Skip to main content

Table 3 Predictions of the fitted models with the experimental parameters for different measures of suitability to sexual size dimorphism sorting methods. Performance (% males recovery) at different levels of purity (% males in the sorted sample)

From: Exploring the potential of computer vision analysis of pupae size dimorphism for adaptive sex sorting systems of various vector mosquito species

Species/Strain Batch SDI SHI Performance
Purity = 99.9 Purity = 99.5 Purity = 99.0
An. arabiensis Dongola 1 0.58 1.01 <0.01 0.04 0.23
2 0.09 0.98 - - -
3 0.09 1.02 <0.01 <0.01 -
Total 0.24 1.00 <0.01 <0.01 -
Ae. albopictus Rimini 1 1.89 0.99 73.09 88.45 92.96
2 2.35 0.96 95.12 98.78 99.45
3 1.95 1.04 83.92 93.55 96.19
Total 1.91 1.02 78.97 91.13 94.62
Ae. polynesiensis Aito (BC9) 1 2.87 0.96 99.41 99.89 99.96
2 2.69 1.03 98.93 99.74 99.88
3 3.00 0.92 99.78 99.97 99.99
Total 2.29 0.97 91.41 97.25 98.55
Ae. aegypti GSS 1 2.00 1.02 80.28 91.51 94.74
2 2.65 1.00 98.65 99.68 99.86
3 2.54 0.87 95.17 99.03 99.61
Total 1.94 0.81 33.75 74.51 86.43
Ae. aegypti Sri Lanka 1 1.35 0.92 5.54 31.16 48.47
2 1.63 0.89 24.63 60.80 75.26
3 1.67 0.93 37.38 67.23 78.52
Total 1.51 0.90 15.66 48.85 64.99
Ae. aegypti WB2-BRA 1 2.35 0.92 95.69 99.15 99.67
2 2.46 0.82 89.46 97.94 99.21
3 2.40 0.89 89.61 97.23 98.69
Total 1.96 0.89 63.59 86.67 92.77
  1. Abbreviations: SDI, SHI, dimensionless parameters, characteristic of each batch