Skip to main content

Table 2 Algorithms and parameters considered in the ML/IA analysis

From: Machine learning approach to support taxonomic species discrimination based on helminth collections data

Algorithms

MM + GL + H

    

Correct instances (%)

Kappa

Specificity

Sensitivity

AUC

Accuracy

NPV

PPV

J48

93.172

0.92

0.962

0.966

0.979

0.964

0.965

0.964

Random Tree

89.257

0.89

0.934

0.951

0.944

0.942

0.949

0.936

REPTree

90.963

0.90

0.959

0.945

0.986

0.952

0.943

0.961

LMT

96.385

0.96

0.981

0.982

0.999

0.981

0.981

0.982

Majority Voting

94.679

0.94

0.974

0.970

0.972

0.964

0.969

0.975

Algorithms

MM + H

     

Correct instances (%)

Kappa

Specificity

Sensitivity

AUC

Accuracy

NPV

PPV

J48

88.253

0.88

0.932

0.941

0.955

0.937

0.939

0.934

Random Tree

86.646

0.86

0.949

0.935

0.93

0.942

0.933

0.950

REPTree

85.943

0.85

0.919

0.911

0.979

0.915

0.908

0.921

LMT

93.975

0.94

0.965

0.972

0.998

0.968

0.971

0.966

Majority Voting

91.867

0.91

0.955

0.959

0.957

0.957

0.958

0.956

Algorithms

MM + GL

     

Correct instances (%)

Kappa

Specificity

Sensitivity

AUC

Accuracy

NPV

PPV

J48

92.570

0.92

0.960

0.961

0.975

0.961

0.960

0.961

Random Tree

91.566

0.91

0.951

0.959

0.956

0.955

0.958

0.953

REPTree

89.056

0.88

0.942

0.941

0.98

0.941

0.939

0.944

LMT

96.686

0.96

0.984

0.982

0.999

0.983

0.981

0.985

Majority Voting

95.683

0.95

0.980

0.975

0.978

0.978

0.975

0.980

Algorithms

MM

     

Correct instances (%)

Kappa

Specificity

Sensitivity

AUC

Accuracy

NPV

PPV

J48

84.538

0.84

0.918

0.912

0.912

0.915

0.909

0.920

Random Tree

82.228

0.81

0.885

0.917

0.917

0.901

0.915

0.888

REPTree

84.337

0.83

0.915

0.912

0.912

0.914

0.909

0.918

LMT

91.867

0.91

0.956

0.958

0.958

0.957

0.957

0.957

Majority Voting

89.056

0.88

0.934

0.949

0.949

0.941

0.947

0.936

  1. Performance of algorithms is reported as specificity, sensitivity and accuracy following [24] and as corrected classified instances, kappa coefficient and AUC, as generated by Weka 3.8.3 software
  2. MM morphological and morphometric data, GL geographical location, H host, AUC area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value