Skip to main content

Table 3 OV16-IgG4 seropositivity distribution in the surveyed communities. Total number of individuals checked in each community, the number of positive, negative and dubious samples in each community (n) and the percent (%) of positivity, negativity and dubious results in each community are shown

From: Evaluation of onchocerciasis seroprevalence in Bioko Island (Equatorial Guinea) after years of disease control programmes

  Community Type of setting Total NEG UND POS
n % n % n %
1 Santo Tomás de Aquino Urban 12 11 91.7 0 0 1 8.3
2 Baney Zona Media B1 Rural 33 27 81.8 1 3.0 5 15.2
3 Manzana Casa Bola Urban 26 26 92.9 0 0 0 0
4 Zona Alta A1 Baney Rural 35 31 86.1 1 2.9 3 8.6
5 Alcalde 1 Malabo Urban 27 24 85.7 0 0 3 11.1
6 Colas Sesgas Urban 31 31 100.0 0 0 0 0
7 Inasa Maule Rural 24 16 66.7 1 4.2 7 29.2
8 Getesa Urban 30 29 90.6 1 3.3 0 0
9 Moka Bioko Rural 21 19 90.5 2 9.5 0 0
10 Impecsa Urban 30 27 90.0 3 10.0 0 0
11 Bilelipa Rural 25 21 80.8 2 8.0 2 8.0
12 Baney Zona Baja Rural 34 32 94.1 2 5.9 0 0
13 Santa Maria 4B Malabo Urban 39 37 92.5 1 2.6 1 2.6
14 Barrios Adyacentes Riaba Rural 21 16 72.2 0 0 5 23.8
15 Sampaka 1 Malabo Urban 38 33 86.8 1 2.6 4 10.5
17 Zona “D” C/N° 1–25 Malabo Urban 17 17 94.4 0 0 0 0
18 Cachirulo Urban 21 18 85.7 0 0 3 14.3
19 Santa María 4A Urban 41 39 86.7 0 0 2 4.9
20 Ruiché Rural 26 19 73.1 0 0 7 26.9
  1. Abbreviations: ID identification number, NEG negative results, POS positive results, UND undetermined results