Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Geographical distribution of seroprevalence to CVBD agents among all the dogs included in the study

From: Countrywide serological evaluation of canine prevalence for Anaplasma spp., Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), Dirofilaria immitis and Ehrlichia canis in Mexico

Region Dogs Dogs infected (%) [95 % CI] Positivity (%) [95 % CI] Dogs co-infected (%) [95 % CI]
A Bb Di Ec
Northwestern 384 213 (55.47)** 63 (16.4)** 1 (0.26) 25 (6.51) 196 (51.04)** 64 (16.67)**
[50.3–60.2] [12.8–20.1] [0.0–0.8] [4.2–9.4] [46.1–56.0] [12.5–20.3]
Northeastern 349 114 (32.66) 23 (6.59)* 1 (0.29) 31 (8.88)* 80 (22.9)** 19 (5.44)*
[27.8–37.5] [4.3–9.2] [0.0–0.8] [6.0–12.0] [18.6–27.5] [3.4–8.0]
Northcentral 164 4 (2.44)** 1 (0.61)** 0 (0) 0 (0)* 4 (2.43)** 1 (0.61)**
[0.6–4.9] [0.0–1.8] [0.0–0.0] [0.0–0.0] [0.6–4.9] [0.0–1.8]
Western 140 54 (38.57) 14 (10) 0 (0) 3 (2.14) 52 (37.14) 15 (10.71)
[30.5–46.4] [5.7–15.0] [0.0–0.0] [0.0–5.0] [28.6–45.0] [5.7–15.7]
Eastern 205 54 (26.34)* 18 (8.78) 1 (0.49) 10 (4.88) 37 (18.05)** 11 (5.37)
[20.5–32.2] [4.9–12.7] [0.0–1.5] [2.0–7.8] [13.0–23.4] [2.4–8.8]
Southcentral 86 17 (19.77)* 4 (4.65) 0 (0) 2 (2.32) 13 (15.12)* 2 (2.32)*
[11.6–29.1] [1.2–9.3] [0.0–0.0] [0.0–5.8] [8.1–23.3] [0.0–5.8]
Southwestern 149 67 (44.97)* 19 (12.75) 0 (0) 2 (1.34)* 63 (42.3)* 16 (10.74)
[36.9–53.0] [7.4–18.8] [0.0–0.0] [0.0–3.4] [34.2–50.3] [6.0–16.1]
Southeastern 229 103 (44.98)* 27 (11.79) 1 (0.44) 18 (7.86) 81 (35.37) 23 (10.04)
[38.4–51.5] [7.4–16.2] [0.0–1.3] [4.8–11.8] [29.3–41.5] [6.6–14.0]
Mexican states 1706 626 (36.7) 169 (9.91) 4 (0.23) 91 (5.33) 526 (30.83) 151 (8.85)
[34.3–39.0] [8.6–11.4] [0.1–0.5] [4.3–6.4] [28.7–33.1] [7.5–10.2]
  1. Abbreviations: A Anaplasma spp., Bb Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato), Di Dirofilaria immitis, Ec Ehrlichia canis
  2. * Statistically significant difference (P < 0.05); ** Statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001) to the corresponding national average value of prevalence