Skip to main content

Table 7 Omission rates 10% and 0% for Rhodnius ecological niche models with and without palm distributions

From: Co-occurrence or dependence? Using spatial analyses to explore the interaction between palms and Rhodnius triatomines

Statistic

Palms included

R. neglectus

R. pictipes

R. prolixus

R. robustus

OR10%

No

0.124 ± 0.020

0.152 ± 0.222

0.123 ± 0.016

0.145 ± 0.039

Yes

0.152 ± 0.031

0.156 ± 0.019

0.108 ± 0.010

0.160 ± 0.027

Presence area 10%

No

0.224 ± 0.007

0.380 ± 0.016

0.208 ± 0.004

0.397 ± 0.014

Yes

0.230 ± 0.004

0.415 ± 0.013*

0.204 ± 0.002

0.426 ± 0.012

OR0%

No

0.010 ± 0.006

0.008 ± 0.005

0

0.030 ± 0.017

Yes

0.014 ± 0.010

0.008 ± 0.005

0.014 ± 0.003*

0.055 ± 0.012

Presence area 0%

No

0.712 ± 0.035

0.946 ± 0.005

0.969 ± 0.001

0.648 ± 0.015

Yes

0.395 ± 0.009*

0.869 ± 0.013*

0.648 ± 0.024*

0.690 ± 0.015

  1. *Significant difference between models with and without palms (paired t-test, significance level = 0.05)
  2. Notes: All values correspond to mean ± standard error (based on 10 repetitions)