From: Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
Variable | Descriptive statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Range | |
Landscape composition variables | |||
āProportion of artificial land (%) | 12.6 | 4.9 | 7.6ā20.5 |
āProportion of wetland (%) | 1.4 | 1.1 | 0.7ā4.2 |
āProportion of grassland (%) | 30.0 | 5.7 | 21.2ā39.5 |
āProportion of arable land (%) | 18.5 | 12.8 | 4.8ā43.1 |
āProportion of permanent crops (%) | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0ā1.6 |
āProportion of fallow land (%) | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2ā0.7 |
āProportion of hardwood forest (%) | 10.6 | 6.4 | 0.9ā19.5 |
āProportion of conifer forest (%) | 9.6 | 8.1 | 0.3ā22.9 |
āProportion of forest (unspecified type) (%) | 13.9 | 5.8 | 3.2ā21.9 |
āPublic forest (%) | 32.0 | 19.0 | 2.2ā67.8 |
Landscape configuration variables | |||
āArea-weighted mean shape index (-) | 2.2 | 0.2 | 2.0ā2.7 |
āArea-weighted mean patch fractal dimension (-) | 1.30 | 0.01 | 1.29ā1.31 |
āEdge density (m/ha) | 150.8 | 46.2 | 97.2ā216.0 |
āPatch density number (#/ha) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1ā0.4 |
Wildlife variables | |||
āBoar density per TMU (n/km2) | 4.4 | 1.4 | 2.4ā7.3 |
āRoe deer density per TMU (n/km2) | 7.3 | 1.4 | 6.1ā10.1 |
āRed deer density per TMU (n/km2) | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0ā3.5 |
āBoar shot per TMU (n/km2) | 3.7 | 1.8 | 1.2ā6.7 |
āRoe deer shot per TMU (n/km2) | 3.2 | 0.6 | 2.7ā4.3 |
āRed deer shot per TMU (n/km2) | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0ā1.4 |
Belgian forest inventory variables | |||
āNatura 2000 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 0.2ā0.5 |
āSlope | 6.3 | 1.5 | 3.9ā8.9 |
āST3 - < 5% | 17.9 | 2.3 | 13.9ā22.1 |
āST3 - 5ā24% | 24.0 | 4.3 | 15.6ā29.1 |
āST3 - 25ā49% | 15.2 | 3.0 | 10.6ā19.7 |
āST3 - 50ā75% | 7.1 | 1.2 | 5.6ā8.9 |
āST3 - > 75% | 3.1 | 1.0 | 1.4ā5.5 |
āST3ā9 - < 5% | 9.1 | 1.8 | 6.9ā12.4 |
āST3ā9 - 5ā24% | 16.2 | 3.7 | 10.2ā24.2 |
āST3ā9 - 25ā49% | 16.3 | 4.6 | 9.3ā21.4 |
āST3ā9 - 50ā75% | 11.4 | 4.3 | 5.0ā17.2 |
āST3ā9 - > 75% | 8.5 | 3.0 | 4.6ā12.5 |