Mosquito species
|
Effect size (logit)
|
95% CI (logit)
|
MIRb
|
95% CI (proportion)
|
% weight
|
---|
Anopheles sinensis
|
-1.32
|
-1.36– -1.28
|
0.21
|
0.20–0.22
|
2.44
|
Culex tritaeniorhynchus
|
-1.19
|
-1.70– -0.68
|
0.23
|
0.15–0.34
|
21.22
|
Mansonia uniformis
|
-1.85
|
-3.34– -0.36
|
0.14
|
0.03–0.41
|
4.02
|
Anopheles subpictus
|
0.93
|
-0.03–1.89
|
0.72
|
0.49–0.87
|
4.38
|
Culex gelidus
|
-1.01
|
-1.80– -0.22
|
0.27
|
0.14–0.44
|
15.36
|
Culex fuscocephala
|
-1.47
|
-2.53– -0.41
|
0.19
|
0.07–0.40
|
7.23
|
Culex vishnui
|
-0.37
|
-0.48– -0.26
|
0.41
|
0.38–0.44
|
4.80
|
Culex spp.
|
-0.34
|
-1.07–0.38
|
0.41
|
0.26–0.59
|
18.55
|
Culex pseudovishnui
|
-1.32
|
-1.65– -1.00
|
0.21
|
0.16–0.27
|
5.42
|
Culex sitiens subgroup
|
0.84
|
-2.67–4.34
|
0.70
|
0.07–0.99
|
7.26
|
Ochlerotatus vigilax
|
-0.85
|
-0.93– -0.77
|
0.30
|
0.28–0.32
|
2.43
|
Anopheles vagus
|
-0.53
|
-1.16–0.10
|
0.37
|
0.24–0.52
|
2.16
|
Aedes spp.
|
-1.21
|
-1.43– -0.99
|
0.23
|
0.19–0.27
|
2.40
|
Culex whitmorei
|
-1.21
|
-1.56– -0.86
|
0.23
|
0.17–0.30
|
2.34
|
Overall
|
-0.79
|
-1.06– -0.51
|
0.31
|
0.26–0.37
|
100
|
-
aRandom-effects meta-analysis using the method of DerSimonian & Laird [24] to estimate the variance between studies, using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) algorithm. I
2 range: 80.7% (P-value = 0.06) (Anopheles subpictus) – 100.00% (P-value = 0.64) (Culex sitiens subgroup)
-
b
p = (e
logit/ (e
logit+1))