Skip to main content

Table 2 Mosquito taxa recorded in the study area of the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve (Romania) during the sampling period in 2014 and the host preference determining the possibility to be a potential bridge vector of West Nile virus

From: Pilot longitudinal mosquito surveillance study in the Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve and the first reports of Anopheles algeriensis Theobald, 1903 and Aedes hungaricus Mihályi, 1955 for Romania

Taxa

Involved in West Nile virus transmission elsewhere

Ornithophilic (bird-biting)

Anthropophilic (human-biting)

Potential bridge vector (readily bites both birds and humans)

Source for classification

Coquilettidia richiardii (Ficalbi, 1889)

yes

yes

yes

yes

[44]

Anopheles hyrcanus (Pallas, 1771)

yes

no

yes

no

[14]

Culex pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 (s.l.) /Cx. torrentium (Martini, 1925)a

(yes)c

(yes)c

(yes)c

yes

[44]

Aedes caspius (Pallas, 1771)

yes

no

yes

no

[44]

Culex modestus Ficalbi, 1890

yes

yes

yes

yes

[44]

Anopheles maculipennis Meigen, 1818 (s.l.)b

yes

no

yes

no

[44]

Aedes vexans (Meigen, 1830)

yes

no

yes

no

[44]

Unidentified

-

-

-

unclassified

-

Anopheles algeriensis Theobald, 1903

no

no

yes

no

[44]

Aedes sp.

-

-

-

unclassified

-

Aedes detritus (Haliday, 1833)

no

yes

yes

yes

[44]

Culex sp.

-

-

-

unclassified

-

Aedes flavescens (Müller, 1764)

no

no

yes

no

[44]

Aedes hungaricus Mihályi, 1955

no

no

yes

no

[14]

Aedes cinereus Meigen, 1818

yes

yes

yes

yes

[44]

Culiseta annulata (Schrank, 1776)

no

yes

yes

yes

[44]

Uranotaenia unguiculata Edwards, 1913

yes

no

no

no

[14, 45]

  1. aSelected specimens were identified as Culex pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 (s.l.) and Culex pipiens pipiens Linnaeus, 1758 by DNA-barcoding (Fig. 5), bselected specimens were identified as Anopheles messeae Falleroni, 1926 by DNA-barcoding (Fig. 5), c Culex pipiens (s.l.) and Cx. torrentium were not differentiated for most of the collected specimens