Skip to main content

Table 3 Prevalences of cluster mono- or mixed-infections and prevalences of cluster combinations in the 56 roe deer infected population

From: Detecting and characterizing mixed infections with genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) by developing an ankA cluster-specific nested PCR

Clustera Mono-infections Double infections Triple infections
   + III + IV + III + IV
Cluster II 7/56 (12.5%) 18/56 (32.2%) 5/56 (8.9%) 5/56 (8.9%)
G: 1/7 (14.3% G: 1/7 (14.3%) G: 0/7 (0%) G: 0/7 (0%)
A: 2/15 (13.3%) A: 1/15 (6.7%) A: 4/15 (26.7%) A: 1/15 (6.7%)
V: 4/34 (11.8%) V: 16/34 (47.1%) V: 1/34 (2.9%) V: 4/34 (11.8%)
Cluster III 7/56 (12.5%)   6/56 (10.7%)  
G: 0/7 (0%)   G: 2/7 (28.6%)  
A: 3/15 (20%)   A: 1/15 (6.7%)  
V: 4/34 (11.8%)   V: 3/34 (8.8%)  
Cluster IV 8/56 (14.3%)    
G: 3/7 (42.8%)    
A: 3/15 (20%)    
V: 2/34 (5.%)    
Total Mono-infections Double infections Mixed infections (double and triple)
22/56 (39.3%) 29/56 (51.8%) 34/56 (60.7%)
G: 4/7 (57.1%) G: 3/7 (42.9%) G: 3/7 (42.9%)
A: 8/15 (53.3%) A: 6/15 (40%) A: 7/15 (46.7%)
V: 10/34 (29.4%) V: 20/34 (58.8%) V: 24/34 (70.6%)
  1. Abbreviations: G Gardouch, A Aurignac, V Villecartier
  2. aCluster numbers as in [6]. In each case, the first line in bold characters corresponds to the three locations together, and the three following, to each location separately