From: Comparing trap designs and methods for assessing density of synanthropic flies in Odisha, India
 | n | Synanthropic flies (Median, IQR) | Difference (IRR) | 95% CI | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Control: non-baited pot trap | 428 | 7.0 (0.0–24.0) | Ref. |  |  |
Sucrose solution | 470 | 6.5 (1.0–27.0) | 1.10 | 0.45–2.69 | 0.838 |
Dry sucrose | 304 | 5.0 (0.5–14.5) | 0.71 | 0.29–1.74 | 0.455 |
Tomato | 276 | 5.0 (1.5–17.5) | 0.64 | 0.26–1.58 | 0.338 |
M. domestica | |||||
 Control: non-baited pot trap | 320 | 3.5 (0.0–18.5) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sucrose solution | 235 | 4.5 (0.5–12.5) | 0.73 | 0.29–1.88 | 0.519 |
 Dry sucrose | 214 | 3.0 (0.0–9.0) | 0.67 | 0.26–1.71 | 0.401 |
 Tomato | 115 | 2.0 (0.5–8.5) | 0.36 | 0.14–0.93 | 0.034 |
M. sorbens | |||||
 Control: non-baited pot trap | 108 | 0.5 (0.0–5.5) | Ref. |  |  |
 Sucrose solution | 235 | 2.0 (0.0–14.0) | 2.18 | 0.77–6.15 | 0.143 |
 Dry sucrose | 90 | 1.0 (0.0–5.5) | 0.83 | 0.29–2.39 | 0.734 |
 Tomato | 161 | 1.5 (0.5–4.5) | 1.49 | 0.53–4.23 | 0.453 |