Skip to main content

Table 3 OV16-IgG4 seropositivity distribution in the surveyed communities. Total number of individuals checked in each community, the number of positive, negative and dubious samples in each community (n) and the percent (%) of positivity, negativity and dubious results in each community are shown

From: Evaluation of onchocerciasis seroprevalence in Bioko Island (Equatorial Guinea) after years of disease control programmes

 

Community

Type of setting

Total

NEG

UND

POS

n

%

n

%

n

%

1

Santo Tomás de Aquino

Urban

12

11

91.7

0

0

1

8.3

2

Baney Zona Media B1

Rural

33

27

81.8

1

3.0

5

15.2

3

Manzana Casa Bola

Urban

26

26

92.9

0

0

0

0

4

Zona Alta A1 Baney

Rural

35

31

86.1

1

2.9

3

8.6

5

Alcalde 1 Malabo

Urban

27

24

85.7

0

0

3

11.1

6

Colas Sesgas

Urban

31

31

100.0

0

0

0

0

7

Inasa Maule

Rural

24

16

66.7

1

4.2

7

29.2

8

Getesa

Urban

30

29

90.6

1

3.3

0

0

9

Moka Bioko

Rural

21

19

90.5

2

9.5

0

0

10

Impecsa

Urban

30

27

90.0

3

10.0

0

0

11

Bilelipa

Rural

25

21

80.8

2

8.0

2

8.0

12

Baney Zona Baja

Rural

34

32

94.1

2

5.9

0

0

13

Santa Maria 4B Malabo

Urban

39

37

92.5

1

2.6

1

2.6

14

Barrios Adyacentes Riaba

Rural

21

16

72.2

0

0

5

23.8

15

Sampaka 1 Malabo

Urban

38

33

86.8

1

2.6

4

10.5

17

Zona “D” C/N° 1–25 Malabo

Urban

17

17

94.4

0

0

0

0

18

Cachirulo

Urban

21

18

85.7

0

0

3

14.3

19

Santa María 4A

Urban

41

39

86.7

0

0

2

4.9

20

Ruiché

Rural

26

19

73.1

0

0

7

26.9

  1. Abbreviations: ID identification number, NEG negative results, POS positive results, UND undetermined results