Table 5 Bivariate logistic regressions between the seropositivity for Borrelia infection and environmental variables
From: Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
Standardized variables | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|
Proportion of arable lands (%) | 1.26 (0.97–1.65) | 0.09 |
Proportion of grassland (%) | 0.76 (0.58–1.01) | 0.05 |
Proportion of forest (unspecified type) (%) | 0.86 (0.63–1.08) | 0.16 |
Proportion of hardwood forest (%) | 1.29 (0.98–1.70) | 0.07 |
Proportion of conifer forest (%) | 0.74 (0.55–0.98) | 0.04 |
Public forest (%) | 0.82 (0.62–1.08) | 0.16 |
Roe deer density shot per direction (n/km2) | 0.77 (0.59–1.00) | 0.05 |
ST3 - 5–24% | 1.36 (1.01–1.83) | 0.04 |
ST3 - 25–49% | 1.45 (1.10–1.92) | 0.09 |
ST3–9 - < 5% | 0.70 (0.52–0.94) | 0.02 |
ST3–9 - 25–49% | 1.39 (1.05–1.86) | 0.02 |
ST3–9 - 50–75% | 1.40 (1.06–1.84) | 0.02 |
ST3–9 - > 75% | 1.34 (1.02–1.77) | 0.04 |