Skip to main content

Table 1 Protective efficacy of the 15 sub-libraries in the first round of cDNA expression library screening

From: Identification of immune protective genes of Eimeria maxima through cDNA expression library screening

Group

Average body-weight gain (g)

Relative body-weight gain (%)

Mean lesion scores

Decreased oocyst output (%)

ACI

Unchallenged control

86.59 ± 18.89f

100

0 ± 0a

100

200

Challenged control

23.50 ± 13.29a

25.14

3.10 ± 0.27f

0

54.14

pVAX1 control

26.26 ± 10.90ab

27.88

2.50 ± 0.31e

6.28

62.88

Pool 1

41.67 ± 15.75bcd

47.16

1.43 ± 0.40ab

49.54

127.79

Pool 2

69.50 ± 25.85ef

79.37

1.45 ± 0.45ab

60.27

154.79

Pool 3

80.57 ± 12.85f

90.80

1.22 ± 0.46a

70.57

168.57

Pool 4

58.81 ± 18.80de

66.06

2.40 ± 0.47de

57.16

137.06

Pool 5

56.90 ± 15.33cde

64.60

2.00 ± 0.57cde

53.00

139.6

Pool 6

59.38 ± 19.75de

65.99

1.94 ± 0.68cd

66.55

141.55

Pool 7

82.49 ± 25.46f

89.23

1.30 ± 0.59ab

68.67

171.16

Pool 8

77.67 ± 20.64f

85.52

1.22 ± 0.48a

74.59

168.27

Pool 9

49.66 ± 9.97cd

52.67

1.42 ± 0.53ab

62.03

133.39

Pool 10

57.73 ± 20.12de

65.38

2.40 ± 0.45de

54.27

136.38

Pool 11

40.60 ± 21.94abc

46.85

1.75 ± 0.51bc

46.37

124.35

Pool 12

58.89 ± 21.98de

64.64

2.10 ± 0.39cde

51.96

138.64

Pool 13

24.93 ± 11.20ab

26.88

2.48 ± 0.60e

15.53

97.07

Pool 14

58.70 ± 22.94de

63.45

2.12 ± 0.52cde

50.812

137.2

Pool 15

31.68 ± 9.17ab

36.41

1.42 ± 0.67ab

40.37

117.18

  1. Note: Significant difference (P < 0.05) between numbers with different letters; non-significant difference (P > 0.05) between numbers with the same letter