Skip to main content

Table 2 Models of occupancy (ψ), the estimate of prevalence and rho (ρ), the estimate of detection probability for haemosporidian infections assessed using three molecular detection methods on samples from India and Sweden

From: Estimating prevalence of avian haemosporidians in natural populations: a comparative study on screening protocols

Model

QAIC

ΔQAIC

AICc Weights

Model Likelihood

Parameters

-2logL

Sweden + India

 {ψ (lab), ρ(methods*intensity)}

291.49

0.00

0.46

1.00

8

815.45

 {ψ(lab), ρ (methods *intensity) + lab}

293.22

1.73

0.19

0.42

9

814.64

 {ψ (lab), ρ (methods + intensity)}

293.58

2.09

0.16

0.35

6

833.47

 {ψ (lab), ρ (methods * intensity) + (methods*lab)}

295.23

3.74

0.07

0.15

11

808.75

 {ψ (lab), ρ(methods)}

296.00

4.51

0.04

0.10

5

846.57

 {ψ(lab), p(methods*lab) + intensity}

296.83

5.34

0.03

0.06

9

825.33

 {ψ(lab), p(methods + lab + intensity}

297.78

6.29

0.01

0.04

7

840.00

 {ψ(lab), ρ(methods*lab)}

299. 59

8.10

0.00

0.00

8

839.42

 {ψ (lab), ρ(methods + lab)}

301.96

10.47

0.00

0.00

6

858.28

 {ψ(lab), ρ(.)}

333.92

42.43

0.00

0.00

2

976.55

 {ψ(lab), ρ(intensity + lab)}

357.28

65.79

0.00

0.00

4

1033.87

 {ψ(lab), ρ(intensity*lab)}

427.48

135.99

0.00

0.00

3

1247.58