo

75

26.97

444.4

59.4a

16.7a

3.5a

0.179a

0.035a

0.015a

Wakawaka

30

30.01

746.3

384.8

539.1

160.0

1.574b

1.698b

0.945

Busia

Buloosi

72

24.78

598.1

99.7a

52.4a

24.0a

0.357a

0.220a

0.099a

Hoima

Kibiro

57

54.87

1000.3

408.6a

153.7a

247.5a

1.038

0.454a

0.553a

Runga

20

47.35

710.4

404.6

230.4a

110.4a

1.444

0.976

0.727

Tonya

9

61.81

1096.0

228.0a

48.0a

48.0a

0.566

0.088a

0.001a

Masindi

Walukubwa

20

62.28

895.2

314.2a

108.9a

974.8

0.591

0.266a

1.346

Mayuge

Bugoto LV

45

24.51

616.5

123.1a

61.8a

50.4a

0.484a

0.235a

0.085a

Bwondha

33

28.94

529.5

83.3a

133.8a

61.1a

0.558a

0.604a

0.263a

Nebbi

Panyimur

67

31.72

597.6

327.9a

84.6a

49.1a

1.993b

0.121a

0.189a

Medium

Bugiri

Busiro

57

12.06

154.9

141.4

51.1a

108.5

1.891b

0.572a

1.312

Busia

Bwaniha

70

20.38

386.1

58.7a

25.0a

42.7a

0.513a

0.187a

0.251a

Hoima

Kasenyi

55

15.46

299.1

347.5

208.9

201.3

1.626b

0.969

1.264

Masindi

Butiaba

31

14.32

300.4

98.3

1.5a

27.0a

0.880

0.009a

0.424a

Kabolwa

23

14.59

452.9

43.8a

0.0a

0.0a

0.198a

0.001a

0.001a

Wanseko

57

10.12

114.2

31.2

20.6a

0.0a

0.465a

0.286a

0.000a

Nebbi

Kinju

52

15.21

104.4

52.9

16.9a

81.1

1.196

0.444a

1.267

Pokwero

59

4.86

105.8

29.0a

1.7a

0.0a

0.929

0.119a

0.023a

Low

Bugiri

Kibimba

41

0.36

13.5

16.2

15.4

0.0a

3.584b

2.214b

0.000a

Kibuye

46

3.58

41.7

8.7

16.2

15.7

0.844

1.325

1.817b

Busia

Maduwa

77

5.46

68.1

7.0a

3.9a

0.4a

0.772a

0.116a

0.010a

Majanji

64

1.66

27.8

2.2

1.5

0.0

0.064a

0.059a

0.000a

Hoima

Kibanjwa

103

0.02

0.2

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.000

0.000

0.000

Mayuge

Bukizbu

59

0.40

7.7

0.6a

0.4a

0.0a

0.114a

0.135a

0.000a

Ikulwe

46

0.04

0.5

0.0

0.0

-

0.246

0.000

-

Lwanika

61

5.96

74.5

7.4a

3.5a

44.3

0.292a

0.222a

1.648b

Moyo

Aliba

39

1.38

62.2

2.1a

5.7a

2.7a

0.056a

0.244a

0.103a

Dufile

69

1.70

60.5

0.7a

4.1a

0.0a

0.008a

0.151a

0.000a

Etele

71

0.16

7.4

8.7

16.4

0.0a

2.882b

9.789b

0.000a

Laropi

68

1.40

41.6

0.0

1.1

0.0

0.000a

0.052a

0.000a

Obongi

50

0.35

34.1

1.5

0.5

0.0

0.324a

0.10002a

0.000a

Nebbi

Pagwaya

54

1.66

49.8

12.0

2.7a

2.1a

0.430a

0.088a

0.087a

  1. BL baseline, FOI force of infection expressed as the mean number of adult female parasites acquired per person per year; wppy: worms per person per year; epg: eggs per gram of faeces, FY1 follow-up year 1, FY2 follow-up year 2, FY3 follow-up year 3; ζ1, ζ2, ζ3: the relative change in the FOI at FY1, FY2, FY3, respectively, as a proportion of that at baseline; astatistically significant reduction in infection intensity or FOI from baseline; bstatistically significant increase in infection intensity or FOI from baseline
  2. Note that the decision to allocate each sentinel site into high, medium, and low infection intensity categories was based on the infection intensity of the overall school/community at BL, rather than that of the longitudinal cohort selected to be followed up from that school/community (e.g. Kabolwa is classified in the medium category as the school-level intensity at BL was 339.4 epg; the cohort level was 452.9 epg). Any cohort with fewer than 20 individuals was excluded