Skip to main content

Table 4 Post-hoc pairwise comparisons (likelihood test on odds ratios) of the proportion of A. gambiae female and male mosquitoes collected by the different methods

From: Eave and swarm collections prove effective for biased captures of male Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes in Uganda

Comparison

Odds ratio

P-value

Lower 95% CI

Upper 95% CI

BUSH vs ASP

16.24

< 0.0001

7.95

33.19

CPT vs ASP

10.77

< 0.0001

4.09

28.35

CPT vs Bush

0.66

0.4876

0.21

2.11

EAV vs ASP

11.66

< 0.0001

8.82

15.43

EAV vs Bush

0.72

0.3511

0.36

1.44

EAV vs CPT

1.08

0.8704

0.42

2.81

RBT vs ASP

12.55

< 0.0001

4.53

34.78

RBT vs BUSH

0.77

0.6746

0.23

2.57

RBT vs CPT

1.17

0.8266

0.30

4.57

RBT vs EAV

1.08

0.8863

0.39

2.94

SWN vs ASP

996.49

< 0.0001

466.43

2128.92

SWN vs BUSH

61.37

< 0.0001

22.77

165.37

SWN vs CPT

92.49

< 0.0001

28.30

302.24

SWN vs EAV

85.43

< 0.0001

40.71

179.28

SWN vs RBT

79.39

< 0.0001

23.26

270.96

  1. CI Confidence interval