Skip to main content

Table 3 The efficacy of different attractants (for each trap type) relative to the CO2 for collecting anophelines and An. minimus

From: Field evaluation of two commercial mosquito traps baited with different attractants and colored lights for malaria vector surveillance in Thailand

  

Treatment

IRR

95% CI

χ 2

P-value

CDC LT

♀ Anopheline

CO2 (reference)

    
 

BG-lure + CO2

1.72

1.02–2.88

4.19

0.041

 

BG-lure

0.67

0.40–1.13

2.23

0.135

An. minimus

CO2 (reference)

    
 

BG-lure + CO2

1.99

1.16–3.41

6.19

0.013

 

BG-lure

0.63

0.36–1.09

2.74

0.098

BGS-Trap

♀ Anopheline

CO2 (reference)

    
 

BG-lure + CO2

1.02

0.66–1.60

0.01

0.917

 

BG-lure

0.19

0.11–0.33

34.55

< 0.0001

An. minimus

CO2 (reference)

    
 

BG-lure + CO2

1.55

1.01–2.39

4.00

0.046

 

BG-lure

0.18

0.09–0.34

27.65

< 0.0001

  1. Abbreviations: IRR estimated incident rate ratio, CI confidence interval, corresponding P-value based on maximum likelihood estimation of GLM with negative binomial error and log link function