Skip to main content

Table 3 Hot and cold spots of juvenile mortality in Paul do Mar

From: An evaluation of efficacy of the auto-dissemination technique as a tool for Aedes aegypti control in Madeira, Portugal

Cluster

ABS code

Area radius (km)

Obs.

Exp.

RR

P-value

Pre-treatment

1

14

0

10

0.91

17.7

7.9 × 10−8

T1

1

20–30, 32

0.120

21

58.62

0.24

3.1 × 10−10

2

37

0

20

2.82

8.11

5.4 × 10−10

3

2, 15, 16, 31, 33–35

0.026

65

28.95

3.32

5.4 × 10−10

4

1, 3–5, 10, 11

0.084

0

20.30

0

1.9 × 10−9

With BGST pre-treatment adult catches as covariate

1

1, 3–5, 10, 11

0.084

0

17.00

0

2 × 10−7

2

37

0

20

4.00

5.67

5.3 × 10−7

T2

1

3–5, 11, 12, 37

0.058

51

28.50

2.36

0.00063

2

21, 29, 32

0.025

2

15.37

0.12

0.00066

3

15, 34, 36

0.048

7

22.73

0.27

0.0028

With BGST post-treatment catches as covariate: no clusters

  1. Notes: Shown are observed (Obs.) and expected (Exp.) mortality rates (numbers of dead larvae/pupae) in significant hot or cold spots during pre-treatment, T1 and T2 periods, with and without BGST adult mosquito catches fitted as a covariate. ABS ID numbers, area covered by hot/cold spot, and relative risk (RR) with associated P-values are presented