Skip to main content

Table 4 Co-infection prevalence (%) between studied pathogens in I. ricinus and I. persulcatus samples

From: Tick-borne pathogens in Finland: comparison of Ixodes ricinus and I. persulcatus in sympatric and parapatric areas

Species

Collection area

No. of ticks analysed

No. (%) of ticks co-infected

B. b. (s.l.) + Rickettsia spp.

B. b. (s.l.) + Anaplasma spp.

B. b. (s.l.) + Babesia spp.

B. b. (s.l.) + “Ca. N. mikurensis”

Babesia spp. + Rickettsia spp.

Anaplasma spp. + Rickettsia spp.

I. ricinus

1

994

33 (3.2)

17 (1.6)

2 (0.2)

3 (0.3)

6 (0.6)

1 (0.1)

4 (0.4)

2

998

16 (1.6)

13 (1.3)

1 (0.1)

0

0

2 (0.2)

0

3

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

a

17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Subtotal

 

2014

49 (2.4)

30 (1.5)

3 (0.2)

3 (0.2)

6 (0.3)

3 (0.2)

4 (0.2)

I. persulcatus

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

1160

9 (0.8)

9 (0.8)

0

0

0

0

0

3

261

2 (0.8)

2 (0.8)

0

0

0

0

0

a

30

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Subtotal

 

1451

11 (0.8)

11 (0.8)

0

0

0

0

0

Total

 

3465

60 (1.7)

41 (1.2)

3 (0.1)

3 (0.1)

6 (0.2)

3 (0.1)

4 (0.1)

  1. Abbreviations: B.b. (s.l.), Borrelia burgdorferi (s.l.); 1, I. ricinus-dominated area in south Finland; 2, sympatric area of both species in middle Finland; 3, I. persulcatus-dominated area in north Finland (Fig. 1a)
  2. aTick samples that were not categorized into collection areas due to inaccurate collection information provided by citizens