Eave and swarm collections prove effective for biased captures of male Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes in Uganda

Parasites & Vectors

Table 8 Post-hoc pairwise comparisons (generalized linear model contrasts) of the yield per man hour of A. gambiae female and male mosquitoes collected using the different methods

Comparison	Value	Log-likelihood	Chi-square	P-value
Females
BUSH–ASP	3.55	170.57	120.43	< 0.0001*
CPT–ASP	4.24	160.08	99.46	< 0.0001*
CPT–BUSH	0.69	110.58	0.45	= 0.5009
EAV–ASP	0.55	114.90	9.08	= 0.0026
EAV–BUSH	− 2.10	141.44	62.17	< 0.0001*
EAV–CPT	− 3.69	137.35	53.99	< 0.0001*
RBT–ASP	4.46	160.92	101.13	< 0.0001*
RBT–BUSH	0.92	110.71	0.70	= 0.4015
RBT–CPT	0.22	137.35	0.03	= 0.8737
RBT–EAV	3.91	138.06	55.41	< 0.0001*
SWN–ASP	6.86	159.84	98.97	< 0.0001*
SWN–BUSH	3.31	111.68	2.66	= 0.1032
SWN–CPT	2.62	110.86	1.02	= 0.3128
SWN–EAV	6.31	138.93	57.16	< 0.0001*
SWN–RBT	2.39	110.73	0.76	= 0.3844
Males
BUSH–ASP	0.86	128.38	3.48	= 0.0620
CPT–ASP	1.58	129.99	6.73	= 0.0095
CPT–BUSH	0.72	127.17	0.30	= 0.2989
EAV–ASP	− 1.91	154.86	56.45	< 0.0001*
EAV–BUSH	− 2.77	178.57	103.87	< 0.0001*
EAV–CPT	− 3.49	173.20	93.13	< 0.0001*
RBT–ASP	1.29	129.22	5.18	= 0.0229
RBT–BUSH	0.43	126.86	4.43	= 0.5006
RBT–CPT	0.12	126.69	0.12	= 0.7311
RBT–EAV	3.20	170.99	88.72	< 0.0001*
SWN–ASP	− 0.11	126.67	0.07	= 0.7933
SWN–BUSH	− 0.96	128.85	4.43	= 0.0353
SWN–CPT	− 1.69	130.54	7.80	= 0.0052
SWN–EAV	1.80	150.73	48.20	< 0.0001*
SWN–RBT	− 1.40	129.72	6.16	= 0.0131

ISSN: 1756-3305