Year (Y)
|
Study group
|
SAC treated
|
SAC total
|
Mean % SAC treateda
|
Total population treated
|
Total population eligible for treatment
|
% total population treated
|
---|
Y1
|
A1
|
16,563
|
20,267
|
82
| | | |
A2
|
18,986
|
18,809
|
101
| | | |
B1
|
20,382
|
24,670
|
83
| | | |
B2
|
25,281
|
30,373
|
83
| | | |
C1
|
22,479
|
17,598
|
128
|
43,600
|
58,648
|
74
|
C2
|
26,373
|
25,133
|
105
|
57,058
|
83,772
|
68
|
Y2
|
A1
|
15,053
|
13,425
|
112
| | | |
A2
|
13,553
|
14,309
|
95
| | | |
B1
|
19,322
|
17,378
|
111
| | | |
B2
|
16,345
|
17,227
|
95
| | | |
C1
|
23,512
|
18,123
|
130
|
47,031
|
60,410
|
78
|
C2
|
33,735
|
25,883
|
130
|
66,671
|
86,287
|
77
|
Y3 Treatment 1
|
A1
|
23,281
|
23,021
|
101
| | | |
A2
|
25,174
|
23,586
|
107
| | | |
B1
|
28,406
|
22,999
|
124
| | | |
B2
|
33,231
|
27,781
|
120
| | | |
C1
|
26,306
|
19,663
|
134
|
51,598
|
52,434
|
98
|
C2
|
39,311
|
24,415
|
161
|
74,558
|
65,106
|
115
|
Y3 Treatment 2
|
A1
|
0
|
23,021
| | | | |
A2
|
28,203
|
23,586
|
120
| | | |
B1
|
0
|
22,999
| | | | |
B2
|
25,274
|
27,781
|
91
| | | |
C1
|
0
|
19,663
| | |
52,434
| |
C2
|
33,003
|
24,415
|
135
|
61,182
|
65,106
|
94
|
Y4 Treatment 1
|
A1
|
20,708
|
25,368
|
82
| | | |
A2
|
18,178
|
21,528
|
85
| | | |
B1
|
27,316
|
29,813
|
92
| | | |
B2
|
29,202
|
33,822
|
86
| | | |
C1
|
22,664
|
19,042
|
120
|
42,464
|
50,761
|
84
|
C2
|
33,861
|
25,866
|
131
|
55,831
|
68,967
|
81
|
Y4 Treatment 2
|
A1
|
0
|
25,368
| | | | |
A2
|
16,309
|
21,528
|
76
| | | |
B1
|
0
|
29,813
| | | | |
B2
|
26,247
|
33,822
|
78
| | | |
C1
|
0
|
19,042
| | |
50,761
| |
C2
|
29,290
|
25,866
|
113
|
54,539
|
68,967
|
79
|
- aArithmetic mean weighted by village SAC population