Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline and serology data

From: Evaluation of factors influencing tick bites and tick-borne infections: a longitudinal study

Baseline

2018

2019

P-value

Total

Age, years, median (range)

45 (19–65)

46.5 (21–67)

0.76

46 (19–67)

Sex, male/female

112/102

81/49

0.071

193/151

Outdoor recreational activities, no. (%)

150/214 (70.1%)

96/130 (73.8%)

0.45

246 (71.3%, 95% CI 66.5–76.1)

Outdoor work-related activities, no. (%)

54/214 (25.2%)

31/130 (23.8%)

0.708

85 (24.7%, 95% CI 20.1–29.3)

Furred pet ownership, no. (%)

108/214 (50.47%)

57/130 (43.85%)

0.474

165 (47.9%, 95% CI 42.6–53.1)

Tick bite within season, no. (%)

15/214 (7.01%)

7/130 (5.38%)

0.55

22 (6.4%, 95% CI 3.8–9)

Borrelia burgdorferi

 IgM sample 1, no. (%)

14/214 (7.48%)

13/130 (10%)

0.293

27 (7.84%, 95% CI 4.9–10.6)

 IgG sample 1, no. (%)

10/214 (4.67%)

13/130 (10%)

0.069

23 (6.7%, 95% CI 4–9.3)

 Seroconversion, no. (%)a

6/93 (6.45%)

2/34 (5.88%)

1

8/127 (6.3%, 95% CI 2.1–10.5)

Rickettsia spp. (antigen: R. helvetica)

 IgM sample 1, no. (%)

0

0

 

0

 IgG sample 1, no. (%)

0

0

 

0

 Seroconversion, no. (%)

0

1/34 (2.9%)

 

1/127 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.02–4.3)b

 Anti-Rickettsia felis antibodies

0

0

 

0

  1. aSeroconversion was defined as detection of antibodies (IgM and/or IgG) in the follow-up sample not found in the primary sample, a change from IgM to IgG antibodies, or doubling of the AU in the second sample
  2. bClopper-Pearson was used for this analysis since Cochran's rule was not fulfilled
  3. AU arbitrary units of light