From: Trematode diversity reflecting the community structure of Danish freshwater systems: molecular clues
Snail | Infection level | Lakesa | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rin | Bag | Utt | Søn-Z | Sjæ | Har | Fur | Far | Esr | Bur | Tis | Lyn | Bro | Stu | Ska | Mos | Tan | Tje | Hal | Søn-J | Alm | |||
Lymnaeidae | |||||||||||||||||||||||
 Lymnaea stagnalis | No. snails examined | 90 | 54 | 21 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 163 | 9 | 207 | 2 | – | – | 25 | 97 | 82 | 6 | 104 | 214 | 41 | 27 | 7 | 1173 |
No. snails infected | 42 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0 | 13 | 0 | – | – | 0 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 4 | 61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 213 | |
Prevalence (%) | 46.7 | 9.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.1 | 0 | 6.3 | 0 | – | – | 0 | 7.2 | 39.0 | 0 | 3.8 | 28.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.2 | |
 Radix balthica | No. snails examined | – | 303 | 44 | 75 | 22 | 101 | 18 | 15 | 111 | – | – | – | 110 | 13 | 21 | 3 | 49 | 73 | 140 | 93 | 9 | 1200 |
No. snails infected | – | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 42 | – | – | – | 45 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 173 | |
Prevalence | – | 9.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.99 | 77.8 | 0 | 37.8 | – | – | – | 41.0 | 0 | 19.0 | 0 | 14.3 | 26.0 | 0 | 9.7 | 22.2 | 14.4 | |
 Radix auricularia | No. examined | – | – | – | – | 9 | – | – | 25 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34 |
No. infected | – | – | – | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | – | – | – | 0 | – | – | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
 Stagnicola palustris | No. snails examined | – | 72 | – | 3 | – | 2 | 28 | – | 389 | 42 | 183 | 33 | – | – | 166 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 918 |
No. snails infected | – | 18 | – | 0 | – | 1 | 4 | – | 62 | 2 | 10 | 4 | – | – | 11 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 112 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | 25.0 | – | 0 | – | 0.5 | 14.3 | – | 15.9 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 12.1 | – | – | 6.6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 12.2 | |
 Omphiscola glabra | No. snails examined | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 16 |
No. snails infected | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | 2 | 8 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | 33.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 50 | – | – | – | – | – | 100 | 50 | |
Planorbidae | |||||||||||||||||||||||
 Planorbarius corneus | No. snails examined | – | 199 | 16 | 44 | – | 1 | 208 | – | 40 | 27 | – | 58 | – | – | 17 | 1 | 45 | – | – | 31 | – | 687 |
No. snails infected | – | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 57 | – | 0 | 0 | – | 3 | – | – | 3 | 0 | 4 | – | – | 0 | – | 68 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 27.4 | – | 0 | 0 | – | 5.2 | – | – | 17.6 | 0 | 8.9 | – | – | 0 | – | 9.9 | |
 Planorbis planorbis | No. snails examined | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14 | 113 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 127 |
No. snails infected | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | 5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 5 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | 4.4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3.9 | |
 Anisus vortex | No. snails examined | – | 46 | – | 59 | 169 | – | 422 | 157 | 262 | – | – | 158 | – | 6 | 111 | 1 | 11 | – | – | – | – | 1402 |
No. snails infected | – | 0 | – | 0 | 4 | – | 59 | 0 | 10 | – | – | 51 | – | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 130 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | 0 | – | 0 | 2.4 | – | 14.0 | 0 | 3.8 | – | – | 32.3 | – | 0 | 4.5 | 0 | 9.0 | – | – | – | – | 9.3 | |
Bithyniidae | |||||||||||||||||||||||
 Bithynia leachii | No. snails examined | – | – | – | – | – | 27 | 7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34 |
No. snails infected | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
 Bithynia tentaculata | No.snails examined | – | 21 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 21 | 3 | – | 1 | 20 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 66 |
No. snails infected | – | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0 | – | 1 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 6 | |
Prevalence (%) | – | 19.0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4.8 | 0 | – | 100 | 0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9.1 | |
Total prevalence (%) | 53.5 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 21.7 | 0.0 | 12.4 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 23.6 | 29.0 | 6.0 | 14.6 | 0.0 | 7.7 | 27.9 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 22.2 | 12.6 |