Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalences of cluster mono- or mixed-infections and prevalences of cluster combinations in the 56 roe deer infected population

From: Detecting and characterizing mixed infections with genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) by developing an ankA cluster-specific nested PCR

Clustera

Mono-infections

Double infections

Triple infections

  

+ III

+ IV

+ III + IV

Cluster II

7/56 (12.5%)

18/56 (32.2%)

5/56 (8.9%)

5/56 (8.9%)

G: 1/7 (14.3%

G: 1/7 (14.3%)

G: 0/7 (0%)

G: 0/7 (0%)

A: 2/15 (13.3%)

A: 1/15 (6.7%)

A: 4/15 (26.7%)

A: 1/15 (6.7%)

V: 4/34 (11.8%)

V: 16/34 (47.1%)

V: 1/34 (2.9%)

V: 4/34 (11.8%)

Cluster III

7/56 (12.5%)

 

6/56 (10.7%)

 

G: 0/7 (0%)

 

G: 2/7 (28.6%)

 

A: 3/15 (20%)

 

A: 1/15 (6.7%)

 

V: 4/34 (11.8%)

 

V: 3/34 (8.8%)

 

Cluster IV

8/56 (14.3%)

   

G: 3/7 (42.8%)

   

A: 3/15 (20%)

   

V: 2/34 (5.%)

   

Total

Mono-infections

Double infections

Mixed infections (double and triple)

22/56 (39.3%)

29/56 (51.8%)

34/56 (60.7%)

G: 4/7 (57.1%)

G: 3/7 (42.9%)

G: 3/7 (42.9%)

A: 8/15 (53.3%)

A: 6/15 (40%)

A: 7/15 (46.7%)

V: 10/34 (29.4%)

V: 20/34 (58.8%)

V: 24/34 (70.6%)

  1. Abbreviations: G Gardouch, A Aurignac, V Villecartier
  2. aCluster numbers as in [6]. In each case, the first line in bold characters corresponds to the three locations together, and the three following, to each location separately