Skip to main content

Table 7 Confidence limits (95%) for PPV and NPV values for simulations presented in Fig. 9. Prevalence threshold 30.0% two years after cessation of MDA. Data from 300 village simulations with 250 people per village

From: Assessing the interruption of the transmission of human helminths with mass drug administration alone: optimizing the design of cluster randomized trials

Raw data from 300 simulations

Bounce back

Transmission interruption

Totals

Test positive

6

232

238

Test negative

47

15

62

Totals

53

247

300

  

95% Confidence limits

 

Estimated value

Lower limit

Upper limit

Prevalence of interruption

0.823

0.774

0.864

Sensitivity

0.939

0.900

0.964

Specificity

0.887

0.763

0.953

Probability of simulation being either transmission interruption or bounce back

 Interruption

0.792

0.742

0.837

 Bounce back

0.207

0.163

0.258

For predicted elimination - probability of being true or false

 True positive (PPV)

0.974

0.943

0.990

 False positive

0.025

0.010

0.057

For predicted bounce back - probability of true or false

 True negative (NPV)

0.758

0.630

0.854

 False negative

0.242

0.146

0.5370

Likelihood ratios

 Positive (C)

8.300

3.903

17.640

 Negative (C)

0.068

0.042

0.112

 Positive (W)

38.667

17.544

85.220

 Negative (W)

0.319

0.203

0.501

  1. Abbreviations: C conventional, W weighted by prevalence