Skip to main content

Table 5 Confidence limits (95%) for PPV and NPV values for simulations presented in Fig. 7. Prevalence threshold 30.0% three months after cessation of MDA. Data from 300 village simulations with 500 people per village

From: Assessing the interruption of the transmission of human helminths with mass drug administration alone: optimizing the design of cluster randomized trials

Raw data from 300 simulations

Bounce back

Transmission interruption

Totals

Test positive

15

254

269

Test negative

21

10

31

Totals

36

264

300

  

95% Confidence limits

 
 

Estimated value

Lower limit

Upper limit

Prevalence of interruption

0.880

0.836

0.913

Sensitivity

0.992

0.929

0.980

Specificity

0.583

0.409

0.740

Probability of simulation being either transmission interruption or bounce back

 Interruption

0.9

0.855

0.930

 Bounce back

0.1

0.072

0.145

For predicted elimination - probability of being true or false

 True positive (PPV)

0.944

0.908

0.967

 False positive

0.055

0.032

0.092

For predicted bounce back - probability of true or false

 True negative (NPV)

0.677

0.485

0.826

 False negative

0.322

0.173

0.514

Likelihood ratios

 Positive (C)

2.309

1.568

3.401

 Negative (C)

0.064

0.034

0.124

 Positive (W)

16.933

10.347

27.713

 Negative (W)

0.476

0.277

0.817

  1. Abbreviations: C conventional, W weighted by prevalence