Skip to main content

Table 3 Protective efficacy of the 9 sub-libraries in the thrid round of cDNA expression library screening

From: Identification of immune protective genes of Eimeria maxima through cDNA expression library screening

Group

Average body-weight gain (g)

Relative body-weight gain (%)

Mean lesion scores

Decreased oocyst output (%)

ACI

Unchallenged control

98.26 ± 13.09e

100

0 ± 0a

100.00

200

Challenged control

37.72 ± 41.47a

40.91

3.05 ± 0.84f

0.00

70.41

pVAX1 control

41.47 ± 27.85ab

43.81

2.60 ± 1.16e

17.95

77.81

Pool 8–2–1

41.98 ± 26.55ab

45.34

2.00 ± 1.19d

75.64

120.34

Pool 8–2–2

79.85 ± 40.00d

84.74

1.02 ± 1.25b

61.54

164.54

Pool 8–2–3

54.62 ± 42.72bc

59.28

2.12 ± 1.17d

65.38

128.08

Pool 8–2–4

44.65 ± 30.68ab

46.35

2.30 ± 1.12de

71.79

113.35

Pool 8–2–5

43.87 ± 28.02ab

47.15

1.37 ± 1.07bc

43.59

113.45

Pool 8–2–6

51.47 ± 25.97bc

55.58

2.10 ± 1.29d

62.82

124.58

Pool 8–2–7

55.07 ± 26.63c

56.80

2.32 ± 1.09de

64.10

123.6

Pool 8–2–8

73.93 ± 30.41d

82.93

1.45 ± 1.35c

84.62

163.43

Pool 8–2–9

45.56 ± 38.25abc

50.20

2.55 ± 0.95e

62.82

114.7

  1. Note: Significant difference (P < 0.05) between numbers with different letters; non-significant difference (P > 0.05) between numbers with the same letter