Skip to main content

Table 5 Relative abundance of metacercariae in 25 ponds with matching snail data (fish species represented by less than 10 specimens were grouped together as “Other”)

From: The role of rice fields, fish ponds and water canals for transmission of fish-borne zoonotic trematodes in aquaculture ponds in Nam Dinh Province, Vietnam

Fish species

No. of fish

No. of ponds

Mean metacer-cariae densitya

Maximum density in 1 fish

Weight range (g) of fish

Prevalence of FZT (%)

Count ratio

Odds ratio

Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus)

126

20

9.23

177.7

60–896

90.5

1.00

1.00

Indian carp (Labeo rohita)

416

25

0.23

7.4

10–720

70.2

0.02***

0.2***

Mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala)

153

19

0.38

9.7

30–350

79.1

0.04***

0.38*

Pacu (Piaractus brachypomum)

31

4

0.78

5.05

20–100

90.3

0.11***

0.87

Red-eyed carp (Squaliobarbus curriculus)

39

8

0.24

2.19

80–210

76.9

0.03***

0.32

Silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)

382

23

4.75

216

20–430

86.9

0.46*

0.59

Crucian carp (Carrasius auratus)

66

18

1.09

9.2

18–170

77.3

0.11***

0.27*

Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

25

7

0.59

13.8

19–210

32.0

0.06**

0.04***

Other

28

12

4.29

64

12–420

75.0

0.42

0.31

  1. Based on all fish collected in 25 fish ponds in two communes, Nhgia Lac and Nhgia Phu, in Nam Dinh province, northern Vietnam over the entire study period
  2. amean no of metacercariae per g fish; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001