Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalence of infected flies and seasonal transmission potential in sentinel and extra-sentinel communities, 2012

From: Elimination of onchocerciasis in Ecuador: findings of post-treatment surveillance

Community

Flies screened

Pools screened

Positive pools

Rate of infected fliesa (CI)b

Seasonal biting rate (CI)b

Seasonal transmission potential (CI)b

Corriente Grande

9876

236

0

0 (0–0.39)

56,867 (53,162–60,825)

0 (0–11.1)

El Tigre

7753

216

0

0 (0–0.49)

40,797 (38,821–42,872)

0 (0–10.0)

San Miguel

7450

200

0

0 (0–0.51)

27,833 (25,218–30,708)

0 (0–7.1)

Naranjal

15,035

328

0

0 (0–0.26)

133,890 (117,616–152,396)

0 (0–17.4)

Capulíc

3187

81

0

0 (0–1.20)

10,739 (9929–11,609)

0 (0–6.4)

Hualpíc

10,644

226

0

0 (0–0.40)

65,127 (60,981–69,550)

0 (0–11.7)

Medianíac

7213

154

0

0 (0–0.50)

24,615 (21,388–28,305)

0 (0–6.5)

La Ceibac

7153

151

0

0 (0–0.50)

38,348 (36369–40,432)

0 (0–10.2)

Total

68,311

1592

0

0 (0–0.10)

34,117 (32,796–35,490)

0 (0–1.0)

  1. aNumber infected flies per 2000 flies sampled
  2. bShown are point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI)
  3. cExtra-sentinel sites