Skip to main content

Table 3 Predictions of the fitted models with the experimental parameters for different measures of suitability to sexual size dimorphism sorting methods. Performance (% males recovery) at different levels of purity (% males in the sorted sample)

From: Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species

Species/Strain

Batch

SDI

SHI

Performance

Purity = 99.9

Purity = 99.5

Purity = 99.0

An. arabiensis Dongola

1

0.58

1.01

<0.01

0.04

0.23

2

0.09

0.98

-

-

-

3

0.09

1.02

<0.01

<0.01

-

Total

0.24

1.00

<0.01

<0.01

-

Ae. albopictus Rimini

1

1.89

0.99

73.09

88.45

92.96

2

2.35

0.96

95.12

98.78

99.45

3

1.95

1.04

83.92

93.55

96.19

Total

1.91

1.02

78.97

91.13

94.62

Ae. polynesiensis Aito (BC9)

1

2.87

0.96

99.41

99.89

99.96

2

2.69

1.03

98.93

99.74

99.88

3

3.00

0.92

99.78

99.97

99.99

Total

2.29

0.97

91.41

97.25

98.55

Ae. aegypti GSS

1

2.00

1.02

80.28

91.51

94.74

2

2.65

1.00

98.65

99.68

99.86

3

2.54

0.87

95.17

99.03

99.61

Total

1.94

0.81

33.75

74.51

86.43

Ae. aegypti Sri Lanka

1

1.35

0.92

5.54

31.16

48.47

2

1.63

0.89

24.63

60.80

75.26

3

1.67

0.93

37.38

67.23

78.52

Total

1.51

0.90

15.66

48.85

64.99

Ae. aegypti WB2-BRA

1

2.35

0.92

95.69

99.15

99.67

2

2.46

0.82

89.46

97.94

99.21

3

2.40

0.89

89.61

97.23

98.69

Total

1.96

0.89

63.59

86.67

92.77

  1. Abbreviations: SDI, SHI, dimensionless parameters, characteristic of each batch